Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Investigating property-porosity relationships for micro-architected lattice structures
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 16 January 2026

Investigating property-porosity relationships for micro-architected lattice structures

  • Brandon K. Zimmerman1,
  • Holly D. Carlton1,
  • Jonathan Lind1,
  • Justin Kerr1,
  • James S. Bellino1 &
  • …
  • Mukul Kumar1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 496 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Materials science
  • Physics

Abstract

Micro-architected structures are increasingly valued for their light weight and tunable mechanical properties; this class of material includes sheet structures like the Schöen gyroid and beam lattices like the octet. For design purposes, it is critical to understand how to tune the relative density (RD) to obtain desired mechanical properties. This study investigates the mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V gyroid structures, spanning a broad range of RDs (0.03–0.90), unit cell sizes (1–4 cm), and sheet thicknesses (0.2–7.8 mm). Results demonstrate that the classical Gibson-Ashby power law scaling between RD and modulus and yield stress does not adequately capture the response over a wide range of RDs, nor does it extrapolate correctly to the fully dense solid. Analytical models, in concert with experimental results and high-fidelity finite element calculations, show that the deviation from Gibson-Ashby reflects a transition from structure-dominated to material-dominated behavior. Distinctions are drawn between scaling relationships and property-porosity models, and an analytical model is proposed to better capture the evolution of mechanical properties with RD. These observations are mirrored in other architected topologies, like the octet, and highlight the importance of understanding the relationship between mechanical properties and geometry for design purposes.

Similar content being viewed by others

Selective hinge removal strategy for architecting hierarchical auxetic metamaterials

Article Open access 08 December 2022

Establishment of the microstructure of porous materials and its relationship with effective mechanical properties

Article Open access 23 October 2023

Tensile properties of sheet-based triply periodic minimal surface lattices fabricated using vat polymerization

Article Open access 20 December 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Ashby, M. Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection. Acta Mater.48, 359–369 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ashby, M. F. The properties of foams and lattices. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. A: Math., Phys. Eng. Sci.364, 15–30 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meza, L. R. et al. Reexamining the mechanical property space of three-dimensional lattice architectures. Acta Mater.140, 424–432 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Ketan, O., Rowshan, R. & Al-Rub, R. K. A. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3d printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Addit. Manuf.19, 167–183 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yan, C. et al. Evaluation of light-weight alsi10mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. J. Mater. Process. Technol.214, 856–864 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yan, C., Hao, L., Hussein, A. & Young, P. Ti-6al-4v triply periodic minimal surface structures for bone implants fabricated via selective laser melting. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.51, 61–73 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, L. et al. Mechanical response of a triply periodic minimal surface cellular structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Int. J. Mech. Sci.148, 149–157 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yang, E. et al. Effect of geometry on the mechanical properties of ti-6al-4v gyroid structures fabricated via slm: A numerical study. Mater. Des.184, 108165 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fu, J. et al. Improved light-weighting potential of ss316l triply periodic minimal surface shell lattices by micro laser powder bed fusion. Mater. Des.222, 111018 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Qiu, N., Wan, Y., Shen, Y. & Fang, J. Experimental and numerical studies on mechanical properties of tpms structures. Int. J. Mech. Sci.261, 108657 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ríos, I. et al. Compressive behavior of 316l stainless steel lattice structures for additive manufacturing: Experimental characterization and numerical modeling. Biomimetics10, 680 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samudin, I. M. et al. Stress strain curve analysis of sheet based tpms structures in quasi static compression test: A review. J. Mater. Res. Technol.36, 5757–5796 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Miao, X., Hu, J., Xu, Y., Su, J. & Jing, Y. Review on mechanical properties of metal lattice structures. Compos. Struct.342, 118267 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pabst, W., Gregorová, E. & Tichá, G. Elasticity of porous ceramics–a critical study of modulus- porosity relations. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc.26, 1085–1097 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Choren, J. A., Heinrich, S. M. & Silver-Thorn, M. B. Young’s modulus and volume porosity relationships for additive manufacturing applications. J. Mater. Sci.48, 5103–5112 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rice, R. Comparison of physical property-porosity behaviour with minimum solid area models. J. Mater. Sci.31, 1509–1528 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rice, R. Evaluation and extension of physical property-porosity models based on minimum solid area. J. Mater. Sci.31, 102–118 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pabst, W. & Gregorova, E. Minimum solid area models for the effective properties of porous materials-a refutation. Ceramics-Silikáty59, 244–249 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stefaniuk, D. & Kachanov, M. Voigt-reuss and hashin-shtrikman bounds revisited. Int. J. Eng. Sci.191, 103903 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhao, Y., Tandon, G. & Weng, G. Elastic moduli for a class of porous materials. Acta Mech.76, 105–131 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Messner, M. C., Barham, M. I., Kumar, M. & Barton, N. R. Wave propagation in equivalent continuums representing truss lattice materials. Int. J. Solids Struct.73, 55–66 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carlton, H. D. et al. Mapping local deformation behavior in single cell metal lattice structures. Acta Mater.129, 239–250 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlton, H. D., Volkoff-Shoemaker, N. A., Messner, M. C., Barton, N. R. & Kumar, M. Incorporating defects into model predictions of metal lattice-structured materials. Mater. Sci. Eng., A832, 142427 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zimmerman, B. K. et al. Solid face sheets enable lattice metamaterials to withstand high-amplitude impulsive loading without yielding. Int. J. Impact Eng195, 105130 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ataee, A., Li, Y., Brandt, M. & Wen, C. Ultrahigh-strength titanium gyroid scaffolds manufactured by selective laser melting (slm) for bone implant applications. Acta Mater.158, 354–368 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jones, A., Leary, M., Bateman, S. & Easton, M. Investigating mechanical properties of additively manufactured multimaterial gyroids: The effect of proportion, scale and shape. Addit. Manuf.76, 103784 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Maconachie, T. et al. The effect of topology on the quasi-static and dynamic behaviour of slm alsi10mg lattice structures. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.118, 4085–4104 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maskery, I. et al. Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer152, 62–71 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mazur, M. et al. Deformation and failure behaviour of ti-6al-4v lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting (slm). Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol.84, 1391–1411 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mishra, A. K., Chavan, H. & Kumar, A. Effect of cell size and wall thickness on the compression performance of triply periodic minimal surface based alsi10mg lattice structures. Thin-Walled Struct.193, 111214 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmad, A. Study on the benefits of lattice structures within the framework of high-performance structural design: a case study (2024).

  32. Al-Ketan, O. & Abu Al-Rub, R. K. Multifunctional mechanical metamaterials based on triply periodic minimal surface lattices. Adv. Eng. Mater.21, 1900524 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Schoen, A. H. Infinite periodic minimal surfaces without self-intersections, vol. 5541 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970).

  34. Vrancken, B., Thijs, L., Kruth, J.-P. & Van Humbeeck, J. Heat treatment of ti6al4v produced by selective laser melting: Microstructure and mechanical properties. J. Alloy. Compd.541, 177–185 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  35. DebRoy, T. et al. Additive manufacturing of metallic components-process, structure and properties. Prog. Mater Sci.92, 112–224 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mulay, R., Moore, J., Florando, J., Barton, N. & Kumar, M. Microstructure and mechanical properties of ti-6al-4v: Mill-annealed versus direct metal laser melted alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A666, 43–47 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Noble, C. R. et al. Ale3d: An arbitrary lagrangian-eulerian multi-physics code. Tech. Rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States) (2017).

  38. Steinberg, D. J. et al.Equation of state and strength properties of selected materials (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Livermore, 1996).

  39. Johnson, G. R. A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, Netherlands, 1983 (1983).

  40. Johnson, G. R. & Cook, W. H. Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng. Fract. Mech.21, 31–48 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Ashby, M. F. & Gibson, L. J. Cellular solids: Structure and properties. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge 175–231 (1997).

  42. Deshpande, V., Ashby, M. & Fleck, N. Foam topology: bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Mater.49, 1035–1040 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Boccaccini, A. R. & Fan, Z. A new approach for the young’s modulus-porosity correlation of ceramic materials. Ceram. Int.23, 239–245 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhong, H. et al. The gibson-ashby model for additively manufactured metal lattice materials: Its theoretical basis, limitations and new insights from remedies. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.27, 101081 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hashin, Z. & Shtrikman, S. A variational approach to the theory of the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials. J. Mech. Phys. Solids11, 127–140 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Al-Ketan, O. et al. Microarchitected stretching-dominated mechanical metamaterials with minimal surface topologies. Adv. Eng. Mater.20, 1800029 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNL-JRNL-2012804).

Funding

No funding to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA

    Brandon K. Zimmerman, Holly D. Carlton, Jonathan Lind, Justin Kerr, James S. Bellino & Mukul Kumar

Authors
  1. Brandon K. Zimmerman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holly D. Carlton
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jonathan Lind
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Justin Kerr
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. James S. Bellino
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mukul Kumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

BKZ: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Formal Analysis. HDC: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Investigation. JL: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Review & Editing, Formal Analysis, Investigation. JK: Investigation, Data Curation, Visualization, Writing—Review & Editing. JSB: Investigation, Data Curation. MK: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—Review & Editing, Funding Acquisition, Supervision, Project Administration.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon K. Zimmerman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zimmerman, B.K., Carlton, H.D., Lind, J. et al. Investigating property-porosity relationships for micro-architected lattice structures. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35262-6

Download citation

  • Received: 23 October 2025

  • Accepted: 05 January 2026

  • Published: 16 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35262-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing