Table 2 Results of linear models examining the effect of personality traits on responses to stimuli.

From: Exploring the induction and measurement of positive affective state in equines through a personality-centred lens

Principal component

Independent variable

Personality trait

Overall model result

Effect variable

Effect result

Suggested affective influence

PC1

Stimulus

Unfriendly

F = 5.8926, df = 3, p < 0.001

Scratch

t = 0.610, df = 199.44, p < 0.001

Increased arousal to scratch

PC1

Stimulus

Affiliative

F = 0.5222, df = 3, p = 0.667

Scratch

t = 2.056, df = 199.68, p < 0.05

Increased arousal to scratch

PC1

Stimulus

Bold

F = 0.6095, df = 3, p = 0.6096

Food

t = 1.993, df = 199.80, p < 0.05

Increased arousal to food

PC1

Stimulus

Unresponsive

F = 2.7937, df = 3, p < 0.05

Training

t = 2.889, df = 200.27, p < 0.05

Increased arousal to training

PC1

Stimulus

Nervous

F = 8.7709, df = 3, p < 0.001

Food

t = 2.765, df = 199.991, p < 0.01

Increased arousal to food

PC1

Stimulus

Nervous

F = 8.7709, df = 3, p < 0.001

Scratch

t = 4.365, df = 200.533, p < 0.001

Increased arousal to scratch

PC2

Stimulus

Exuberant

F = 0.5272, df = 3, p = 0.664

Companion

t = -2.630, df 74.142, p = 0.01

Decreased positive valence to companion

PC2

Stimulus

Bold

F = 2.3902, df = 3, p = 0.06

Training

t = 2.633, df = 199.130, p < 0.01

Increased positive valence to training

PC2

Stimulus

Bold

F = 2.3902, df = 3, p = 0.06

Companion

t = -2.073, df = 84.244, p < 0.05

Decreased positive valence to companion

PC2

Stimulus

Unresponsive

F = 2.3713, df = 3, p = 0.07

Training

t = 2.542, df = 201.695, p = 0.01

Increased positive valence to training

PC2

Stimulus

Nervous

F = 1.7283, df = 3, p = 0.16

Companion

t = -1.999, df = 85.500, p < 0.05

Decreased positive valence to companion

PC2

Stimulus

Nervous

F = 1.7283, df = 3, p = 0.16

Training

t = 2.180, df = 200.734, p < 0.05

Increased positive valence to training

PC2

Trial

Unfriendly

F = 2.4939, df = 2, p = 0.08

After

t = 2.184, df = 204.779, p < 0.05

Increased positive valence after induction stimuli

  1. Results where the overall model was significant are highlighted in bold.