Table 2 Comparison of the major features of the, da Vinci, Hugo and Carina robotic surgical platforms.

From: Initial experience with the novel modular robotic system Carina in urology: a prospective study on safety feasibility and surgical settings

Features

DaVinci

Hugo RAS

Carina

Manufacturer

Intuitive surgical

Medtronic

Ronovo Surgical

Mode of robotic movement

Master–slave

Master–slave

Master–slave

Surgeon console

Closed

Open

Closed

3D viewing

Immersive viewfinder

Passive 3D glasses

Immersive viewfinder

Surgeon control

Finger grip, foot pedals

Pistol-like handle, foot pedals

Finger grip, foot pedals

Patient cart

4 robotic arms mounted in a single patient cart

3–4 independent modular arms

3–4 independent modular arms

Optics

8 mm, 3D, HD

10 mm, 3D, HD

10 mm, 3D, HD

Compatible with third-party laparoscopic platforms

No

Yes

Yes

Compatible with third-party energy platforms

No

Yes

Yes

Instrument, diameter

Wristed, 8 mm

Wristed, 8 mm

Wristed, 8 mm; Straight-stick, 5 mm

Instruments’ reusability

Reusables, 10 times

Reusables, 15 times

Disposables (8 mm); Reusables (5 mm), 20 times

Ergonomic settings

Yes

Yes

Yes

Scale motion

Yes

Yes

Yes

Force feedback

Yes

No

No

Safety feature

Console with head tracking system

3D glasses with head tracking system

Console with head tracking system

Location of emergency stop button

Console

Console and Cart

Console and Cart

Docking memory

Yes, procedure specific

Not available

Yesa

Role of bed-side assistant

Supporting, passive

Supporting, passive

Supporting, passive

Camera

0° and 30°, 10 mm, no ICG

0° and 30°, 8 mm, ICG

0° and 30°, 10 mm, ICGa

  1. 3D Three Dimension, HD High-Definition, ICG Indocyanine Green.
  2. aUnder development.