Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prediction of the displacements of the pile tops and ground surface around piles based on machine learning algorithms
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 23 January 2026

Prediction of the displacements of the pile tops and ground surface around piles based on machine learning algorithms

  • Penglin Li1,
  • Shaolong Guo2,
  • Manman Liang2 &
  • …
  • Qun Lu2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 362 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Civil engineering
  • Computer science

Abstract

The soil squeezing effect of pile groups may cause displacements and deformation at the pile tops and ground surface around piles. In severe cases, it can cause problems such as broken piles, cracking of adjacent buildings or cracking of pipes. Artificial intelligence provides a new way to predict horizontal displacements of the pile tops and ground surface around piles caused by soil squeezing effect. The adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) algorithm was applied to the back propagation (BP) neural network model to form the Adaboost-BP model, which improved the learning ability of the BP neural network. For small sample datasets, the prediction accuracy of AdaBoost-BP model, Random Forest (RF) model and Deep Neural Networks (DNN) model is higher than that of BP model. For large sample datasets, the prediction accuracy of various models has improved, but the BP model is lower than that of other models. Analysis shows that the horizontal distance and angle between the center of the bearing platform and the center of the pile tops (or ground surface monitoring points) are the two most important influencing factors. The resting time is also an important influencing factor. Moisture content, relative density, and internal friction angle have a more significant influence on the horizontal displacements of the pile tops and ground surface around piles than other soil property indexes. Quantile regression analysis shows that the horizontal displacements is negatively correlated with the horizontal distance, and positively correlated with the rest time and moisture content. The prediction accuracy of machine learning algorithms (such as DNN) is higher than that of the cylindrical hole expansion method.

Similar content being viewed by others

A case study on the bearing characteristics of a bottom uplift pile in a layered foundation

Article Open access 28 December 2022

Sensitivity analysis of counterweight double-row pile deformation to weak stratum parameters

Article Open access 23 November 2023

Comparative performance evaluation of machine learning models for predicting the ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on granular soils

Article Open access 21 October 2025

Data availability

The sequence data supporting the results of this study can be obtained from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Tan, N. & Bengt, H. F. Bidirectional static loading tests on barrette piles. A case history from Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 61(5), 872–884 (2024).

  2. Pang, L., Jiang, C., Zeng, F. & Zhang, C. Cyclic response of long flexible piles in sands incorporating the cavity expansion/contraction theory. Ocean Eng. 310, 13 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellet, M., Keumo, T. J. & Zhang, Y. The inherent strain method for simulation of additive manufacturing–A critical assessment based on a new variant of the method. Int. J. Numer. Meth. Eng. 125(2), 7378 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, S. L. & Abousleiman, Y. N. A graphical analysis-based method for undrained cylindrical cavity expansion in modified cam clay soil. Geotech.: Int. J. Soil Mech. 73(8), 736–746 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, Z. & Shi, J. Theoretical solutions of soil-squeezing effect due to pile jacking considering geometrical characteristics of a pile. J. Geotech. Eng. 32(6), 956–962 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liu, Y. H., Chen, Z. Z., Peng, Z. J., Gao, Y. S. & Gao, P. Analysis of pile driving effect of precast tubular pile using cylindrical cavity expansion theory. Rock and Soil Mechanics 28(10), 2167–2172 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hight, D. W. & Bishop, A. W. The value of poisson’s ratio in saturated soils and rocks stressed under undrained conditions. Géotechnique 27(3), 369–384 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lu, Q., Gong, X. N., Cui, W. W., Zhang, K. P. & Xu, M. H. Finite element analysis of compacting displacements of single jacked pile. Rock & Soil Mech. 28(11), 2426–2430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-006-0011-3 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Luo, Z., Tao, Y., Gong, X. & Zou, B. Soil compacting displacements for two jacked piles considering shielding effects. Acta Geotech. 15(8), 2367–2377 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shao, Y., Wang, S. & Guan, Y. Numerical simulation of soil squeezing effects of a jacked pipe pile in soft foundation soil and in foundation soil with an underlying gravel layer. Geotech. Geological Eng. 34(2), 493–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-015-9960-y (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhou, H. & Shi, J. Test research on soil compacting effect of full scale jacked-in pile in saturated soft clay. Rock Soil Mech. 30(11), 3291–3296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1874-8651(10)60073-7 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, S. & Zhang, X. Study on influencing factors of soil compaction effect of pipe pile in soft soil area. Front. Earth Sci. 12, 1495866 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan, B. X., Li, Z., Zhao, Z., Ni, H. & Li, Z. Experimental study of displacement field of layered soils surrounding laterally loaded pile based on transparent soil. J. Soils Sediments 4, 1–12 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yuan, B. X., Chen, R. R., Teng, J., Peng, T. & Feng, Z. W. Effect of passive pile on 3d ground deformation and on active pile response. Sci. World J. 2014, 1–6 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mustafa, R. & Ahmad, M. T. Reliability analysis of pile foundation in cohesionless soil using machine learning techniques. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology 11(4), 2671–2699 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Haddad, L. A., Fattah, M. Y., Al-Soudani, W. H. S., Al-Haddad, S. A. & Jaber, A. A. Enhanced load-settlement curve forecasts for open-ended pipe piles incorporating soil plug constraints using shallow and deep neural net-works. China Ocean Eng. 2025(3), 562–572 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tran, T. H., Nguyen, B. P. & Tran, T. D. Machine learning applications in pile load capacity prediction: advanced analysis of pile driving forces and depths in urban ho chi minh city construction sites. Indian Geotech. J. 55(3), 1795–1800 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ren, J. & Sun, X. Prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of pile foundation based on two optimization algorithm models. Buildings 13(5), 2075–5309 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Honarjoo, A. & Ghiasi, V. Analyzing analytical and software methods for deep foundation analysis and presenting a new solution for determining pile capacity using the pda test. Int. J. Geo-Eng. 16, 14 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kordjazi, A., Nejad, F. P. & Jaksa, M. B. Prediction of ultimate axial load-carrying capacity of piles using a support vector machine based on CPT data. Comput. Geotech. 55, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.001 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shahin, M. A. Load–settlement modeling of axially loaded steel driven piles using CPT-based recurrent neural networks. Soils Found. 54(3), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2014.04.015 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moayedi, H. & Hayati, S. Applicability of a cpt-based neural network solution in predicting load-settlement responses of bored pile. Int. J. Geomech. 18(6), 1943–1954 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tan, N., Duy-Khuong, L., Jim, S. & Phi, N. D. Optimizing load-displacement prediction for bored piles with the 3mSOS algorithm and neural networks. Ocean Eng. 304, 117758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117758 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tan, N., Duy-Khuong, L., Thien, Q. H. & Thanh, T. N. Soft computing for determining base resistance of super-long piles in soft soil A coupled SPBO-XGBoost approach. Comput. Geotech. 162, 105707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105707 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tram, B. N., Duy-Khuong, L., Tan, N. & Nguyen-Thoi, T. Sustainable foundation design, Hybrid TLBO-XGB model with confidence interval enhanced load–displacement prediction for PGPN piles. Adv. Eng. Inform. 65, 103288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2025.103288 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tram, B. N., Tan, N., Minh-The, N. Q. & Jim, S. Predicting load–displacement of driven PHC pipe piles using stacking ensemble with Pareto optimization. Eng. Struct. 316, 118574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118574 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yuan, B. X. et al. Study on the interaction between pile and soil under lateral load in coral sand. Geomech. Energy Environ. 42, 100674 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tiwari, M. K. & Chatterjee, C. Uncertainty assessment and en-semble flood forecasting using Boostrap based Artificial Neurial Networks. J. Hydrol. 382, 20–33 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Guo, S. L., Zheng, D. J., Zhao, L. H. & Liu, X. K. ANN-AdaBoost model for the strength-weakening coefficient of soft clay in port engineering. Sadhana, Academy Proceed. Eng. Sci. 48(4), 234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-023-02276-z (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lin, E., Lin, C. & Lane, H. Y. Prediction of functional outcomes of schizophrenia with genetic biomarkers using a bagging ensemble machine learning method with feature selection. Sci. Rep. 11, 10179 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Huang, G., Liu, Z., Maaten, L. V. D. & Weinberger, K. Q. Densely connected convolutional networks. IEEE Comput. Soc. 7, 4700–4708. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, C., Lv, W. C., Guo, Z. C., Liu, Y. & Xie, S. C. An optimized combined prediction model for surface subsidence based on GA-KF and BP-Adaboost. J. Geodesy Geodynamics 43(2), 203–208 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. He, Q. P., Si, Y. B. & Li S. Y. Settlement prediction of high-speed railway subgrade based on MIDBO-BP-Adaboost. Journal of beijing jiaotong university 49(3) (2025).

  34. Wang, Z. Parameter optimization and state evaluation of basketball teaching based on BPNN. Mobile Inform. Syst. 2022, 1. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4327356 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Deng, J., Gu, D., Li, X. & Zhong, Q. Structural reliability analysis for implicit performance functions using artificial neural network. Struct. Saf. 27(1), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2004.03.004 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Murmu, S. et al. Identification of potent phytochemicals against magnaporthe oryzae through machine learning aided-virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulation approach. Comput. Biol. Med. 188, 109862 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen, X., Ding, H., Fang, S. & Chen, W. Predicting the success of internet social welfare crowdfunding based on text information. Appl. Sci. 12(3), 1572. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031572 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Khandel, O. & Soliman, M. Integrated framework for assessment of time-variant flood fragility of bridges using deep learning neural networks. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 27(1), 1943–1955. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000587 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mohammad, A. et al. Hybrid deep neural network optimization with particle swarm and grey wolf algorithms for sunburst attack detection. Computers 14(3), 107–107. https://doi.org/10.3390/COMPUTERS14030107 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Li, J., Zhang, Y., Chen, H. & Liang, F. Analytical solutions of spherical cavity expansion near a slope due to pile installation. J. Appl. Math. 2013(4), 1–11 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Major Science and Technology Research and Development Project of China Harbour Engineering Co., Ltd. in 2023 (METRO1-CS-E-230407), and Tianjin Technology Innovation Guidance Special Fund (23YDTPJC00110).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Harbor Engineering Co., LTD., Beijing, 100027, China

    Penglin Li

  2. Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin, 300384, China

    Shaolong Guo, Manman Liang & Qun Lu

Authors
  1. Penglin Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shaolong Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manman Liang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qun Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

(Corresponding Author)Shaolong Guo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Investigation, Formal Analysis, Writing Original Draft; Penglin Li: Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft; Manman Liang: Visualization, Investigation, Software, Validation; Qun Lu: Visualization, Writing—Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaolong Guo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, P., Guo, S., Liang, M. et al. Prediction of the displacements of the pile tops and ground surface around piles based on machine learning algorithms. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36502-5

Download citation

  • Received: 14 May 2025

  • Accepted: 13 January 2026

  • Published: 23 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36502-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Squeezing effects
  • Jacked piles
  • Field measurement
  • AdaBoost-BP Algorithms
  • DNN Algorithms
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing AI and Robotics

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics newsletter — what matters in AI and robotics research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: AI and Robotics