Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Mechano-stress endorsing heterogeneous lung cancer cells migration into confined channels and investigating tumor spheroids growth of confined space migrating cells
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

Mechano-stress endorsing heterogeneous lung cancer cells migration into confined channels and investigating tumor spheroids growth of confined space migrating cells

  • Md Kowsar Alam1,2,3,5,
  • Yuefeng Ma4,
  • Jiao Zhai1,2,3,
  • Heng Zou1,2,3,
  • Yu Chen1,2,3,
  • Ying Ni1,2,3 &
  • …
  • Mengsu Yang1,2,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Cell biology
  • Oncology

Abstract

Cancer cells in the tumor microenvironment and in the metastatic cascade leverage their different intrinsic and extrinsic properties to overcome the confined barriers of the metastatic cascade during metastasis. Although various studies have focused on cell migration under confinement, how the heterogeneity in the stiffness levels of single lung cancer cells affects their migration into confined spaces and the growth of tumor spheroids of confined space migrating cells remains unknown. This study explores how cancer cells with varying stiffness levels steer confined spaces and form post-migration tumor spheroids. Using a single-cell migration platform and a confined trans-well migration setup, the research uncovers that lung cancer cells with lower stiffness and reduced VIM expression exhibit selective migration into confined spaces. These cells, forming irregularly shaped spheroids post-migration, display nuclear shape deformation and downregulated VIM and LMNA genes linked to cell and nuclear stiffness. The findings highlight the heterogeneity of cancer cell migration in confined environments and the subsequent growth of tumor spheroids.

Data availability

Yes, I have research data to declare.The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Marusyk, A., Almendro, V. & Polyak, K. Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer? Nat. Rev. Cancer. 12, 323–334 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mroz, E. A. et al. High intratumor genetic heterogeneity is related to worse outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 119, 3034–3042 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chitty, J. L. et al. Recent advances in Understanding the complexities of metastasis. F1000Res, 7, 1169 (2018).

  4. Stewart, M. P. et al. Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding. Nature 469, 226–230 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quail, D. F. & Joyce, J. A. Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 19, 1423–1437 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pistollato, F. et al. Intratumoral hypoxic gradient drives stem cells distribution and MGMT expression in glioblastoma. Stem Cells. 28, 851–862 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Charras, G. T., Mitchison, T. J. & Mahadevan, L. Animal cell hydraulics. J. Cell. Sci. 122, 3233–3241 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Müller, D. J. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Atomic force microscopy: a nanoscopic window on the cell surface. Trends Cell. Biol. 21, 461–469 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Müller, D. J., Helenius, J., Alsteens, D. & Dufrêne, Y. F. Force probing surfaces of living cells to molecular resolution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 383–390 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vogel, V. & Sheetz, M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 7, 265–275 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGranahan, N. et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint Blockade. Science 351, 1463–1469 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Black, J. C. et al. Hypoxia drives transient site-specific copy gain and drug-resistant gene expression. Genes Dev. 29, 1018–1031 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ochalek, T., Nordt, F. J., Tullberg, K. & Burger, M. M. Correlation between cell deformability and metastatic potential in B16-F1 melanoma cell variants. Cancer Res. 48, 5124–5128 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lautscham, L. A. et al. Migration in confined 3D environments is determined by a combination of Adhesiveness, nuclear Volume, Contractility, and cell stiffness. Biophys. J. 109, 900–913 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Han, Y. L. et al. Cell swelling, softening and invasion in a three-dimensional breast cancer model. Nat. Phys. 16, 101–108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Islam, M. et al. Microfluidic cell sorting by stiffness to examine heterogenic responses of cancer cells to chemotherapy. Cell. Death Dis. 9, 239 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, C. Y., Lin, H. H., Tang, M. J. & Wang, Y. K. Vimentin contributes to epithelial-mesenchymal transition cancer cell mechanics by mediating cytoskeletal organization and focal adhesion maturation. Oncotarget 6, 15966–15983 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, A. V. et al. Stiffness of pancreatic cancer cells is associated with increased invasive potential. Integr. Biol. (Camb). 8, 1232–1245 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mendez, M. G., Restle, D. & Janmey, P. A. Vimentin enhances cell elastic behavior and protects against compressive stress. Biophys. J. 107, 314–323 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Patteson, A. E. et al. Loss of Vimentin Enhances Cell Motility through Small Confining Spaces, Small, 15 e1903180. (2019).

  21. Shabalina, E. Y. et al. The matrix-dependent 3D spheroid model of the migration of non-small cell lung cancer: a step towards a rapid automated screening. Front. Mol. Biosci. 8, 610407 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Taubenberger, A. V. et al. 3D microenvironment stiffness regulates tumor spheroid growth and mechanics via p21 and ROCK. Adv. Biosyst. 3, e1900128 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mahajan, V. et al. Mapping Tumor Spheroid Mechanics in Dependence of 3D Microenvironment Stiffness and Degradability by Brillouin Microscopy. 13, 5549 (Cancers, 2021).

  24. Liu, Y. J. et al. Confinement and low adhesion induce fast amoeboid migration of slow mesenchymal cells. Cell 160, 659–672 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips, M. J. et al. A novel approach to single cell RNA-Sequence analysis facilitates in Silico gene reporting of human pluripotent stem cell-Derived retinal cell types. Stem Cells. 36, 313–324 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, M., Li, C. W. & Yang, J. Cell Docking and on-chip monitoring of cellular reactions with a controlled concentration gradient on a microfluidic device. Anal. Chem. 74, 3991–4001 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nguyen, T. A., Yin, T. I., Reyes, D. & Urban, G. A. Microfluidic chip with integrated electrical cell-impedance sensing for monitoring single cancer cell migration in three-dimensional matrixes. Anal. Chem. 85, 11068–11076 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tong, Z. et al. Chemotaxis of cell populations through confined spaces at single-cell resolution. PLoS One. 7, e29211 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Winkler, B., Igor, S. & Ziebert, F. Confinement and substrate topography control cell migration in a 3D computational model. Commun. Phys., 2 82 (2019).

  30. Balzer, E. M. et al. Physical confinement alters tumor cell adhesion and migration phenotypes. Faseb j. 26, 4045–4056 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Petrolli, V. et al. Confinement-Induced transition between wavelike collective cell migration modes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 168101 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mohammed, D. et al. Substrate area confinement is a key determinant of cell velocity in collective migration. Nat. Phys., 15 858–866 (2019).

  33. Zhao, R. et al. Cell sensing and decision-making in confinement: the role of TRPM7 in a tug of war between hydraulic pressure and cross-sectional area. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw7243 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rianna, C., Radmacher, M. & Kumar, S. Direct evidence that tumor cells soften when navigating confined spaces. Mol. Biol. Cell. 31, 1726–1734 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li, C. W., Yang, J. & Yang, M. Dose-dependent cell-based assays in V-shaped microfluidic channels. Lab. Chip. 6, 921–929 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Massagué, J. TGFbeta Cancer Cell., 134 215–230. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Cascione, M., Leporatti, S., Dituri, F. & Giannelli, G. Transforming growth Factor-β promotes morphomechanical effects involved in epithelial to mesenchymal transition in living hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20 108 (2018).

  38. Chivukula, V. K., Krog, B. L., Nauseef, J. T., Henry, M. D. & Vigmostad, S. C. Alterations in cancer cell mechanical properties after fluid shear stress exposure: a micropipette aspiration study. Cell. Health Cytoskelet. 7, 25–35 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lekka, M. Discrimination between normal and cancerous cells using AFM. Bionanoscience 6, 65–80 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Fang, Y. et al. Investigating dynamic structural and mechanical changes of neuroblastoma cells associated with glutamate-mediated neurodegeneration. Sci. Rep. 4, 7074 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sneddon, I. N. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric Boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ståhlberg, A. & Bengtsson, M. Single-cell gene expression profiling using reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR. Methods 50, 282–288 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ståhlberg, A., Rusnakova, V., Forootan, A., Anderova, M. & Kubista, M. RT-qPCR work-flow for single-cell data analysis. Methods 59, 80–88 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Yuan, J. S., Reed, A., Chen, F. & Stewart, C. N. Jr. Statistical analysis of real-time PCR data. BMC Bioinform. 7, 85 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Azizipour, N., Avazpour, R., Sawan, M., Rosenzweig, D. H. & Ajji, A. Uniformity of spheroids-on-a-chip by surface treatment of PDMS microfluidic platforms. Sens. Diagnostics. 1, 750–764 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kelm, J. M., Timmins, N. E., Brown, C. J., Fussenegger, M. & Nielsen, L. K. Method for generation of homogeneous multicellular tumor spheroids applicable to a wide variety of cell types. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 83, 173–180 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Alam, M. K. et al. Recent advances in microfluidic technology for manipulation and analysis of biological cells (2007–2017). Anal. Chim. Acta. 1044, 29–65 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chen, H., Zhang, Z. & Wang, B. Size- and deformability-based isolation of Circulating tumor cells with microfluidic chips and their applications in clinical studies. AIP Adv. 8, 120701 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Odaka, M. et al. Size distribution analysis with On-Chip Multi-Imaging cell sorter for unlabeled identification of Circulating tumor cells in blood. Micromachines (Basel), 10 154 (2019).

  50. Park, E. S., Duffy, S. P. & Ma, H. Microfluidic separation of Circulating tumor cells based on size and deformability. Methods Mol. Biol. 1634, 21–32 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pang, L. et al. Deformability and size-based cancer cell separation using an integrated microfluidic device. Analyst 140, 7335–7346 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, T. K., Silverman, J. F., Horner, R. D. & Scarantino, C. W. Overlap of nuclear diameters in lung cancer cells. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 12, 275–278 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Lee, T. K. et al. Implications of nuclear diameter in small cell lung carcinoma. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 12, 78–84 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Lee, T. K., Esinhart, J. D., Blackburn, L. D. & Silverman, J. F. The size of small cell lung carcinoma cells. Ratio to lymphocytes and correlation with specimen size and crush artifact. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 14, 32–34 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Hosokawa, M. et al. Size-based isolation of Circulating tumor cells in lung cancer patients using a microcavity array system. PLoS One. 8, e67466 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Shashni, B. et al. Size-Based differentiation of cancer and normal cells by a particle size analyzer assisted by a Cell-Recognition PC software. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 41, 487–503 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Paul, C. D., Mistriotis, P. & Konstantopoulos, K. Cancer cell motility: lessons from migration in confined spaces. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 17, 131–140 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Stroka, K. M., Gu, Z., Sun, S. X. & Konstantopoulos, K. Bioengineering paradigms for cell migration in confined microenvironments. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 30, 41–50 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Hung, W. C. et al. Distinct signaling mechanisms regulate migration in unconfined versus confined spaces. J. Cell. Biol. 202, 807–824 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Park, S., Jang, W. J. & Jeong, C. H. Nano-biomechanical validation of Epithelial-Mesenchymal transition in oral squamous cell carcinomas. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 39, 1488–1495 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Mishra, D. K. et al. Translationally controlled tumor protein (TCTP) is required for TGF-β1 induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and influences cytoskeletal reorganization. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell. Res. 1865, 67–75 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Tworkoski, E., Glucksberg, M. R. & Johnson, M. The effect of the rate of hydrostatic pressure depressurization on cells in culture. PLoS One. 13, e0189890 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Menon, S. & Beningo, K. A. Cancer cell invasion is enhanced by applied mechanical stimulation. PLoS One. 6, e17277 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Grodzinsky, A. J., Levenston, M. E., Jin, M. & Frank, E. H. Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2, 691–713 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Tse, J. M. et al. Mechanical compression drives cancer cells toward invasive phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 109, 911–916 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lavenus, S. B., Tudor, S. M., Ullo, M. F., Vosatka, K. W. & Logue, J. S. A flexible network of vimentin intermediate filaments promotes migration of amoeboid cancer cells through confined environments. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 6700–6709 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Fleissner, F. et al. Tension causes unfolding of intracellular vimentin intermediate filaments. Adv. Biosyst. 4, e2000111 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Doolin, M. T. & Stroka, K. M. Physical confinement alters cytoskeletal contributions towards human mesenchymal stem cell migration. Cytoskeleton 75, 103–117 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Jacobson, E. C. et al. O’Sullivan, migration through a small pore disrupts inactive chromatin organization in neutrophil-like cells. BMC Biol. 16, 142 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Toh, Y. C., Raja, A., Yu, H. & van Noort, D. A 3D microfluidic model to recapitulate cancer cell migration and Invasion, bioengineering (Basel),Bioengineering (Basel) 5 29 (2018).

Download references

Funding

This research work was supported by grants from the Hetao Shenzhen-Hong Kong Science and Technology Innovation Cooperation Zone Shenzhen Park Project (HZQB-KCZYZ-2021017) and City University of Hong Kong (project # 9680217 and 9610559).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences and Tung Biomedical Sciences Centre, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon, Hong Kong

    Md Kowsar Alam, Jiao Zhai, Heng Zou, Yu Chen, Ying Ni & Mengsu Yang

  2. Department of Precision Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology, The City University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Futian Research Institute, Shenzhen, 518057, China

    Md Kowsar Alam, Jiao Zhai, Heng Zou, Yu Chen, Ying Ni & Mengsu Yang

  3. Key Laboratory of Biochip Technology, Biotech and Health Centre, Shenzhen Research Institutes of the City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China

    Md Kowsar Alam, Jiao Zhai, Heng Zou, Yu Chen, Ying Ni & Mengsu Yang

  4. Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’ an Jiaotong University, Xi’, 710004, Shaanxi Province, China

    Yuefeng Ma

  5. Department of Physics, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, 4331, Bangladesh

    Md Kowsar Alam

Authors
  1. Md Kowsar Alam
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuefeng Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jiao Zhai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Heng Zou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yu Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ying Ni
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Mengsu Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MKA conceived the idea, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures, and wrote the manuscript. YM* supervised the project, revised, corrected, and improved the manuscript’s draft. YM and ZJ revised the manuscript and provided insightful comments and suggestions. ZH helped during the experiment by giving suggestions. YC and NY helped analyze the single-cell open array data.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Md Kowsar Alam or Mengsu Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Human and/or animal Ethics and Consent to Participate declarations: Not Applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Supplementary Material 4

Supplementary Material 5

Supplementary Material 6

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alam, M.K., Ma, Y., Zhai, J. et al. Mechano-stress endorsing heterogeneous lung cancer cells migration into confined channels and investigating tumor spheroids growth of confined space migrating cells. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35818-6

Download citation

  • Received: 16 August 2025

  • Accepted: 08 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35818-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Supplementary Material 1Supplementary Material 2Supplementary Material 3Supplementary Material 4Supplementary Material 5
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer