Table 12 Overall results for comparative analysis.
Structures | Score values | Ranking results | Optimal result |
|---|---|---|---|
CFS40 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
CIFS41 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
CPyFS42 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
FRS31 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
IFRS32 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
Multi-granulation PyFRS33 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
The WASPAS Method based on IFS43 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
The WASPAS techniques for PyF data44 | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
Complex intuitionistic fuzzy rough45 approach | Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution |
Cannot discuss CPyFR data | No result | No solution | |
The WASPAS method based on the proposed theory | \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{1}\right)=0.47488,\:\) \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{2}\right)=0.43453\) \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{3}\right)=0.44099,\) \(\:\:S\left({\text{B}}_{4}\right)=0.46946\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}>{A}_{L4}>{A}_{L3}>{A}_{L2}\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}\) |
CPyFRYWA AOs (proposed) | \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{1}\right)=0.5662,\) \(\:\:S\left({\text{B}}_{2}\right)=0.5082\) \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{3}\right)=0.5165,\:\) \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{4}\right)=0.5537\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}>{A}_{L4}>{A}_{L3}>{A}_{L2}\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}\) |
CPyFRYWG AOs (proposed) | \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{1}\right)=0.5308,\) \(\:\:S\left({\text{B}}_{2}\right)=0.4930\) \(\:S\left({\text{B}}_{3}\right)=0.50027,\) \(\:\:S\left({\text{B}}_{4}\right)=0.5269\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}>{A}_{L4}>{A}_{L3}>{A}_{L2}\) | \(\:{A}_{L1}\) |