Table 2 Erosion reducing effect of different treatment groups under freeze-thaw conditions.
Treatments | Wind speed (m/s)) | Number of freeze-thaw cycles (times) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 10 | 20 | 30 | ||
B | 6 | 32.52% | 21.45% | 18.35% | 8.71% |
9 | 67.67% | 31.77% | 21.44% | 21.60% | |
12 | 15.99% | 9.69% | 31.60% | 31.97% | |
15 | 35.13% | 36.72% | 43.21% | 48.33% | |
C | 6 | 39.61% | 46.05% | 21.23% | 12.53% |
9 | 67.74% | 43.74% | 25.54% | 15.42% | |
12 | 33.82% | 40.78% | 26.46% | 29.50% | |
15 | 35.18% | 36.86% | 44.19% | 48.11% | |
CB | 6 | 88.62% | 74.28% | 40.79% | 20.38% |
9 | 82.53% | 58.57% | 36.11% | 25.95% | |
12 | 38.23% | 31.99% | 51.65% | 50.45% | |
15 | 56.98% | 57.92% | 59.16% | 64.73% | |
