Table 7 Performance comparison of different dynamic scheduling strategies in disturbance Scenarios.
Disturbance scenario | Scheduling strategy | Completion time (min) | Machine load (min) | Processing cost(kW·h) | Deviation degree of the plan | Calculation time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Urgent insertion | Method of this article | 129.0 | 534.0 | 281.9 | Medium | 3.2 |
|  | Benchmark method A (pure right shift) | 135.5 | 545.3 | 285.7 | Low | < 0.1 |
| Â | Benchmark Method B (Standard NSGA-II) | 131.8 | 540.1 | 283.5 | Medium | 2.8 |
machine stoppage | Method of this article | 130.0 | 514.0 | 297.0 | High | 3.5 |
|  | Benchmark method A (pure right shift) | 158.2 | 610.5 | 320.4 | Low | < 0.1 |
| Â | Benchmark Method B (Standard NSGA-II) | 133.5 | 521.7 | 301.2 | High | 3.1 |
