Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Biological welding enables rapid and efficient bladder cystotomy closure and reveals the underlying repair mechanism
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 06 February 2026

Biological welding enables rapid and efficient bladder cystotomy closure and reveals the underlying repair mechanism

  • Fanchun Zeng1,2,3 na1,
  • Yuan Chen1 na1,
  • Minggan Guo1,
  • Fengwen Fu3,
  • Quanfu Cao3,4 &
  • …
  • Zhongyi Sun1,2,3,4 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 600 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Medical research
  • Urology

Abstract

Bladder rupture repair surgery is limited by its long duration, significant blood loss, and complex procedures. Biological welding technology, which integrates multiple functions such as cutting, hemostasis, and tissue fusion, has shown potential in the field of soft tissue repair surgery but has not yet been widely explored in clinical applications for bladder rupture repair. This study used 32 adult male Beagle dogs to establish a bladder rupture model, randomly assigned to the biological welding group or the traditional suturing group. Outcomes assessed included surgical time, blood loss, postoperative inflammation, and hematuria. Histopathological analysis and RNA sequencing analysis were performed at multiple postoperative time points to evaluate the tissue recovery process and repair mechanisms. The results demonstrated that biological welding significantly reduced surgical time (21.80 ± 4.79 min vs. 75.15 ± 13.26 min, p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (6.37 ± 0.89 g vs. 30.36 ± 6.59 g, p < 0.001) compared to traditional suturing. Postoperative complications, such as hematuria and inflammatory response, were notably lower in the biological welding group. Histopathological analysis revealed enhanced cell migration and tissue fusion in the biological welding group, leading to accelerated bladder healing and reduced adhesions. Transcriptomic sequencing indicated that biological welding activated a limited number of immune-related genes and signaling pathways in the early postoperative period, facilitating rapid repair and a shorter duration of abnormal gene expression. Our research indicates that biological welding technology demonstrates significant advantages in bladder rupture repair surgery, including enhanced surgical efficiency, reduced incidence of postoperative complications, and accelerated tissue healing process, with broad prospects for clinical application.

Similar content being viewed by others

Low-energy shock wave therapy ameliorates ischemic-induced overactive bladder in a rat model

Article Open access 19 December 2022

Multilayer analysis of ethnically diverse blood and urine biomarkers for breast cancer risk and prognosis

Article Open access 25 February 2025

The sex gap in bladder cancer survival — a missing link in bladder cancer care?

Article 21 August 2023

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the Zenodo repository, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18255296.

References

  1. Morey, A. F., Broghammer, J. A., Hollowell, C. M. P., McKibben, M. J. & Souter, L. Urotrauma guideline 2020: AUA guideline. J. Urol. 205, 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000001408 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy, D., Laher, A. E., Lawrentschuk, N. & Adam, A. Spontaneous (idiopathic) rupture of the urinary bladder: a systematic review of case series and reports. BJU Int. 131, 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15974 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stabile, G. et al. Spontaneous Bladder Rupture after Normal Vaginal Delivery: Description of a Rare Complication and Systematic Review of the Literature. Diagnostics https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11101885 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Da Huang, J., Shao, E. X., Tham, C. M., Chung, E. & Rhee, H. Bladder malignancy as a cause of spontaneous bladder rupture: A systematic review. BJUI Compass. 5, 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.281 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piramide, F. et al. Atlas of intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder techniques after Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and systematic review of clinical outcomes. Eur. Urol. 85, 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.11.017 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Masone, M. C. HRQOL after radical cystectomy. Nat. Rev. Urol. 18, 706. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-021-00540-7 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fu, S. et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of its differential effect on effectiveness and safety. Int. J. Surg. (London England). 110, 2366–2380. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000001065 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, H. P., Luo, N. Q., Zhang, M. & Liu, Y. Laparoscopic repair of extraperitoneal bladder rupture via the extraperitoneal approach: A case report. Asian J. Surg. 47, 4855–4856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.05.162 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Catto, J. W. F. et al. Effect of Robot-Assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion vs open radical cystectomy on 90-Day morbidity and mortality among patients with bladder cancer: A randomized clinical trial. Jama 327, 2092–2103. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.7393 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Katsimperis, S. et al. Complications after radical cystectomy: A systematic review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with a Meta-regression analysis. Eur. Urol. Focus. 9, 920–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2023.05.002 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martini, A. et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with orthotopic neobladder reconstruction: techniques and functional outcomes in males. Eur. Urol. 84, 484–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.04.009 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tuderti, G. et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on oncologic outcomes in patients receiving robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. World J. Urol. 42, 479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05178-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmadi, H. et al. Long-term renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease following radical cystectomy and orthotopic neobladder. BJU Int. 130, 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15685 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Umanets, N., Pasyechnikova, N. V., Naumenko, V. A. & Henrich, P. B. High-frequency electric welding: a novel method for improved immediate chorioretinal adhesion in vitreoretinal surgery.. Graefe’s archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 252, 1697–1703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-014-2709-0 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, H. et al. Temperature Distribution of Vessel Tissue by High Frequency Electric Welding with Combination Optical Measure and Simulation. Biosensors https://doi.org/10.3390/bios12040209 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yin, L. et al. Dynamic Impedance Analysis of Intestinal Anastomosis during High-Frequency Electric Field Welding Process. Sensors https://doi.org/10.3390/s22114101 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zabolotnyi, D. & Kvasha, O. Bipolar high-frequency electric welding in radical resection of frontal sinus tumors. Carcinogenesis 44, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgad018 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tryliskyy, Y. et al. Safety analysis of endoscopic haemostasis using a high-frequency live tissue electric welding device - EKVZ300 PATONMED. Przeglad Gastroenterologiczny. 13, 234–237. https://doi.org/10.5114/pg.2018.78289 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tyselskyi, V., Poylin, V. & Kebkalo, A. Biological welding - novel technique in the treatment of esophageal metaplasia. Polski Przeglad Chirurgiczny. 92, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.1176 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zeng, F., Cao, Q., Fu, F., Wang, B. & Sun, Z. Biological welding: a rapid and bloodless approach to circumcision. World J. Urol. 43, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05355-w (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, C. et al. Characteristics of Collagen Changes in Small Intestine Anastomoses Induced by High-Frequency Electric Field Welding. Biomolecules https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12111683 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Becker, L. et al. Raman microspectroscopy identifies fibrotic tissues in collagen-related disorders via deconvoluted collagen type I spectra. Acta Biomater. 162, 278–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2023.03.016 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kanehisa, M., Furumichi, M., Sato, Y., Kawashima, M. & Ishiguro-Watanabe, M. KEGG for taxonomy-based analysis of pathways and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, D587–d592. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac963 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, C. et al. Assessing the influence of parameters on tissue welding in small bowel end-to-end anastomosis in vitro and in vivo. Surg. Endosc. 38, 3126–3137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10795-x (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davis, L. et al. Female sexual function following radical cystectomy in bladder cancer. Sex. Med. Reviews. 10, 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sxmr.2021.10.005 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, Z., Dou, X., Zhou, W. & Liu, Q. Robot-assisted, laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 50, 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1677-5538.Ibju.2024.0191 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saiz, A. M. Jr. et al. Bladder repair with irrigation and debridement and open reduction internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring is safe and decreases risk of infection in pelvic ring injuries with extraperitoneal bladder ruptures. J. Orthop. Trauma. 38, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002720 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiong, X. et al. Effect of neurovascular bundle sparing radical cystectomy on post-operative continence and sexual function: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Andrology 9, 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.12898 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zhu, C. et al. Vivo tissue healing mechanism at the intestinal anastomosis site following high-frequency electric welding. Int. J. Surg. (London England). 111, 1614–1618. https://doi.org/10.1097/js9.0000000000002093 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Feleshtynskyi, Y. P., Oparin, S. O., Sorokin, B. V., Boiarskaia, M. G. & Lutsenko, D. V. Endoscopic hemostasis in ulcerative gastroduodenal bleeding using high-frequency biological welding electroligation. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960) 74, 2159–2162. (2021).

  31. Savolyuk, S. I., Khodos, V. A., Herashchenko, R. A. & Horbovets, V. S. Comparative evaluation of the results of surgical treatment of acute ascending thrombophlebitis of the great saphenous vein using the endovascular high-frequency welding technique and traditional technique. Wiadomosci lekarskie (Warsaw, Poland: 1960) 73, 638–641. (2020).

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the International Cooperation in Science and Technology of The Science and Technology Ministry (2014DFR30860), Shenzhen Science and Technology Program (JCYJ20220531103004008), International Cooperative Research Program of Shenzhen (GJHZ20220913143006011) and Medicine-Engineering Interdisciplinary Research Foundation of Shenzhen University (2023YG018).

This manuscript utilized AI tools (Grammarly and ChatGPT)for language polishing.

Author information

Author notes
  1. Fanchun Zeng and Yuan Chen have contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Guangdong Key Laboratory for Biomedical Measurements and Ultrasound Imaging, School of Biomedical Engineering, Medical School, National-Regional Key Technology Engineering Laboratory for Medical Ultrasound, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China

    Fanchun Zeng, Yuan Chen, Minggan Guo & Zhongyi Sun

  2. Department of Urology, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400042, China

    Fanchun Zeng & Zhongyi Sun

  3. Department of Urinary Surgery, Daping Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, China

    Fanchun Zeng, Fengwen Fu, Quanfu Cao & Zhongyi Sun

  4. Reproductive Medicine Center, Shenzhen Hengsheng Hospital, Shenzhen, 518060, China

    Quanfu Cao & Zhongyi Sun

Authors
  1. Fanchun Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuan Chen
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Minggan Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fengwen Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Quanfu Cao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhongyi Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conception and design: Zhongyi Sun, Fanchun Zeng. Collection data: Fanchun Zeng, Fengwen Fu, Quanfu Cao,Minggan Guo,Yuan Chen. Data analysis and interpretation: Zhongyi Sun and Fanchun Zeng. Manuscript preparation: Fanchun Zeng, Revision of the manuscript: Zhongyi Sun. Manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fanchun Zeng or Zhongyi Sun.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics

The experiments adhered to the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals and were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of the Third Military Medical University Daping Hospital (Animal Ethics Approval :Medical Research and Review (2015) No. 53).

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zeng, F., Chen, Y., Guo, M. et al. Biological welding enables rapid and efficient bladder cystotomy closure and reveals the underlying repair mechanism. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36959-4

Download citation

  • Received: 20 November 2025

  • Accepted: 19 January 2026

  • Published: 06 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36959-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Biological welding
  • Bladder rupture repair
  • Mechanism research
  • Surgical efficiency
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing