Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment technique with incremental PEEP in dogs: a clinical study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 07 January 2026

Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment technique with incremental PEEP in dogs: a clinical study

  • Chiara Di Franco1,2,
  • Søren Boysen3,
  • Benedetta Buonamici1,
  • Flavia Evangelista1,4 &
  • …
  • Angela Briganti1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 743 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Preclinical research
  • Respiratory signs and symptoms

Abstract

Pulmonary atelectasis is common following general anesthesia in dogs, often due to reduced functional residual capacity, oxygen absorption, and surfactant dysfunction. This study evaluated an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) using incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in anesthetized client-owned dogs with ultrasound-confirmed atelectasis. Dogs were assigned to two groups: mechanically ventilated (MV) or spontaneously breathing (SB). Following anesthesia, lung ultrasound atelectasis scores (LUAS) were recorded post-procedure and during recruitment, which began at PEEP 5 cm H₂O, incrementally increasing by 3 cm H₂O every two minutes until atelectasis resolved. Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were recorded.

Each group included 15 dogs. SB dogs were younger and had shorter anesthesia duration than MV dogs. Heart rate increased significantly at PEEP11 (SB) and PEEP14 (MV). Et’CO₂ rose in the SB group during early recruitment. Peak inspiratory pressure and compliance were significantly lower post-recruitment (p < 0.0001). Regional LUAS was significantly higher post-procedure than during recruitment, indicating effective atelectasis resolution. Total LUAS was higher in MV dogs than SB dogs. This study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided LUAS is a reliable, non-invasive tool for detecting and monitoring pulmonary atelectasis in dogs, and effectively guides individualized ARM protocols to improve perioperative respiratory care.

Data availability

Data is available on reasonable request to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

ARM:

Alveolar recruitment maneuvers

PEEP:

Positive end-expiratory pressure

LUAS:

Lung ultrasound atelectasis scores

MV:

Mechanically ventilated

SB:

Spontaneously breathing

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

CO:

Cardiac output

PLUS:

Point-of-care pleural and lung ultrasound

Et’CO2 :

End tidal CO2

HR:

Heart rate

SAP, MAP:

Systolic and mean blood pressure

PRAM:

Arterial pulse pressure recording analytical method

CI:

Cardiac index

PIP:

Peak inspiratory pressure

References

  1. Hedenstierna, G. & Edmark, L. Mechanisms of atelectasis in the perioperative period. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Anaesthesiol. 24 (2), 157–169 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  2. De Monte, V., Grasso, S., De Marzo, C., Crovace, A. & Staffieri, F. Effects of reduction of inspired oxygen fraction or application of positive end-expiratory pressure after an alveolar recruitment maneuver on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and lung aeration in dogs during anesthesia and neuromuscular Blockade. Am. J. Vet. Res. 74 (1), 25–33 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duggan, M. & Kavanagh, B. P. Pulmonary atelectasis: a pathogenic perioperative entity. Anesthesiology 102 (4), 838–854 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Staffieri, F. et al. Computed tomographic analysis of the effects of two inspired oxygen concentrations on pulmonary aeration in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res. 68 (9), 925–931 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Staffieri, F., De Monte, V., De Marzo, C., Scrascia, F. & Crovace, A. Alveolar recruiting maneuver in dogs under general anesthesia: effects on alveolar ventilation, gas exchange, and respiratory mechanics. Vet. Res. Commun. 34 (Suppl 1), S131–S134 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Song, I. K. et al. Effects of an alveolar recruitment manoeuvre guided by lung ultrasound on anaesthesia-induced atelectasis in infants: a randomised, controlled trial. Anaesthesia 72, 214–222 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mercado, P. et al. Moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome: hemodynamic and cardiac effects of an open lung strategy with recruitment maneuver analyzed using echocardiography. Crit. Care Med. 46 (10), 1608–1616 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nielsen, J. Central hemodynamics during lung recruitment maneuvers at hypovolemia, normovolemia and hypervolemia. A study by echocardiography and continuous pulmonary artery flow measurements in lung-injured pigs. Intensive Care Med. 32 (4), 585–594 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Michard, F. Changes in arterial pressure during mechanical ventilation. Anesthesiology 103 (2), 419–428 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ribonnet, C., Palmers, K., Saegerman, C., Vanderperren, K. & van Galen, G. Perioperative lung ultrasonography in healthy horses undergoing general anesthesia for elective surgery. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 36 (3), 1160–1172 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Monastesse, A., Girard, F., Massicotte, N., Chartrand-Lefebvre, C. & Girard, M. Lung ultrasonography for the assessment of perioperative atelectasis: A pilot feasibility study. Anesth. Analg. 124 (2), 494–504 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sun, L. et al. Lung ultrasound evaluation of incremental PEEP recruitment maneuver in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 55 (5), 1273–1281 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Park, S. K. et al. Ultrasound-guided versus conventional lung recruitment manoeuvres in laparoscopic gynaecological surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 38 (3), 275–284 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cylwik, J. & Buda, N. Lung Ultrasonography in the monitoring of intraoperative recruitment maneuvers. Diagnostics (Basel). 11 (2), 276 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Boysen, S., McMurray, J. & Gommeren, K. Abnormal curtain signs identified with a novel lung ultrasound protocol in six dogs with pneumothorax. Front. Veterinary Sci. 6, 291 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lundquist, H., Hedenstierna, G. & Ringertz, H. Barbiturate anaesthesia does not cause pulmonary densities in dogs: a study using computerized axial tomography. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 32, 162–165 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hedenstierna, G. Atelectasis formation during anesthesia: causes and measures to prevent it. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 16 (5–6), 329–335 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jang, Y. E. Effect of regular alveolar recruitment on intraoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients ventilated in the prone position: a randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Anaesth. 124 (5), 648– (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Smith, P. L. et al. The incidence of postoperative atelectasis in humans after prolonged anesthesia: A prospective study. J. Anesth. Analgesia. 128 (4), 789–795 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tusman, G., Acosta, C. M. & Costantini, M. Ultrasonography for the assessment of lung recruitment maneuvers. Crit. Ultrasound J. 8 (1), 8 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Généreux, V. et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure/recruitment manoeuvres compared with zero end-expiratory pressure on atelectasis during open gynaecological surgery as assessed by ultrasonography: a randomised controlled trial. Br. J. Anaesth. 124 (1), 101–109 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ambrosio, A. M. et al. Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure Titration and recruitment maneuver on lung inflammation and hyperinflation in experimental acid aspiration-induced lung injury. Anesthesiology 117, 1322–1334 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Canfrán, S. et al. Effects of fluid load on cardiovascular function during Stepwise lung recruitment manoeuvre in healthy dogs. Vet. J. 197 (3), 800–805 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was obtained for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Veterinary Sciences, Veterinary Teaching Hospital “Mario Modenato”, University of Pisa, 56122, Pisa, Italy

    Chiara Di Franco, Benedetta Buonamici, Flavia Evangelista & Angela Briganti

  2. Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council, via Giuseppe Moruzzi 1, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Chiara Di Franco

  3. Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada

    Søren Boysen

  4. Vet Hospital H24, Firenze, Italy

    Flavia Evangelista

Authors
  1. Chiara Di Franco
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Søren Boysen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Benedetta Buonamici
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flavia Evangelista
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Angela Briganti
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Chiara Di Franco, Søren Boysen, Benedetta Buonamici, Flavia Evangelista, Angela Briganti all made substantial contributions in the processes of study design, data acquisition, statistical analysis and results interpretation as well as in the drafting of the article and critical revision of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Søren Boysen.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This prospective clinical study was approved by the local Committee for animal welfare (n° 10/2023). All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations for studies involving animals and following ARRIVE guidelines. The study did not involve humans. Owner consent was obtained for inclusion of animals in this study.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Franco, C., Boysen, S., Buonamici, B. et al. Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment technique with incremental PEEP in dogs: a clinical study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35202-4

Download citation

  • Received: 15 May 2025

  • Accepted: 02 January 2026

  • Published: 07 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35202-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Lung ultrasound
  • Dog
  • Atelectasis
  • Lung recruitment maneuver
  • PEEP
  • POCUS
Supplementary Material 1
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing