Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Influence of confining pressure and stress amplitude on the mechanical properties and permeability characteristics of coal
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 January 2026

Influence of confining pressure and stress amplitude on the mechanical properties and permeability characteristics of coal

  • Huiming Yang1,
  • Dengke Qin2,
  • Hao Liu3,
  • Xiaoyan Sun4,
  • Qican Ran2 &
  • …
  • Yulin Hu2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 260 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Materials science
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

To explore the influence mechanism of confining pressure and stress amplitude on the mechanical properties and permeability characteristics of coal samples, loading and unloading experiments with different confining pressures and amplitudes were performed with a triaxial test system. The stress‒strain, permeability and energy changes of the coal samples were monitored in real time, and the stress response, energy evolution, creep deformation and fracture distribution characteristics were systematically analyzed. The experimental results reveal that with increasing confining pressure, the peak stress and elastic modulus of coal samples increase significantly, the input energy and elastic energy increase synchronously, and the permeability and fracture ratio decrease significantly. High confining pressure effectively inhibits fracture expansion, making the structure of the coal sample more regular after destruction; as a whole, the fractal dimension decreases, and the structure tends to be simplified and densified. In contrast, the increase in loading and unloading amplitude accelerates the structural failure and fatigue damage process of coal samples, resulting in a decrease in peak strength, an increase in irreversible strain, crack expansion and penetration, an increase in the fracture proportion and fractal dimension, and a significant increase in permeability. The results of three-dimensional fracture reconstruction further confirm the significant effect of confining pressure and amplitude on the evolution of the fracture spatial structure. An increase in confining pressure helps to close microcracks and compact pore channels, whereas a large-amplitude disturbance induces fracture penetration and the formation of a flow network.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Liang, Y. P. et al. Characteristics of overburden fracture conductivity in the shallow buried close coal seam group and its effect on low-oxygen phenomena. Phys. Fluids, 37(4) (2025).

  2. Liang, Y. P. et al. Mechanical properties and crack propagation characteristics of mudstone under different loading frequencies. Eng. Fract. Mech. 316, 110863 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shan, P. F. et al. Research on the response mechanism of coal rock mass under stress and pressure. Materials 16(8), 3235 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Khan, M. et al. Predicting deformation kinetics and fractures propagation in coal-rock masses using acoustic emission testing. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol., 12(1). (2025).

  5. Ran, Q. C. et al. Mechanical Deterioration and Crack Propagation Characteristics of Mudstone Under Cyclic Loading: Insights from Acoustic Emission Fractal Analysis (Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2025).

  6. Ma, T. F. et al. Regulation mechanism of surfactant-SiO2 nanoparticle compound on mechanical property and microstructure of coal: Effect of the type of surfactant. Powder Technol. 466, 121459 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zou, Q. L. et al. Mesomechanical weakening mechanism of coal modified by nanofluids with disparately sized SiO2 nanoparticles. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 188, 106056 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gale, W. J. A review of energy associated with coal bursts. Int. J. Min. Sci. Techno. 28 (5), 755–761 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tang, W. et al. The influence of borehole arrangement of soundless cracking demolition agents (SCDAs) on weakening the hard rock. Int. J. Min. Sci. Techno. 31 (2), 197–207 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liang, Y. P. et al. Response characteristics of coal subjected to hydraulic fracturing: an evaluation based on real-time monitoring of borehole strain and acoustic emission. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 38, 402–411 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adibee, N., Osanloo, M. & Rahmanpour, M. Adverse effects of coal mine waste dumps on the environment and their management. Environ. Earth Sci. 70 (4), 1581–1592 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, T. et al. Effect of cyclic water injection on the wettability of coal with different SiO < sub > 2 nanofluid treatment time. Fuel 312, 122922 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ma, T. F. et al. Multi-stage evolution characteristics and particle size effect of sandstone granules subjected to cyclic loads. Eng. Fract. Mech. 312, 110614 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hu, Y. L. et al. Gas drainage optimization via fracture network characterization in coal mining. Phys. Fluids, 37(7). (2025).

  15. Ye, C. F. et al. Progressive Failure Mechanism and Shear Strength Model of Granite Under Cyclic Direct Shear (Rock Mech Rock Eng, 2025).

  16. Hokka, M. et al. Effects of strain rate and confining pressure on the compressive behavior of Kuru granite. Int. J. Impact Eng. 91, 183–193 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dan Huang, Q. J. Grouting optimization for tunnel water-inrush disaster mitigation in jointed rock masses using discrete fracture network modeling[J]. Geohazard Mech. 3 (4), 261–271 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, J. et al. Monitoring of surface subsidence disasters and evolution laws caused by multiple mining activities in coal mines based on SBAS-InSAR[J]. Geohazard Mech. 3 (4), 286–296 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bagde, M. N. & Petros, V. Fatigue properties of intact sandstone samples subjected to dynamic uniaxial cyclical loading. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 42 (2), 237–250 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Huang, Y. H., Yang, S. Q. & Zhao, J. Three-Dimensional numerical simulation on triaxial failure mechanical behavior of Rock-Like specimen containing two unparallel fissures. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 49 (12), 4711–4729 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, Y. & Dai, F. A review of experimental and theoretical research on the deformation and failure behavior of rocks subjected to Cyclic loading. J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. 13 (5), 1203–1230 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jia, C. et al. Characterization of the deformation behavior of fine-grained sandstone by triaxial Cyclic loading. Constr. Build. Mater. 162, 113–123 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang, M. W., Meng, Q. B. & Liu, S. D. Energy Evolution Characteristics and Distribution Laws of Rock Materials under Triaxial Cyclic Loading and Unloading Compression. Adv. Mat. Sci. Eng. 2017, 5471571 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liang, Y. et al. Experimental study of mechanical behaviors and failure characteristics of coal under true triaxial Cyclic loading and unloading and stress rotation. Nat. Resour. Res. 31 (2), 971–991 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, Y. et al. Effect of unloading rate on the mechanical behavior and fracture characteristics of sandstones under complex triaxial stress conditions. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 54 (9), 4851–4866 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Qin, D. K. et al. Mechanical properties and failure mechanism of mudstone subjected to Cyclic loads with variable loading limit. Phys. Fluids. 37(5) (2025).

  27. Ye, C. F. et al. Nonlinear progressive failure mechanism and shear strength model of deeply buried jinping marble under direct shear. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 198, 106380 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shen, J. Y., Wan, L. & Zuo, J. P. Non-linear shear strength model for coal rocks. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 52 (10), 4123–4132 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chen, Y. Q. et al. Crack growth in Westerly granite during a Cyclic loading test. Eng. Geol. 117 (3-4), 189–197 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ran, Q. et al. Hardening-damage evolutionary mechanism of sandstone under multi-level cyclic loading. Eng. Fract. Mech. 307, 110291 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou, Z. L. et al. Mechanical behavior of red sandstone under Cyclic point loading. T Nonferr Metal Soc. 25 (8), 2708–2717 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Liu, X. S. et al. Damage constitutive model based on energy dissipation for intact rock subjected to Cyclic loading. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 85, 27–32 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, X. W. et al. Investigation of deformation and failure characteristics and energy evolution of sandstone under Cyclic loading and unloading. Rock. Soil. Mech. 42 (6), 1693–1704 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y. et al. Fracture evolution and energy characteristics during marble failure under triaxial fatigue Cyclic and confining pressure unloading (FC-CPU) conditions. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 54 (2), 799–818 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sukplum, W. & Wannakao, L. Influence of confining pressure on the mechanical behavior of Phu Kradung sandstone. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 86, 48–54 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Feng, G. et al. Thermal effects on prediction accuracy of dense granite mechanical behaviors using modified maximum tangential stress criterion. J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. 15 (7), 1734–1748 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zou, G. G. et al. Influence of geological factors on coal permeability in the Sihe coal mine. Int. J. Coal Sci. Technol. 9(1), 6 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Quanle, Z. O. U. et al. Effect of initial fracture angle on the failure pattern and gas flow channel of sandstone under multistage loading. J. Rock. Mech. Geotech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2025.12.017 (2026).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Du, K. et al. Experimental study on acoustic emission (AE) characteristics and crack classification during rock fracture in several basic lab tests. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 133, 104411 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li, B. et al. Experimental investigation on compaction characteristics and permeability evolution of broken coal. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 118, 63–76 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zhu, J. et al. Characteristics of permeability evolution and pore structure of coal with high gas. Energies 17(1), 66 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhang, B. C. et al. Effect of stress amplitude on mechanical and acoustic emission of sandstone under constant-cyclic loading. B Eng. Geol. Environ. 82(7), 284 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zou, Q. L. et al. Morphological evolution and flow conduction characteristics of fracture channels in fractured sandstone under Cyclic loading and unloading. Int. J. Min. Sci. Techno. 33 (12), 1527–1540 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ran, Q. C. et al. Deterioration mechanisms of coal mechanical properties under uniaxial multi-level cyclic loading considering initial damage effects. Int. J. Rock. Mech. Min. 186, 106006 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Su, E. et al. Relationship between pore structure and mechanical properties of bituminous coal under sub-critical and super-critical CO2 treatment. Energy 280, 128155 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ma, T. F. et al. Compaction and re-crushing characteristics of sandstone granules with different gradations under cyclic loading. Adv. Powder Technol. 35(9), 104611 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhou, H. W. et al. On acoustic emission and Post-peak energy evolution in Beishan granite under Cyclic loading. Rock. Mech. Rock. Eng. 52 (1), 283–288 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brace, W. F., Walsh, J. B. & Frangos, W. T. Permeability of granite under high pressure. J. Phys. Res. 73 (6), 2225– (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Liu Huihui. Evolution characteristics of main controlling factors of coal seam gas seepage and its impact on gas extraction control mechanism. (2020).

  50. Bai, X. Z. et al. Analysis of top-hat selection transformation and some modified top-hat transformations. Optik 123 (10), 892–895 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Open Fund Project Funded by State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control(2022SKLKF02)and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52274246).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Prevention and Control, Chongqing, 400037, China

    Huiming Yang

  2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control, School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Dengke Qin, Qican Ran & Yulin Hu

  3. College of Aerospace Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400044, China

    Hao Liu

  4. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Henan University of Engineering, Zhengzhou, 451191, China

    Xiaoyan Sun

Authors
  1. Huiming Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dengke Qin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hao Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaoyan Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Qican Ran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yulin Hu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

H.M. Y -Manuscript main textD.K. Q-Paper diagramH. L-ReviewX.Y. S-methodQ.C.R-Guide the experimentY.L. H-proofread.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dengke Qin or Hao Liu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, H., Qin, D., Liu, H. et al. Influence of confining pressure and stress amplitude on the mechanical properties and permeability characteristics of coal. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35979-4

Download citation

  • Received: 16 October 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 23 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35979-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Confining pressure
  • Amplitude
  • Mechanical properties
  • Permeability characteristics
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing