Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
CNN-MLP framework for forest burned areas prediction using PSO-WOA algorithm
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 January 2026

CNN-MLP framework for forest burned areas prediction using PSO-WOA algorithm

  • Mohamed H. Mousa1,
  • Abdullah M. Algamdi1,
  • Yasser Fouad2 &
  • …
  • Ahmed M. Elshewey  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3048-19202,3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1133 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the burned area from forest fires is essential for effective wildfire risk management and mitigation; however, this task remains challenging due to the highly nonlinear relationships and extreme skewness inherent in fire-weather data. This study proposes an optimized hybrid deep learning framework that integrates a Convolutional Neural Network and a Multilayer Perceptron (CNN–MLP) with metaheuristic optimization to enhance burned-area regression accuracy. A wrapper-based Binary Firefly Algorithm (BFA) is employed to identify the most informative subset of meteorological, fire-weather, and spatial features, reducing redundancy and improving generalization. To further optimize model performance, a hybrid Particle Swarm Optimization–Whale Optimization Algorithm (PSO–WOA) is used to tune the hyperparameters of the CNN–MLP architecture automatically. Experiments conducted on the UCI Forest Fires dataset demonstrate that the proposed PSO–WOA–CNN–MLP model significantly outperforms optimized baseline deep learning models, including CNN, MLP, LSTM, and GRU. The proposed model achieves very low prediction errors (Mean Squared Error (MSE) = 0.0093, Mean Absolute Error (MAE = 0.0767, Median Absolute Error (MedAE = 0.0616, Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE = 0.0066) and an exceptional coefficient of determination (R² = 99.89%), indicating near-perfect agreement between predicted and observed burned areas.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available at https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/162/forest+fires.

References

  1. Andrianarivony, H. S. & Akhloufi, M. A. Machine learning and deep learning for wildfire spread prediction: a review. Fire 2024. 7, 482 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, Z. et al. Deep learning for wildfire risk prediction: integrating remote sensing and environmental data. ISPRS J. Photogrammetry Remote Sens. 227, 632–677 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelli, M., Vanneschi, L. & Popovič, A. Predicting burned areas of forest fires: an artificial intelligence approach. Fire Ecol. 11, 106–118 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wood, D. A. Prediction and data mining of burned areas of forest fires: optimized data matching and mining algorithm provides valuable insight. Artif. Intell. Agric. 5, 24–42 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayat, G. & Yildiz, K. Comparison of the machine learning methods to predict wildfire areas. Turkish J. Sci. Technol. Res. Paper. 17, 241–250 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cortez, P. & Morais, A. A Data mining approach to predict forest fires using meteorological data. http://www.dsi.uminho.pt/˜pcortez

  7. Agustyaningrum, C. et al. Forest fire data analysis using conventional machine learning algorithms. 32–37. https://doi.org/10.5220/0012441300003848 (2024).

  8. Mambile, C., Kaijage, S. & Leo, J. Deep learning models for enhanced forest-fire prediction at Mount Kilimanjaro, tanzania: integrating satellite images, weather data and human activities data. Nat. Hazards Res. 5, 335–347 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alizadeh, N., Mahdianpari, M., Hemmati, E., Marjani, M. & FusionFireNet: A CNN-LSTM model for short-term wildfire hotspot prediction utilizing spatio-temporal datasets. Remote Sens. Appl. 37, 101436 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, Z., Huang, Y., Li, X. & Xu, L. Wildland fire burned areas prediction using long short-term memory neural network with attention mechanism. Fire Technol. 57, 1–23 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ragab, M. Hybrid firefly particle swarm optimisation algorithm for feature selection problems. Expert Syst. 41, e13363 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gad, A. G. Particle swarm optimization algorithm and its applications: a systematic review. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2022 29:5 29, 2531–2561 (2022).

  13. Mirjalili, S. & Lewis, A. The Whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95, 51–67 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sharifi, T., Mirsalim, M., Soleimanian Gharehchopogh, F. & Mirjalili, S. Cultural history optimization algorithm: a new human-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for engineering optimization problems. Neural Comput. Appl. 37, 21009–21068 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Anka, F., Gharehchopogh, F. S., Tejani, G. G. & Mousavirad, S. J. Advances in mountain gazelle optimizer: a comprehensive study on its classification and applications. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 2025 18:1 18, 247- (2025).

  16. Hosseinzadeh, M. et al. Improving phishing email detection performance through deep learning with adaptive optimization. Scientific Reports 2025 15:1 15, 36724- (2025).

  17. Eaturu, A. & Vadrevu, K. Evaluation of machine learning and deep learning algorithms for fire prediction in Southeast Asia. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 15–18807 (2025). (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jeon, G., Cho, C., Kim, K. & Choi, W. Deep-learning-based wildfire occurrence prediction with human factors in Gangwon Province, South Korea. Ecol. Inf. 92, 103519 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pang, Y. et al. Forest fire occurrence prediction in China based on machine learning methods. Remote Sens. 2022. 14, 5546 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saha, S., Bera, B., Shit, P. K., Bhattacharjee, S. & Sengupta, N. Prediction of forest fire susceptibility applying machine and deep learning algorithms for conservation priorities of forest resources. Remote Sens. Appl. 29, 100917 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, X., Li, Z., Chen, W., Sun, X. & Gao, D. Forest fire prediction based on long- and short-term time-series network. Forests 2023. 14, 778 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naderpour, M., Rizeei, H. M. & Ramezani, F. Forest fire risk prediction: A Spatial deep neural network-based framework. Remote Sens. 2021. 13, 2513 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Oncel Cekim, H., Güney, C. O., Şentürk, Ö., Özel, G. & Özkan, K. A novel approach for predicting burned forest area. Nat. Hazards. 105, 2187–2201 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang, L., Shi, C. & Zhang, F. Predicting forest fire area growth rate using an ensemble algorithm. Forests 2024. 15, 1493 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sun, X. et al. A forest fire prediction model based on cellular automata and machine learning. IEEE Access. 12, 55389–55403 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karurung, W. S., Lee, K. & Lee, W. Assessment of forest fire vulnerability prediction in indonesia: seasonal variability analysis using machine learning techniques. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 138, 104435 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gao, B. et al. Prediction and driving factors of forest fire occurrence in Jilin Province, China. J. Res. (Harbin). 35, 21 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bhatt, S. & Chouhan, U. An enhanced method for predicting and analysing forest fires using an attention-based CNN model. J. Res. (Harbin). 35, 67 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shadrin, D. et al. Wildfire spreading prediction using multimodal data and deep neural network approach. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 14–2606 (2024). (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Jayasingh, S. K., Swain, S., Patra, K. J. & Gountia, D. An experimental approach to detect forest fire using machine learning mathematical models and IoT. SN Comput. Sci. 5, 148 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Su, Y. et al. FC-StackGNB: A novel machine learning modeling framework for forest fire risk prediction combining feature crosses and model fusion algorithm. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112577 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yun, B., Zheng, Y., Lin, Z., Li, T. & FFYOLO A lightweight forest fire detection model based on YOLOv8. Fire 2024. 7, 93 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Roh, M., Lee, S., Jo, H. W. & Lee, W. K. Development of a forest fire diagnostic model based on machine learning techniques. Forests 2024. 15, 1103 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. UCI Machine Learning Repository. https://archive.ics.uci.edu/dataset/162/forest+fires

  35. Malakouti, S. M. From accurate to actionable: interpretable PM2.5 forecasting with feature engineering and SHAP for the Liverpool–Wirral region. Environ. Challenges. 21, 101290 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Malakouti, S. M. Leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and fuzzy logic for efficient rainfall forecasts. Scientific Reports 2025 15:1 15, 36499- (2025).

  37. Elshewey, A. M., El-Bakry, H. M. & Osman, A. M. Enhancing water potability classification using a hybrid GRU with LSTM deep learning models based on relief algorithm and bayesian optimization. Evol. Syst. 17, 10 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Fahim, A., Osman, A. M., Tarek, Z. & Elshewey, A. M. Enhancing air quality index classification based on ensemble machine learning techniques. Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 15, 29325–29333 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qiao, J. et al. A hybrid particle swarm optimization algorithm for solving engineering problem. Sci. Rep. 14 (1), 14–8357 (2024). (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Elshewey, A. M., Osman, A. M., Youssef, R. Y., El-Bakry, H. M. & Hassan, S. A. Z. Enhancing forest fires classification using a hybrid convolutional and BiLSTM deep learning model. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. 11, 379 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mambile, C., Kaijage, S. & Leo, J. Application of deep learning in forest fire prediction: a systematic review. IEEE Access. 12, 190554–190581 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Alkhatib, R., Sahwan, W., Alkhatieb, A. & Schütt, B. A brief review of machine learning algorithms in forest fires science. Appl. Sci. 2023. 13, 8275 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Al Janabi, S., Al Shourbaji, I. & Salman, M. A. Assessing the suitability of soft computing approaches for forest fires prediction. Appl. Comput. Inf. 14, 214–224 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kerdprasop, N., Poomka, P., Chuaybamroong, P. & Kerdprasop, K. Forest fire area Estimation using support vector machine as an approximator. Int. Joint Conf. Comput. Intell. 1, 269–273 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nguyen Da, T., Nguyen Thanh, P. & Cho, M. Y. A cloud 15 kV-HDPE insulator leakage current classification based improved particle swarm optimization and LSTM-CNN deep learning approach. Swarm Evol. Comput. 91, 101755 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nguyen Thanh, P. & Cho, M. Y. Advanced AIoT for failure classification of industrial diesel generators based hybrid deep learning CNN-BiLSTM algorithm. Adv. Eng. Inform. 62, 102644 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nguyen-Da, T., Nguyen-Thanh, P. & Cho, M. Y. Real-time AIoT anomaly detection for industrial diesel generator based an efficient deep learning CNN-LSTM in industry 4.0. Internet Things. 27, 101280 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen, T. P., Lin, C. C. & Cho, M. Y. Fault detection of industrial air separation stations based on metaheuristic optimization and bidirectional long short-term memory technique. Internet Things. 36, 101850 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, under grant No. (UJ-25-DR-20568). Therefore, the authors thank the University of Jeddah for its technical and financial support.

Funding

This work was funded by the University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, under grant No. (UJ-25-DR-20568). Therefore, the authors thank the University of Jeddah for its technical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, 21493, Saudi Arabia

    Mohamed H. Mousa & Abdullah M. Algamdi

  2. Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Suez University, P.O.Box:43221, Suez, Egypt

    Yasser Fouad & Ahmed M. Elshewey

  3. Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

    Ahmed M. Elshewey

Authors
  1. Mohamed H. Mousa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdullah M. Algamdi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasser Fouad
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ahmed M. Elshewey
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mohamed H. Mousa: Writing, Project administration, and Conceptualization. Abdullah M. Algamdi: Writing, Investigation, and Project Administration. Ahmed M. Elshewey: prepared figures and recorded the table results. Yasser Fouad: Wrote the main manuscript, edited, and performed Formal analysis. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed H. Mousa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mousa, M.H., Algamdi, A.M., Fouad, Y. et al. CNN-MLP framework for forest burned areas prediction using PSO-WOA algorithm. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35836-4

Download citation

  • Received: 02 December 2025

  • Accepted: 08 January 2026

  • Published: 10 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35836-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Forest fire prediction
  • Burned area estimation, hybrid CNN-MLP model
  • Feature selection
  • CNN-MLP
  • Intelligent wildfire management
  • Deep learning
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Hyperparameter tuning
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics