Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Machine learning-based evaluation of shear strength factors in soil-rock mixtures for mountain substation fills
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 19 January 2026

Machine learning-based evaluation of shear strength factors in soil-rock mixtures for mountain substation fills

  • Xionghui Huang1 na1,
  • Jin Liao5 na1,
  • Hong Ke2,
  • Qing Peng1,
  • Zhuo Ma2,
  • Jianmin Chen1,
  • Zhen Liu4,5 &
  • …
  • Cuiying Zhou3,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 397 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Structural materials

Abstract

Soil-rock mixtures (SRMs) are crucial in assessing foundation bearing capacity and slope stability in mountain substation projects, yet their complex mechanical properties pose significant challenges. Current research primarily focuses on the influence of individual factors on shear strength using the controlled variable method, offering limited insight into the interactions and quantitative analysis of multiple influencing factors. This limitation hinders accurate prediction and effective control of shear strength, complicating post-construction settlement management. To address this challenge, this study introduces an analysis method employing a feedforward neural network (FNN) to evaluate changes in SRM shear strength under the influence of multiple factors. By integrating SRM physical properties with shear strength test data, the method facilitates identification and quantitative analysis of key factors, including moisture content, dry density, void ratio, and the liquid-plastic limits of fillers with varying particle gradations. A correlation model is developed, demonstrating high reliability and predictive accuracy. Among the analyzed factors, moisture content and plastic limit exhibit the most significant influence on SRM shear strength, with importance levels ranging from 23.9% to 32.8%. The primary contribution of this research is the integration of machine learning with traditional geotechnical analysis, offering a practical framework for the identification and evaluation of factors influencing SRM shear strength. The proposed correlation model provides valuable insights into the intrinsic factors governing SRM shear strength variability and offers practical guidance for the design, construction, and operational safety of fill engineering in substations across southwestern China. Moreover, it serves as a useful reference for the quantitative analysis of influencing factors in SRMs for other regions.

Similar content being viewed by others

Estimation of the Shear Strength of Sand-Clay mixtures based on the ANN and low-field NMR

Article Open access 02 January 2025

Predicting soil compaction parameters in expansive soils using advanced machine learning models: a comparative study

Article Open access 05 July 2025

Comparison of machine learning models for rock UCS prediction using measurement while drilling data

Article Open access 11 March 2025

Data availability

Data will be available from the corresponding author as needed.

References

  1. Hou, X. K., Qi, S. W., Yu, Y. T. & Zheng, J. G. Long-term settlement characterization of high-filling foundation in the mountain excavation and city construction area of the Yan’an New District. China. Journal of Earth Science 34, 1908–1915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-023-1950-x (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, X. et al. Remote Sensing Characterization of Mountain Excavation and City Construction in Loess Plateau. Geophys. Res. Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021gl095230 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saadeghvaziri, M. A., Feizi, B., Kempner, L. & Alston, D. On seismic response of substation equipment and application of base isolation to transformers. IEEE Trans. Power Delivery 25, 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2009.2033971 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li, G. Y. et al. Freeze-thaw properties and long-term thermal stability of the unprotected tower foundation soils in permafrost regions along the Qinghai-Tibet Power Transmission Line. Cold Reg. Sci. Technol. 121, 258–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2015.05.004 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xu, P., Zhu, X., Qiao, S. F., Wang, G. & Yu, P. K. Field study of compaction quality control parameters and compaction mechanism of large particle size stone-filled embankment. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 55, 3687–3702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-022-02811-0 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, F. Y. et al. fractal analysis on the crushing characteristics of soil-soft rock mixtures under compaction. Fractal and Fractional https://doi.org/10.3390/fractalfract8020090 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feng, D., Chen, D. & Liang, S. A macro-micro coupled theoretical model by considering the rotation displacement of rock blocks for predicting the shear strength of soil-rock mixture. Constr. Build. Mater. 449, 138336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138336 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Qiu, P. Y. et al. Experimental investigations on the shear strength and creep properties of soil-rock mixture under freeze-thaw cycles. Cold Regions Sci. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2023.104037 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wei, H. Z., Xu, W. J., Wei, C. F. & Meng, Q. S. Influence of water content and shear rate on the mechanical behavior of soil-rock mixtures. Science China-Technological Sciences 61, 1127–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-017-9277-5 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, F. Y., Gao, C. B., Xu, J. M. & Yang, J. Cyclic shear behavior and BoBiLSTM-based model for soil-rock mixture-concrete interfaces. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136031 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, Z. P. et al. An approach to predicting the shear strength of soil-rock mixture based on rock block proportion. Bull. Eng. Geol. Env. 79, 2423–2437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-019-01658-0 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S., Zhou, R., Yang, F., Zhang, Y. & Du, Y. Effect of particle combination ratio of soil rock mixture on shear strength. Journal of physics: conference series. 2202, 012019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2202/1/012019 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, G., Wang, K. & Xia, Z. T. Experimental study on shear properties and resistivity change of soil-rock mixture. J. Mt. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-024-8911-6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, Y., Lu, J. Y., Han, W., Xiong, Y. W. & Qian, J. S. Effects of moisture and stone content on the shear strength characteristics of soil-rock mixture. Materials https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16020567 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Qian, J. F., Yao, Y. S., Li, J., Xiao, H. B. & Luo, S. P. Resilient properties of soil-rock mixture materials: preliminary investigation of the effect of composition and structure. Materials https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13071658 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tu, Y. L. et al. Comparative analysis on shear mechanical properties of soil- rock mixture under direct shear and simple shear tests. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137830 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yang, Z. P., Li, S. Q., Jiang, Y. W., Hu, Y. X. & Liu, X. R. Shear Mechanical Properties of the Interphase between Soil-Rock Mixtures and Benched Bedrock Slope Surfaces. Int. J.Geomechanics https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0002342 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wen-Jie, X., Qiang, X. & Rui-Lin, H. Study on the shear strength of soil–rock mixture by large scale direct shear test. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 48, 1235–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.09.018 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, L., Yang, Y., Mao, X. & Nie, M. Macro-meso shear properties of alluvial-diluvial soil-rock mixture (ADSRM) subgrade fillers based on field investigation and N-method. Case Studies in Construction Materials 17, e01694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01694 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhong, W. et al. Development of a preparation method of transparent soil-rock mixture for geotechnical laboratory modeling. Eng. Geol. 301, 106622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106622 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Li, S. et al. Influencing factors of scale effects in large-scale direct shear tests of soil-rock mixtures based on particle breakage. Transportation Geotechnics 31, 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100677 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu, Z. et al. Effects of rock content and spatial distribution on the stability of soil rock mixture embankments. Sci. Rep. 14, 29088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-80812-5 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Yao, Y., Li, J., Ni, J., Liang, C. & Zhang, A. Effects of gravel content and shape on shear behaviour of soil-rock mixture: Experiment and DEM modelling. Comput. Geotech. 141, 104476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104476 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, X. et al. Fractal analysis of particle distribution and scale effect in a soil-rock mixture. Fractal and Fractional 6, 120 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhao, N., Wang, Y. C., Meng, B. & Luo, N. Numerical Simulation on the Seepage Properties of Soil-Rock Mixture. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1859319 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Hu, Y. & Liu, X. Shear Mechanical Properties of the Interphase between Soil-Rock Mixtures and Benched Bedrock Slope Surfaces. Int. J. Geomech. 22, 04022047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002342 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ding, Y., Lu, Q., Lu, F. & Li, J. Study on the determination mechanism of the compression wave velocity of soil-rock mixture considering the effect of soil-rock interface. Comput. Geotech. 156, 105300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105300 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sahoo, A. K. & Chakraverty, S. Machine intelligence in dynamical systems: \A state-of-art review. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1461 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Azadeh, A., Moghaddam, M., Khakzad, M. & Ebrahimipour, V. A flexible neural network-fuzzy mathematical programming algorithm for improvement of oil price estimation and forecasting. Comput. Ind. Eng. 62, 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2011.06.019 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, W., Gu, X., Hong, L., Han, L. & Wang, L. Comprehensive review of machine learning in geotechnical reliability analysis: Algorithms, applications and further challenges. Appl. Soft Comput. 136, 110066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110066 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P. & Karniadakis, G. E. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Olden, J. D. & Jackson, D. A. Illuminating the “black box”: a randomization approach for understanding variable contributions in artificial neural networks. Ecol. Model. 154, 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00064-9 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gevrey, M., Dimopoulos, I. & Lek, S. Review and comparison of methods to study the contribution of variables in artificial neural network models. Ecol. Model. 160, 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3800(02)00257-0 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kalman, H. & Portnikov, D. Analyzing bulk density and void fraction: B. Effect of moisture content and compression pressure. Powder Technol. 381, 285–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2020.12.019 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Benachour, Y., Davy, C. A., Skoczylas, F. & Houari, H. Effect of a high calcite filler addition upon micro structural, mechanical, shrinkage and transport properties of a mortar. Cem. Concr. Res. 38, 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.02.007 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qiu, J. P., Guo, Z. B., Yang, L., Jiang, H. Q. & Zhao, Y. L. Effects of packing density and water film thickness on the fluidity behaviour of cemented paste backfill. Powder Technol. 359, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.10.046 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wu, C. L., Chau, K. W. & Li, Y. S. Methods to improve neural network performance in daily flows prediction. J. Hydrol. 372, 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.038 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kankal, M. & Uzlu, E. Neural network approach with teaching-learning-based optimization for modeling and forecasting long-term electric energy demand in Turkey. Neural Comput. Appl. 28, S737–S747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-016-2409-2 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Liao, J. et al. Intelligent analysis method for the global vertical displacement field of foundation pits in dense karst cave areas. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.109178 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Zeng, Q. H. et al. The sensitivity and timeliness of a variation correlation between structures in close proximity and located in the delta region. Measurement https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113953 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vanapalli, S. K., Fredlund, D. G., Pufahl, D. E. & Clifton, A. W. Model for the prediction of shear strength with respect to soil suction. Can. Geotech. J. 33, 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1139/t96-060 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Stavridakis, E. I. Evaluation of Engineering and Cement-Stabilization Parameters of Clayey-Sand Mixtures under Soaked Conditions. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 23, 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-004-0800-8 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Karakan, E. & Demir, S. Effect of fines content and plasticity on undrained shear strength of quartz-clay mixtures. Arabian J.Geosci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-4114-1 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Vallejo, L. E. & Mawby, R. Porosity influence on the shear strength of granular material–clay mixtures. Eng. Geol. 58, 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0013-7952(00)00051-x (2000).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work presented in this article was supported by Science and Technology Innovation Project of China Southern Power Grid Co., Ltd. (Grant No. CGYKJXM20220236) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant No. 42277131, 42293354, 42293351, 42293355, 42293350).

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally : Xionghui Huang and Jin Liao.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. China Southern Power Grid Ehv Power Transmission Company, Guangzhou, 510275, China

    Xionghui Huang, Qing Peng & Jianmin Chen

  2. China Energy Engineering Group Yunnan Electric Power Design Institute Co.,Ltd., Yunnan, 650051, China

    Hong Ke & Zhuo Ma

  3. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Cuiying Zhou

  4. Institute of Disaster Prevention and Reduction of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, 510006, China

    Zhen Liu & Cuiying Zhou

  5. Guangdong Engineering Research Centre for Major Infrastructure Safety, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510275, China

    Jin Liao & Zhen Liu

Authors
  1. Xionghui Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jin Liao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Ke
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Qing Peng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Zhuo Ma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Jianmin Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Zhen Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Cuiying Zhou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Xionghui Huang: Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Jin Liao: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Hong ke: Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing. Qing Peng: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Zhuo Ma: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Jianmin Chen: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Methodology, Writing – review & editing. Zhen Liu: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing. Cuiying Zhou: Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Liu or Cuiying Zhou.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, X., Liao, J., Ke, H. et al. Machine learning-based evaluation of shear strength factors in soil-rock mixtures for mountain substation fills. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36601-3

Download citation

  • Received: 17 February 2025

  • Accepted: 14 January 2026

  • Published: 19 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36601-3

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Mountain substation
  • Machine learning
  • Soil-rock mixture
  • Shear strength
  • Influencing factors
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing