Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Postural stability during a longitudinal expedition in an isolated and confined Antarctic environment
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 January 2026

Postural stability during a longitudinal expedition in an isolated and confined Antarctic environment

  • Petr Volf1,
  • Marek Sokol1,
  • Lýdie Leová1,
  • Jan Hejda1 &
  • …
  • Patrik Kutílek2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 196 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Neuroscience
  • Physiology

Abstract

Postural stability is critical for safety in extreme environments like Antarctica, where falls pose a significant risk to expedition crews. However, systematic longitudinal studies from this setting are lacking. In the first such study, we repeatedly assessed postural control in thirteen members of a 49-day Antarctic mission using a low-cost, autonomous system under four sensory conditions (firm surface vs. compliant surface \(\times\) \(\times\) eyes open vs. eyes closed). We hypothesized that postural stability would initially deteriorate due to acute stress and environmental novelty, followed by gradual recovery and adaptation over the mid-term . Our comprehensive analysis revealed a marked deterioration of stability when visual or proprioceptive input was compromised, manifesting as increased sway and a shift toward less complex, more persistent control dynamics. Contrary to our hypothesis, no systematic longitudinal adaptation was detected. These findings highlight the increased reliance on visual information when proprioceptive cues are unreliable and suggest that postural strategies remain remarkably stable during a medium-term polar mission. Despite its known technical limitations, our work demonstrates the practical feasibility of using this autonomous system for field stabilometry in isolated environments.

Similar content being viewed by others

Lifespan changes in postural control

Article Open access 11 January 2023

Autonomic regulation across sleep and wake during an Antarctic overwintering

Article Open access 14 January 2026

Cortical midfrontal theta dynamics following foot strike may index response adaptation during reactive stepping

Article Open access 22 October 2022

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the study are not publicly available due to ethical considerations and participant protection, but they are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sokol, M. et al. Antarctic expedition at jg mendel station: an operational and scientific overview and its potential as a space analog environment. Acta Astronaut. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2025.11.023 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Woollacott, M. & Shumway-Cook, A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 16, 1–14 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stahn, A. C. et al. Brain changes in response to long antarctic expeditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 2273–2275. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1904905 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mäkinen, T. M. et al. Postural sway during single and repeated cold exposures. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 76, 947–953 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chang, W.-R., Chang, C.-C., Lesch, M. F. & Matz, S. Gait adaptation on surfaces with different degrees of slipperiness. Appl. Ergon. 59, 333–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.09.008 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Palinkas, L. A. & Suedfeld, P. Psychological effects of polar expeditions. The Lancet 371, 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61056-3 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hrbáček, F., Kňažková, M., Láska, K. & Pastíriková, L. K. Active layer warming and thickening on calm-s jgm, james ross island, in the period 2013/14-2022/23. Permafrost Periglac. Process. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp.2274 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barry, R. G. & Hall-McKim, E. A. Polar Environments and Global Change (Cambridge University Press, 2018).

  9. Micenková, L. et al. Permafrost as a source of mineral weathering bacteria: implications of active layer thickening on james ross island, antarctica. CATENA 249, 108694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108694 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao, C., Oksa, J., Rintamäki, H. & Holmér, I. Gait muscle activity during walking on an inclined icy surface. Ind. Health 46, 15–22. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.46.15 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, A. An interview with alexander kumar at concordia station, Antarctica. Astrobiology.com (2012, accessed 1 Sep 2025).

  12. European Space Agency. Antarctica – a bonebreaker? part 1. ESA Blogs – Chronicles from Concordia (2019, accessed 1 Sep 2025).

  13. U.S. National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General. Evaluation of Safety and Health Concerns in the U.S. Antarctic Program. Technical Report 25-03-001, U.S. National Science Foundation Office of Inspector General (2025).

  14. Lowe, J. & Warner, M. Optimising remote health care delivery in antarctica: a review of the current capabilities utilised in the british antarctic territory. Int. J. Circumpolar Health 82, 2230633. https://doi.org/10.1080/22423982.2023.2230633 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Park, D.-S. & Lee, G. Validity and reliability of balance assessment software using the nintendo wii balance board: usability and validation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 11, 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-99 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nagymate, G., Vamos, B. & Kiss, R. M. Validation of the nintendo wii balance board for stabilometry measurements. In 2016 International Symposium on Small-scale Intelligent Manufacturing Systems (SIMS) 111–114 (IEEE, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/sims.2016.7802909.

  17. Hua, A. et al. Nonlinear dynamics of postural control system under visual-vestibular habituation balance practice: evidence from eeg, emg and center of pressure signals. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 18, 1371648. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2024.1371648 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zatsiorsky, V. M. & Duarte, M. Rambling and trembling in quiet standing. Mot. Control 4, 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1123/mcj.4.2.185 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shumway-Cook, A. & Horak, F. B. Assessing the influence of sensory interaction on balance: suggestion from the field. Phys. Ther. 66, 1548–1550. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/66.10.1548 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  20. The Qt Company. PySide6: Qt for Python (2025).

  21. Natesh M Bhat. pyttsx3: Text-to-Speech for Python (2025).

  22. Ospina, R. & Marmolejo-Ramos, F. Performance of some estimators of relative variability. Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 5, 43. https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2019.00043 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Scoppa, F., Capra, R., Gallamini, M. & Shiffer, R. Clinical stabilometry standardization: basic definitions-acquisition interval-sampling frequency. Gait Posture 37, 290–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.009 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fritsch, F. N. & Carlson, R. E. Monotone piecewise cubic interpolation. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 17, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1137/0717021 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koltermann, J. J., Gerber, M., Beck, H. & Beck, M. Validation of various filters and sampling parameters for a cop analysis. Technologies 6, 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6020056 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Salavati, M. et al. Test-retest reliability of center of pressure measures of postural stability during quiet standing in a group with musculoskeletal disorders consisting of low back pain, anterior cruciate ligament injury and functional ankle instability. Gait Posture 29, 460–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.11.016 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prieto, T. E., Myklebust, J. B., Hoffmann, R. G., Lovett, E. G. & Myklebust, B. M. Measures of postural steadiness: differences between healthy young and elderly adults. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43, 956–966. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.532130 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Curran, K., Holland, G., Redfern, M. S. & Cham, R. Comparing sensory organization test measures of the bertec® balance advantage® cdp/ivrtm and neurocom® smart equitest® computerized dynamic posturography systems in young and older healthy adults. Gait Posture https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.05.017 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Welch, P. D. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. 15, 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Fujimoto, C. et al. Power spectral analysis of postural sway during foam posturography in patients with peripheral vestibular dysfunction. Otol. Neurotol. 35, e317–e323. https://doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000000554 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sozzi, S., Ghai, S. & Schieppati, M. Incongruity of geometric and spectral markers in the assessment of body sway. Front. Neurol. 13, 929132. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.929132 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Doyle, T. L., Newton, R. U. & Burnett, A. F. Reliability of traditional and fractal dimension measures of quiet stance center of pressure in young, healthy people. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86, 2034–2040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2005.05.014 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Higuchi, T. Approach to an irregular time series on the basis of the fractal theory. Phys. D 31, 277–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(88)90081-4 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Vallat, R. AntroPy: entropy and complexity of time-series in python (2025). Version 0.1.9.

  35. Peng, C.-K., Havlin, S., Stanley, H. E. & Goldberger, A. L. Quantification of scaling exponents and crossover phenomena in nonstationary heartbeat time series. Chaos Interdiscipl. J. Nonlinear Sci. 5, 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166141 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schölzel, C. Nonlinear measures for dynamical systems. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3814723 (2019). Version 0.5.2.

  37. Rosenstein, M. T., Collins, J. J. & De Luca, C. J. A practical method for calculating largest lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys. D 65, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Apthorp, D., Nagle, F. & Palmisano, S. Chaos in balance: non-linear measures of postural control predict individual variations in visual illusions of motion. PLoS ONE 9, e113897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113897 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Chung, C. C., Soangra, R. & Lockhart, T. E. Recurrence quantitative analysis of postural sway using force plate and smartphone. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58 1271–1275 (SAGE Publications, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931214581265.

  40. Seigle, B., Ramdani, S. & Bernard, P. L. Dynamical structure of center of pressure fluctuations in elderly people. Gait Posture 30, 223–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.05.005 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Costa, M., Goldberger, A. L. & Peng, C.-K. Multiscale entropy analysis of complex physiologic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 068102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.068102 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bao, F. S., Liu, X. & Zhang, C. Pyeeg: an open source python module for eeg/meg feature extraction. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 406391. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/406391 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Richman, J. S. & Moorman, J. R. Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy. Am. J. Physiol.-Heart Circul. Physiol. 278, H2039–H2049. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.H2039 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Busa, M. A. & van Emmerik, R. E. Multiscale entropy: A tool for understanding the complexity of postural control. J. Sport Health Sci. 5, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2016.01.018 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Anagnostou, E. et al. Romberg’s test revisited: changes in classical and advanced sway metrics in patients with pure sensory neuropathy. Neurophysiol. Clin. 54, 102999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2024.102999 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wilcoxon, F. Individual comparisons by ranking methods. In Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution 196–202 (Springer, 1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_16.

  47. Pratt, J. W. Remarks on zeros and ties in the wilcoxon signed rank procedures. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 54, 655–667. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1959.10501526 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hodges Jr, J. L. & Lehmann, E. L. Estimates of location based on rank tests. In Selected Works of E. L. Lehmann 287–300 (Springer, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1412-4_25.

  49. Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J. Roy. Stat. Soc.: Ser. B (Methodol.) 57, 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Laird, N. M. & Ware, J. H. Random-effects models for longitudinal data. Biometrics 1982, 963–974. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529876 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Satterthwaite, F. E. An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometr. Bull. 2, 110–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3002019 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. lmertest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i1 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Peterka, R. J. Sensorimotor integration in human postural control. J. Neurophysiol. 88, 1097–1118. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2002.88.3.1097 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Assländer, L. & Peterka, R. J. Sensory reweighting dynamics following removal and addition of visual and proprioceptive cues. J. Neurophysiol. 116, 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01145.2015 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Cornilleau-Pérès, V. et al. Measurement of the visual contribution to postural steadiness from the cop movement: methodology and reliability. Gait Posture 22, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.07.009 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Chander, H. et al. Impact of occupational footwear and workload on postural stability in work safety. Work 64, 817–824. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-193043 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Chander, H. et al. Sensory organization test conditions influence postural strategy rather than footwear or workload. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18, 10511. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910511 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Czech Antarctic Research Programme (CARP), Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, for logistical assistance and access to the J. G. Mendel Czech Antarctic Station.

Funding

This work was supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic, grant TM05000017 ”Portable modular MoCap system for recording and evaluating the condition of members of the armed forces and first responders”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Care and Population Protection, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic

    Petr Volf, Marek Sokol, Lýdie Leová & Jan Hejda

  2. Department of Military Medical Service Organisation and Management, Military Faculty of Medicine, University of Defence, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic

    Patrik Kutílek

Authors
  1. Petr Volf
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marek Sokol
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lýdie Leová
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jan Hejda
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Patrik Kutílek
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.V.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Investigation, Writing – Original Draft. M.S.: Formal Analysis, Data Curation, Software, Writing – Original Draft, L.L.: Investigation, Visualization, Writing – Review & Editing. J.H.: Investigation, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing. P.K.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Volf.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volf, P., Sokol, M., Leová, L. et al. Postural stability during a longitudinal expedition in an isolated and confined Antarctic environment. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36215-9

Download citation

  • Received: 09 September 2025

  • Accepted: 09 January 2026

  • Published: 22 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36215-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing