Table 1 Numerical results of the phylogenetic analyses. BS, best score (tree length); CI, Consistency Index; EW, parsimony analysis using equal weighting; IW, parsimony analysis using implied weighting; MPT, number of most parsimonious trees; NT, ‘New Technology’ search; RI, Retention Index; TS, ‘Traditional’ search.
Run | MPT (NT) | BS | MPT (TS) | CI | RI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EW | 24 | 7028 | 200,000 | 0.162 | 0.627 |
IW (K = 12) | 19 | 282.82054 | 200,000 | 0.162 | 0.626 |
IW (K = 15) | 5 | 245.66792 | 200,000 | 0.162 | 0.626 |
IW (K = 21) | 6 | 195.13297 | 200,000 | 0.162 | 0.626 |