Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration: a 12-month pro re nata regimen
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 January 2026

Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration: a 12-month pro re nata regimen

  • Wataru Kikushima1,
  • Yoichi Sakurada1,
  • Yoshiko Fukuda1,
  • Seigo Yoneyama1,
  • Yumi Kotoda1,
  • Daphne Viel Tsuru1 &
  • …
  • Kenji Kashiwagi1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 737 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Macular degeneration
  • Pharmaceutics

Abstract

We compared 12-month treatment outcomes of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (IVBr) with aflibercept (IVA) for treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patients were given three monthly IVBr or IVA injections and were followed up monthly for 12 months. Additional injections were given if exudation or hemorrhage recurred. The study included 339 eyes in 339 patients divided into the IVBr or IVA groups. In both groups, central retinal thickness (CRT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved at the 12-month visit. BCVA improvement was similar in both groups (P = 0.27). Age, baseline BCVA, and thickness of the central retina and subfoveal choroid were associated with the 12-month BCVA. The proportion of patients who did not require additional injections was 33% in the IVBr and 30% in the IVA group (P = 0.58). The number of additional injections showed a trend favoring IVBr over IVA but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.055). Age, risk alleles of ARMS2 A69S, and baseline CRT were associated with shorter retreatment-free period. In conclusion, IVBr achieved similar visual and anatomic treatment outcomes to IVA with a trend toward requiring fewer additional injections during 12-month follow-up of as-needed regimen for exudative AMD.

Data availability

Our data cannot be shared openly in order to protect the privacy of the participants. Data would be partially available from the corresponding author, Y.S., upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Kawasaki, R. et al. The prevalence of age-related macular degeneration in Asians: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 117, 921–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.10.007 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wong, W. L. et al. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 2, e106–116 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rosenfeld, P. J. et al. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 1419–1431. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa054481 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Heier, J. S. et al. Intravitreal aflibercept (VEGF trap-eye) in wet age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 119, 2537–2548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.006 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moisseiev, E., Tsai, Y. L. & Herzenstein, M. Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: An economic cost-risk analysis of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents. Ophthalmol. Retina 6, 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.08.009 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferro Desideri, L., Traverso, C. E. & Nicolo, M. Brolucizumab: A novel anti-VEGF humanized single-chain antibody fragment for treating w-AMD. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 21, 553–561. https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2021.1915278 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tadayoni, R. et al. Brolucizumab: A newly developed Anti-VEGF molecule for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmologica 244, 93–101. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513048 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen, Q. D. et al. Brolucizumab: Evolution through preclinical and clinical studies and the implications for the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 127, 963–976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.12.031 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dugel, P. U. et al. HAWK and HARRIER: Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 127, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.04.017 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dugel, P. U. et al. HAWK and HARRIER: Ninety-six-week outcomes from the phase 3 trials of brolucizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 128, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.06.028 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Monés, J. et al. Risk of inflammation, retinal vasculitis, and retinal occlusion-related events with brolucizumab: Post hoc review of HAWK and HARRIER. Ophthalmology 128, 1050–1059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.11.011 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khanani, A. M. et al. Safety outcomes of brolucizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Results from the IRIS registry and Komodo healthcare map. JAMA Ophthalmol. 140, 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.4585 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shigemoto, Y. et al. The combination therapy of subtenon triamcinolone acetonide injection and intravitreal brolucizumab for brolucizumab-related intraocular inflammation. Medicine 100, e27580. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000027580 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Enriquez, A. B. et al. Early experience with brolucizumab treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 139, 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2020.7085 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bilgic, A. et al. Real-world experience with brolucizumab in wet age-related macular degeneration: The REBA study. J. Clin. Med. 10, 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132758 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baumal, C. R. et al. Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab in age-related macular degeneration: A systematic review of real-world studies. Acta Ophthalmol. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.15242 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fukuda, Y. et al. Comparison of outcomes between 3 monthly brolucizumab and aflibercept injections for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Biomedicines 9, 1164 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kikushima, W. et al. A treat-and-extend regimen of intravitreal brolucizumab for exudative age-related macular degeneration refractory to aflibercept: A 12-month result. Pharmaceuticals 16, 562. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16040562 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fukuda, Y. et al. Comparison of one-year outcomes between as-needed brolucizumab and aflibercept for polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy. Jpn J. Ophthalmol. 67, 402–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-023-00999-4 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Finger, R. P. et al. Comparative efficacy of Brolucizumab in the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Adv. Ther. 39, 3425–3448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-022-02193-3 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scupola, A. et al. Brolucizumab for wet age-related macular degeneration: One-year real-world experience from a tertiary center. Ophthalmologica 246, 58–67. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529817 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. MacCumber, M. W. et al. One-year brolucizumab outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration from a large united States cohort in the IRIS® registry. Ophthalmology 130, 937–946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.04.012 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Khanani, A. M. et al. MERLIN: Phase 3a, multicenter, randomized, double-masked trial of brolucizumab in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration and persistent retinal fluid. Ophthalmology 129, 974–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.04.028 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kikushima, W. et al. Incidence and characteristics of neovascular age-related macular with over a 12-month remission after three monthly aflibercept administration: 60 months results of a pro re nata regimen. Retina 44, 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000003994 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Holz, F. G. et al. Patient selection, evaluation, and treatment. Retina 42, 1629–1637. https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000003556 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mukai, R., Matsumoto, H. & Akiyama, H. Risk factors for emerging intraocular inflammation after intravitreal Brolucizumab injection for age-related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 16, e0259879. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259879 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Inoda, S. et al. Incidence and risk factors of intraocular inflammation after Brolucizumab treatment in Japan: A multicenter age-related macular degeneration study. Retina 44, 714–722. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000004009 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ferris III, F. L. et al. Clinical classification of age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 120, 844–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.036 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yannuzzi, L. A., Sorenson, J., Spaide, R. F. & Lipson, B. Idiopathic polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (IPCV). Retina 10, 1–8 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Cheung, C. M. G. et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy: Consensus nomenclature and non-indocyanine green angiograph diagnostic criteria from the Asia-Pacific ocular imaging society PCV workgroup. Ophthalmology 128, 443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.006 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Yamanashi, Shimokato 1110, Chuo, Yamanashi, 409-3898, Japan

    Wataru Kikushima, Yoichi Sakurada, Yoshiko Fukuda, Seigo Yoneyama, Yumi Kotoda, Daphne Viel Tsuru & Kenji Kashiwagi

Authors
  1. Wataru Kikushima
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yoichi Sakurada
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshiko Fukuda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seigo Yoneyama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yumi Kotoda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Daphne Viel Tsuru
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Kenji Kashiwagi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

W.K. and Y.S. wrote the main manuscript text and W.K. prepared all figures and tables. Y.S., Y.K., and Y.F. collected the data.W.K. and S.Y. conducted the genotyping of the peripheral blood collected from the participants. K.K. supervised all the process of the research. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoichi Sakurada.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kikushima, W., Sakurada, Y., Fukuda, Y. et al. Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration: a 12-month pro re nata regimen. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-34984-x

Download citation

  • Received: 03 March 2025

  • Accepted: 01 January 2026

  • Published: 05 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-34984-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Age-related macular degeneration
  • Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy
  • Brolucizumab
  • Aflibercept
  • Recurrence
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research