Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Data-driven optimization of machining parameters for Hastelloy C276 using PSO and TLBO frameworks
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 15 January 2026

Data-driven optimization of machining parameters for Hastelloy C276 using PSO and TLBO frameworks

  • Mosleh M. Abualhaj1,
  • B. Venkatesh2,
  • Kiran D. Parmar3,
  • Akanksha Mishra4,
  • D. T. Arunkumar5,
  • Ripendeep Singh6,
  • Abinash Mahapatro7,
  • V. K. Bupesh Raja8,
  • Abhijit Bhowmik9,10 &
  • …
  • Yalew Tamene11 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 986 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Materials science
  • Mathematics and computing

Abstract

Hastelloy C276 is renowned for its exceptional resistance to corrosion and elevated temperatures, rendering it a preferred material for aerospace and chemical processing applications. However, its high strength and work-hardening tendency pose significant challenges during machining. This study systematically investigates the machinability of Hastelloy C276 under four sustainable lubrication and cooling environments—dry machining, minimum quantity lubrication (MQL), nano-enhanced MQL (NMQL), and cryogenic CO₂ (CCO₂). Experiments were designed using a Taguchi L16 orthogonal array, and the influence of cutting speed and feed rate on surface roughness, cutting force, tool wear, and cutting temperature was analysed using ANOVA. Compared to dry machining, cryogenic CO₂ cooling resulted in a reduction of surface roughness and cutting force by approximately 30–40%, along with a substantial decrease in tool wear and cutting temperature, whereas NMQL demonstrated moderate improvements due to enhanced lubrication at the tool–chip interface. ANOVA results revealed that feed rate and cutting speed were the most significant parameters, contributing up to 38.35% and 48.56% to variations in surface roughness and cutting temperature, respectively. To identify optimal machining conditions, Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) and Teaching–Learning-Based Optimization (TLBO) algorithms were employed. Over 100 iterations, PSO achieved a higher optimization success rate of 83.6% compared to 79.1% for TLBO, while TLBO exhibited faster convergence with a computation time of 6.5 s against 9 s for PSO. The findings demonstrate that cryogenic CO₂-assisted machining combined with evolutionary optimization provides an effective and sustainable strategy for enhancing the machinability of Hastelloy C276.

Similar content being viewed by others

Technoeconomic and environmental analysis of cryogenic and MQL-assisted machining of Hastelloy X

Article Open access 01 July 2025

A Multi-Objective optimization framework for the sustainable machining of Monel 400

Article Open access 10 July 2025

Hybrid cryo-nano MQL strategy for sustainable and high-performance machining of Monel 400

Article Open access 28 December 2025

Data availability

Data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Aydın, K., Özlü, B. & Uğur, L. Investigation of machining performance of Ti6Al4V alloy in face milling process considering the energy consumption and carbon emission. Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 1–21. (2025).

  2. Nas, E. & Kara, F. Optimization of EDM machinability of Hastelloy C22 super alloys. Machines 10 (12), 1131 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hamıd, M. W. H., Özlü, B., Ulaş, H. B. & Demir, H. Prediction of cutting parameters and reduction of output parameters using machine learning in milling of inconel 718 alloy. Sci. Rep. 15 (1), 33309 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Akgün, M., Özlü, B. & Kara, F. Effect of PVD-TiN and CVD-Al2O3 coatings on cutting force, surface roughness, cutting power, and temperature in hard turning of AISI H13 steel. J. Mater. Eng. Perform. 32 (3), 1390–1401 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arun, M. Experimental investigation on energy and exergy analysis of solar water heating system using zinc oxide-based nanofluid. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 48 (3), 3977–3988 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ramana, M. V. et al. Effect of machining conditions on shear angle in turning of A286 iron based nickel super alloy. Mater. Today Proc., 44, 2319–2324. (2021).

  7. Arun, M. & Gopan, G. Effects of natural light on improving the lighting and energy efficiency of buildings: toward low energy consumption and CO2 emission. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 20, 1047–1056 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Arun, M. Investigation of a deep learning-based waste recovery framework for sustainability and a clean environment using IoT. Sustainable Food Technol. 3 (2), 599–611 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kara, F. Investigation of the effect of Al2O3 nanoparticle-added MQL lubricant on sustainable and clean manufacturing. Lubricants 12 (11), 393 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Özbek, N. A., Karadag, M. İ. & Özbek, O. Optimization of flank wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 stainless steel using the Taguchi method. Mater. Test. 62 (9), 957–961 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pandey, K. & Datta, S. Machinability Study of Inconel 825 Superalloy Under Nanofluid MQL: Application of Sunflower Oil as a Base Cutting Fluid with MWCNTs and nano-Al 2O3 as Additives 151 (Sustainable Manufacturing and Design, 2021).

  12. Li, B. et al. Heat transfer performance of MQL grinding with different nanofluids for Ni-based alloys using vegetable oil. J. Clean. Prod. 154, 1–11 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wu, Y. et al. In-situ EBSD study on twinning activity caused by deep cryogenic treatment (DCT) for an as-cast AZ31 Mg alloy. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 30, 3840–3850 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Özlü, B., Ulaş, H. B. & Kara, F. Investigation of the effects of cutting tool coatings and machining conditions on cutting force, specific energy consumption, surface roughness, cutting temperature, and tool wear in the milling of Ti6Al4V alloy. Lubricants 13 (8), 363 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Danish, M. et al. Thermal analysis during turning of AZ31 magnesium alloy under dry and cryogenic conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 91, 2855–2868 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Özbek, O. Evaluation of nano fluids with minimum quantity lubrication in turning of Ni-base Superalloy UDIMET 720. Lubricants 11 (4), 159 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Altan Özbek, N., Özbek, O., Kara, F. & Saruhan, H. Effect of eco-friendly minimum quantity lubrication in hard machining of Vanadis 10: a high strength steel. Steel Res. Int. 93 (7), 2100587 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Khan, M. M. A., Mithu, M. A. H. & Dhar, N. R. Effects of minimum quantity lubrication on turning AISI 9310 alloy steel using vegetable oil-based cutting fluid. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 209 (15–16), 5573–5583 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuram, E., Ozcelik, B., Bayramoglu, M., Demirbas, E. & Simsek, B. T. Optimization of cutting fluids and cutting parameters during end milling by using D-optimal design of experiments. J. Clean. Prod. 42, 159–166 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Debnath, S., Reddy, M. M. & Yi, Q. S. Environmental friendly cutting fluids and cooling techniques in machining: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 83, 33–47 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Y. et al. Experimental evaluation of the lubrication properties of the wheel/workpiece interface in minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding using different types of vegetable oils. J. Clean. Prod. 127, 487–499 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mia, M., Gupta, M. K., Singh, G., Królczyk, G. & Pimenov, D. Y. An approach to cleaner production for machining hardened steel using different cooling-lubrication conditions. J. Clean. Prod. 187, 1069–1081 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Krämer, A., Klocke, F., Sangermann, H. & Lung, D. Influence of the lubricoolant strategy on thermo-mechanical tool load. CIRP J. Manufact. Sci. Technol. 7 (1), 40–47 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kishore, K., Chauhan, S. R. & Sinha, M. K. Application of machine learning techniques in environmentally benign surface grinding of inconel 625. Tribol. Int. 188, 108812 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dhananchezian, M. & Kumar, M. P. Cryogenic turning of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy with modified cutting tool inserts. Cryogenics 51 (1), 34–40 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Ghamdi, K. A., Iqbal, A. & Hussain, G. Machinability comparison of AISI 4340 and Ti-6Al-4V under cryogenic and hybrid cooling environments: A knowledge engineering approach. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part. B: J. Eng. Manuf. 229 (12), 2144–2164 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shokrani, A., Dhokia, V. & Newman, S. T. Investigation of the effects of cryogenic machining on surface integrity in CNC end milling of Ti–6Al–4V titanium alloy. J. Manuf. Process. 21, 172–179 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iqbal, A. et al. Sustainable milling of Ti-6Al-4V: investigating the effects of milling orientation, cutter′ s helix angle, and type of cryogenic coolant. Metals 10 (2), 258 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Schoop, J., Sales, W. F. & Jawahir, I. S. High speed cryogenic finish machining of Ti-6Al4V with polycrystalline diamond tools. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 250, 1–8 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sadik, M. I. & Isakson, S. The role of PVD coating and coolant nature in wear development and tool performance in cryogenic and wet milling of Ti-6Al-4V. Wear 386, 204–210 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bordin, A., Sartori, S., Bruschi, S. & Ghiotti, A. Experimental investigation on the feasibility of dry and cryogenic machining as sustainable strategies when turning Ti6Al4V produced by additive manufacturing. J. Clean. Prod. 142, 4142–4151 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Danish, M. et al. Machinability investigations on CFRP composites: a comparison between sustainable cooling conditions. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 114, 3201–3216 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma, P., Kishore, K., Singh, V. & Sinha, M. K. Optimization of process parameters for better surface morphology of electrical discharge machining-processed inconel 825 using hybrid response surface methodology-desirability function and multi-objective genetic algorithm approaches. J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 1–17. (2023).

  34. Sinha, M. K., Kishore, K. & Kumar, R. Archana, Hybrid approach for modelling and optimizing MQL grinding of inconel 625 with machine learning and MCDM techniques. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM), 1–17. (2024).

  35. Pan, F., Zhang, Q., Liu, J., Li, W. & Gao, Q. Consensus analysis for a class of stochastic PSO algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 23, 567–578 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Li, G., Niu, P., Zhang, W. & Liu, Y. Model nox emissions by least squares support vector machine with tuning based on ameliorated teaching–learning-based optimization. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 126, 11–20 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yu, K., Wang, X. & Wang, Z. Self-adaptive multi-objective teaching-learning-based optimization and its application in ethylene cracking furnace operation optimization. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 146, 198–210 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chen, D., Zou, F., Li, Z., Wang, J. & Li, S. An improved teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm for solving global optimization problem. Inf. Sci. 297, 171–190 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J. & Vakharia, D. P. Teaching–learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput. Aided Des. 43 (3), 303–315 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rao, R. V., Savsani, V. J. & Vakharia, D. P. Teaching–learning-based optimization: an optimization method for continuous non-linear large scale problems. Inf. Sci. 183 (1), 1–15 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zou, F., Chen, D. & Xu, Q. A survey of teaching–learning-based optimization. Neurocomputing 335, 366–383 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Akhlaghi, M. Optimization of the plasmonic nano-rods-based absorption coefficient using TLBO algorithm. Optik 126 (24), 5033–5037 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kennedy, J. & Eberhart, R. Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of ICNN’95-international conference on neural networks (Vol. 4, pp. 1942–1948). IEEE. (1995).

  44. Jain, M., Saihjpal, V., Singh, N. & Singh, S. B. An overview of variants and advancements of PSO algorithm. Appl. Sci. 12 (17), 8392 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Jewell, W. T., Ramakumar, R. & Hill, S. R. A study of dispersed photovoltaic generation on the PSO system. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 3 (3), 473–478 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Soepangkat, B. O. P., Norcahyo, R., Effendi, M. K. & Pramujati, B. Multi-response optimization of carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) drilling using back propagation neural network-particle swarm optimization (BPNN-PSO). Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 23 (3), 700–713 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Habeeb, H. H., Abou-El-Hossein, K. A., Mohammad, B. & Kadirgama, K. Effect of tool holder geometry and cutting condition when milling nickel-based alloy 242. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 201 (1–3), 483–485 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ezugwu, E. O., Wang, Z. M. & Machado, A. R. The machinability of nickel-based alloys: a review. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 86 (1–3), 1–16 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wu, Q., Zhou, X. & Pan, X. Cutting tool wear monitoring in milling processes by integrating deep residual convolution network and gated recurrent unit with an attention mechanism. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: J. Eng. Manufact., 237(8), 1171–1181. (2023).

  50. Zhang, F. et al. Data-driven and knowledge-guided prediction model of milling tool life grade. Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 37 (6), 669–684 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Özlü, B., Demir, H. & Nas, E. CNC Tornalama işleminde yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve Kesme Kuvvetlerine Etki Eden parametrelerin matematiksel Olarak modellenmesi. İleri Teknoloji Bilimleri Dergisi. 3 (2), 75–86 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Özlü, B. & Akgün, M. Evaluation of the machinability performance of PH 13 – 8 mo Maraging steel used in the aerospace industry. Proc. Institution Mech. Eng. Part. E: J. Process. Mech. Eng. 238 (2), 687–699 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Nas, E. & Özlü, B. Experimental and Statistical Investigation of the Effect of Input Parameters on Output Parameters in Laser Cutting of Stainless Steel Material (Ironmaking & Steelmaking, 2025).

  54. Yıldırım, Ç. V., Sarıkaya, M., Kıvak, T. & Şirin, Ş. The effect of addition of hBN nanoparticles to nanofluid-MQL on tool wear patterns, tool life, roughness and temperature in turning of Ni-based inconel 625. Tribol. Int. 134, 443–456 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Networks and Cybersecurity, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan

    Mosleh M. Abualhaj

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vardhaman College of Engineering, Hyderabad, India

    B. Venkatesh

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Gokul Global University, Siddhpur, Gujarat, India

    Kiran D. Parmar

  4. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sharda School of Engineering & Sciences, Sharda University, Greater, Noida, India

    Akanksha Mishra

  5. Department of Mechanical Engineering, School of Engineering and Technology, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, India

    D. T. Arunkumar

  6. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India

    Ripendeep Singh

  7. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Siksha ’O’ Anusandhan (Deemed to be University), Bhubaneswar, 751030, Odisha, India

    Abinash Mahapatro

  8. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

    V. K. Bupesh Raja

  9. Department of Additive Manufacturing, Mechanical Engineering, SIMATS, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, 602105, Chennai, India

    Abhijit Bhowmik

  10. Centre for Research Impact & Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura-140401, Punjab, India

    Abhijit Bhowmik

  11. Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Jimma Institute of Technology, Jimma University, Jimma, 378, Ethiopia

    Yalew Tamene

Authors
  1. Mosleh M. Abualhaj
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Venkatesh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kiran D. Parmar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akanksha Mishra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. D. T. Arunkumar
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ripendeep Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Abinash Mahapatro
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. V. K. Bupesh Raja
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Abhijit Bhowmik
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Yalew Tamene
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

M. M. Abualhaj and K. D. Parmar wrote the main manuscript text. B. Venkatesh, Akanksha Mishra, and Abinash Mahapatro contributed to data collection and analysis. Arunkumar D. T., Ripendeep Singh, and V. K. Bupesh Raja prepared figures and assisted with manuscript editing. Abhijit Bhowmik provided supervision and critical revisions. Yalew Tamene conceived the study, coordinated the project, and finalized the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yalew Tamene.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors have given their consent for the publication of this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abualhaj, M.M., Venkatesh, B., Parmar, K.D. et al. Data-driven optimization of machining parameters for Hastelloy C276 using PSO and TLBO frameworks. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36275-x

Download citation

  • Received: 08 November 2025

  • Accepted: 12 January 2026

  • Published: 15 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36275-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Hastelloy C276
  • MQL
  • Cryogenic CO₂
  • Machining responses
  • PSO
  • TLBO
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics