Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Weight optimization of MIMO-UWB distributed beamforming for implant communications
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 21 January 2026

Weight optimization of MIMO-UWB distributed beamforming for implant communications

  • Takumi Kobayashi1,
  • Jaakko Hyry1,
  • Manato Fujimoto1 &
  • …
  • Daisuke Anzai1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 408 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Medical research

Abstract

This paper discussed a frequency-dependent distributed beamforming technique to improve the reliability in implant multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)-ultra wideband (UWB) communications. To realize distributed beamforming for implant MIMO-UWB systems, we propose an optimization method to theoretically determine the weight coefficients optimized for the implant UWB communication. To evaluate the performance improvement, the propagation characteristics of the implant channel in the low band UWB (3.4–4.8 GHz) were analyzed by the finite difference time domain (FDTD) method with a numerical human model. Subsequently, this study conducted computer simulations based on the derived propagation channel model. The evaluation results demonstrate that the proposed beamforming effectively improved the \(E_b/N_0\) performance by 5 dB in a capsule endoscopy scenario, compared to the conventional method, which can improve implantable medical devices in the future.

Similar content being viewed by others

A compact circularly polarized dielectric resonator antenna with MIMO characterizations for UWB applications

Article Open access 30 September 2024

A common grounded ultra-wideband diversity/MIMO antenna with high inter-element isolation

Article Open access 27 July 2025

A low profile super UWB- MIMO antenna with d-shaped for satellite communications, 5G and beyond applications

Article Open access 05 May 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to Patent restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Li, H. B. & Kohno, R. Body Area Network and Its Standardization at IEEE 802.15.6 BAN (2008).

  2. Wang, J. & Wang, Q. Body Area Communication (Wiley–IEEE, 2013).

  3. Jhunjhunwala, V. K. et al. Flexible UWB and MIMO antennas for wireless body area network: A review. Sensors https://doi.org/10.3390/s22239549 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Xiao, C., Liang, Z. & Yang, J. Radiation characteristic analysis of antenna deeply implanted in human body and localization sensor array. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 71, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2022.3141723 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yuce, M. R. & Dissanayake, T. Easy-to-swallow wireless telemetry. IEEE Microw. Mag. 13, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2012.2205832 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Yuce, M. R., Dissanayake, T. & Keong, H. C. Wireless telemetry for electronic pill technology. IEEE Sens. J. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2009.2032193 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jung, J., Shin, S., Li, M. & Kim, Y. T. telemetry transmission to support bidirectional communication for capsule endoscope using human body communication. IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett. 31, 905–908. https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWC.2021.3078089 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jung, J., Li, M. & Kim, Y. T. Study on 13.56-MHz out-to-in body channel and its coexistence with human body communication for capsule endoscope. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 63, 2819–2825. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.32915 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Current Situation of Spectrum Use in Japan. https://www.tele.soumu.go.jp/e/adm/freq/search/myuse/0002/index.htm (2025).

  10. Ando, H. et al. Wireless multichannel neural recording with a 128-Mbps UWB transmitter for an implantable brain–machine interfaces. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Circuits Syst. 10, 1068–1078. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2016.2514522 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cheraghinia, M. et al. A comprehensive overview on UWB radar: Applications, standards, signal processing techniques, datasets, radio chips, trends and future research directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 27, 2283–2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2024.3488173 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Anzai, D. et al. Experimental evaluation of implant UWB-IR transmission with living animal for body area network. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 62, 183–192. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2013.2292799 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nagaraj, S. & Rassam, F. G. Improved noncoherent UWB receiver for implantable biomedical devices. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 63, 2220–2225. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2015.2511538 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shi, J., Anzai, D. & Wang, J. Channel modeling and performance analysis of diversity reception for implant UWB wireless link. IEICE Trans. Commun. E95–B, 3197–3205. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E95.B.3197 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Takizawa, K., Aoyagi, T., Hamaguchi, K. & Kohno, R. Performance evaluation of wireless communications through capsule endoscope. In Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. (EMBC), 6897–6900, https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5334484 (2009).

  16. Floor, P. A. et al. In-body to on-body ultrawideband propagation model derived from measurements in living animals. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 19, 938–948. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2015.2417805 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Särestöniemi, M., Pomalaza-Raez, C. & Iinatti, J. Radio channel study for colon capsule endoscopy with low-band UWB multiple antenna system. In 2022 IEEE 16th International Symposium on Medical Information and Communication Technology (ISMICT), 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMICT56646.2022.9828189 (2022).

  18. Shimizu, Y. et al. Performance evaluation of an ultra-wideband transmit diversity in a living animal experiment. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 65, 2596–2606. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2017.2652463 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shimizu, Y., Furukawa, T., Anzai, D. & Wang, J. Performance improvement by transmit diversity technique for implant ultra-wideband communication. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 10, 1106–1112. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2015.0663 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Li, R. & Guo, Y. A conformal UWB dual-polarized antenna for wireless capsule endoscope systems. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 20, 483–487. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2021.3054825 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shang, J. & Yu, Y. An ultrawideband capsule antenna for biomedical applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 18, 2548–2551. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2019.2936664 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Prasad, R., Dixit, S., Nee, R. V. & Ojanpera, T. Globalization of Mobile and Wireless Communications: Today and in 2020 (Springer, 2011).

  23. Barbarossa, S. & Scutari, G. Distributed space-time coding strategies for wideband multihop networks: regenerative vs. non-regenerative relays. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech, Signal Process. (ICASSP), 501–504, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2004.1326347 (2004).

  24. Jayaprakasam, S., Rahim, S. K. A. & Leow, C. Y. Distributed and collaborative beamforming in wireless sensor networks: Classifications, trends, and research directions. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 19, 2092–2116. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2728102 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Xu, X. et al. Power-efficient distributed beamforming for full-duplex MIMO relaying networks. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 66, 1087–1103. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2016.2580519 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Prananta, N., Hara, S. & Hara, Y. Go green with distributed beamforming. In Wireless Pers. Multimedia Commun. (WPMC), 1–5 (2011).

  27. Kisseleff, S., Akyildiz, I. F. & Gerstacker, W. Distributed beamforming for magnetic induction based body area sensor network. In Proc. IEEE Glob. Commun. Conf. (GLOBECOM), 1–7, https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2016.7842165 (2016).

  28. Muralidharan, A. & Mostofi, Y. Energy optimal distributed beamforming using unmanned vehicles. IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst. 5, 1529–1540. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2017.2748064 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, R. & Brown, D. R. Optimal wireless power transfer with distributed transmit beamforming. IEEE J. Commun. Netw. 19, 134–146 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ding, Y., Fusco, V. & Zhang, J. Phase error effects on distributed transmit beamforming for wireless communications. In Eur. Conf. Antennas Propag. (EuCAP), 3100–3103, https://doi.org/10.23919/EuCAP.2017.7928706 (2017).

  31. Nanzer, J. A., Mghabghab, S. R., Ellison, S. M. & Schlegel, A. Distributed phased arrays: Challenges and recent advances. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 69, 4893–4907. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2021.3092401 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shah, S. M. A. et al. Miniaturized four-port MIMO implantable antenna for high-data-rate wireless-capsule-endoscopy applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 71, 3123–3133. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAP.2023.3243984 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li, Y. & Feng, Q. Ultrawideband conformal MIMO antenna with ferrite-based modified inverted-f structure for wireless capsule endoscopy applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 24, 2854–2858. https://doi.org/10.1109/LAWP.2025.3575376 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Krishnan, S. & Hafez, M. A. On the importance of accurate utilization of pathloss model for real-time uwb-based wireless capsule endoscopy localization and communication in individual. In In 2024 Int. Conf. Commun. Signal Process (ICCSP), 553–558, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSP60870.2024.10544068 (2024).

  35. Taricco, G. Information rate optimization for the non-regenerative linear MIMO relay channel with a direct link and variable duty cycle. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 68, 5889–5900. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIT.2022.3166073 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Luo, J., Zhao, S., Yang, Z., Huang, G. & Tang, D. Data-driven-based relay selection and cooperative beamforming for non-regenerative multi-antenna relay networks. IEEE Access 9, 167154–167161. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3136332 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kavitha, K. & Sivakumar, T. A comprehensive survey on beamforming and antenna selection in MIMO systems using deep learning and machine learning techniques with future research directions. In 2024 2nd World Conference on Communication & Computing (WCONF), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1109/WCONF61366.2024.10692227 (2024).

  38. Tse, D. & Viswanath, P. Fundamentals of Wireless Communication (Cambridge University Press, 2005).

  39. Haykin, S. Adaptive Filter Theory, Third Edition (Prentice-Hall, 1996).

  40. Li, Y. G., Winters, J. H. & Sollenberger, N. R. MIMO-OFDM for wireless communications: Signal detection with enhanced channel estimation. IEEE Trans. Commun. 50, 1471–1477 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nagaoka, T. et al. Development of realistic high-resolution whole-body voxel models of Japanese adult males and females of average height and weight, and application of models to radio-frequency electromagnetic-field dosimetry. Phys. Med. Biol. 49, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/49/1/001 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Goldsmith, A. Wireless Communications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Anzai, D., Koya, T. & Wang, J. Throughput evaluation on multilevel modulation with local frequency offset spatial diversity for 400 MHz band implant communications. IET Microw. Antennas Propag. 11, 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-map.2016.0604 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Mr. Takuma Suzaki for his contribution to the communication performance evaluation.

Funding

This research was supported in part by JST Moonshot R&D Grant Number JPMJMS2214-06, the JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 24K00885 and MIC/FORWARD Grant Number JPMI250830001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Informatics, Osaka Metropolitan University, Sakai, 599–8531, Japan

    Takumi Kobayashi, Jaakko Hyry, Manato Fujimoto & Daisuke Anzai

Authors
  1. Takumi Kobayashi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jaakko Hyry
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Manato Fujimoto
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Daisuke Anzai
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.K., J.H., M.F. and D.A. conceived the experiments, J.H. M.F. and T.K. conducted the simulations, and analysed the communication performance results. D.A. provided the project funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the writing and review of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daisuke Anzai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kobayashi, T., Hyry, J., Fujimoto, M. et al. Weight optimization of MIMO-UWB distributed beamforming for implant communications. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36694-w

Download citation

  • Received: 19 September 2025

  • Accepted: 14 January 2026

  • Published: 21 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36694-w

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing