Table 15 Performance comparison of existing works with proposed work.

From: Optimizing non small cell lung cancer detection with convolutional neural networks and differential augmentation

Author(s)

Proposed model

Accuracy

Islam et al. (2024)16

Generative adversarial networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs)

94%

Saha et al. (2024)17

VER-Net

91%

Rainio and Klén (2024)18

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)

92.6%

Kukreja and Sabharwal (2024)19

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)

96.11%

Zhang et al. (2024)20

DenseNet-CNN Integration

96%

Gai et al. (2023)21

Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Vision Transformers (ViTs)

93.4%

Quasar et al. (2023)22

Ensemble Model (BEiT, DenseNet, Sequential CNN with ensemble methods)

96.34%

Raza et al. (2023)23

Lung-EffNet (EfficientNet with modified top layers)

96.10%

Gautam et al. (2023)24

Ensemble (ResNet-152, DenseNet-169, EfficientNet-B7 with weight optimization)

97.23%

Dritsas and Trigka (2022)25

Rotation Forest

97.1%

Tsou et al. (2021)26

eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost)

92%

Our Work

CNN with DA

98.78%