Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Prospective randomized trial of triple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure for acute abdominal pain
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 January 2026

Prospective randomized trial of triple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure for acute abdominal pain

  • Xirang Wang1,
  • Jian Kang2,
  • Yuxiang Li1,
  • Xiaofeng Sun1,
  • Jun Zhang1,
  • Yunpeng Wu1,
  • Hehui Tao1,
  • Li Wang1,
  • Ruizhou Rong1,
  • Miao Wang1,
  • Kang Liu1 &
  • …
  • Zhen Ban1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 276 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical research

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) combined with choledochoscopy and primary closure without T-tube drainage in managing acute abdominal pain caused by choledocholithiasis (common bile duct stones, CBDS) and cholecystolithiasis with acute cholecystitis. A single-center prospective study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital, from April 2024 to February 2025. Sixty-one patients with acute abdominal pain due to CBDS and cholecystolithiasis with acute cholecystitis were randomized into two groups: T-tube-free group (n = 35), Triple-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + LCBDE with primary closure; T-tube group (n = 26), Four-port LC + LCBDE with T-tube drainage. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Baseline characteristics were comparable (all P > 0.05). The T-tube-free group demonstrated superior outcomes in operative time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, duration of abdominal drainage, and hospital stay (all P < 0.05). Each group had one case of biliary leakage, both resolved conservatively. No mortality, pancreatitis, conversion to open surgery, residual stones, biliary hemorrhage, or strictures occurred in either group. Triple-port LC combined with LCBDE and primary closure without T-tube drainage is safe and feasible for acute abdominal pain. Compared to T-tube drainage, this approach better aligns with the principles of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS).

Similar content being viewed by others

Feasibility and safety of choledochotomy primary closure in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration without biliary drainage: a retrospective study

Article Open access 18 December 2023

Management of biliary diseases after the failure of initial needle knife precut sphincterotomy for biliary cannulation

Article Open access 22 July 2021

Primary closure with self-disengaging biliary stent following laparoscopic CBD exploration in normal-diameter ducts: a propensity score matching study

Article Open access 06 June 2025

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article. Further minor datasets are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

LCBDE:

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

CBDS:

Common bile duct stones

LC:

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

ERAS:

Enhanced recovery after surgery

CBD:

Common bile duct

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

ASA:

American Society of Anesthesiologists

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CVS:

Critical View of Safety

MRCP:

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography

POD:

Postoperative day

EST:

Endoscopic sphincterotomy

ERCP:

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

References

  1. Costanzo, M. L., D’Andrea, V., Lauro, A. & Bellini, M. I. Acute cholecystitis from biliary lithiasis: Diagnosis, management and treatment. Antibiotics 12(3), 482 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shabanzadeh, D. M. et al. National clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of symptomatic gallstone disease: 2021 recommendations from the Danish surgical society. Scand. J. Surg. 111(3), 11–30 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fugazzola, P. et al. Prospective validation of the Israeli Score for the prediction of common bile duct stones in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Surg. Endosc. 37(11), 8562–8569 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaouch, M. A. et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single-stage laparoscopic versus two-stage endoscopic management followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy of preoperatively diagnosed common bile duct stones. Medicine 104(11), e41902 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, J. & Duan, X. Sequential comparison of single-stage laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with cholecystectomy. Updates Surg. (2025).

  6. Zhu, J. et al. Minimally invasive management of concomitant gallstones and common bile duct stones: An updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Surg. Endosc. 37(3), 1683–1693 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, R. H. et al. Usefulness of intraoperative choledochoscopy in laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis. Ann. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 29, 192–198 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, X. et al. Clinical effect analysis of three-port laparoscopic and choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration without T-tube in the treatment of emergency cholecystolithiasis combined with common bile duct stones. Hum. Biol. 95(1), 1010–1014 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, L. & Chen, Z. Comparison of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the treatment of bile duct stones and analysis of risk factors for postoperative acute pancreatitis. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 29(6), 358–363 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu, F. et al. Short-term efficacy of LCBDE+LC versus ERCP/EST+LC in the treatment of cholelithiasis combined with common bile duct stones: A retrospective cohort study. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg Tech. A. 35(2), 145–151 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaneta, A. et al. Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis. BMC Surg. 22(1), 224 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Institutional Research Fund of [Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital] (Grant No. KY-2024-04).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital, Beijing, 100069, China

    Xirang Wang, Yuxiang Li, Xiaofeng Sun, Jun Zhang, Yunpeng Wu, Hehui Tao, Li Wang, Ruizhou Rong, Miao Wang, Kang Liu & Zhen Ban

  2. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Huimin Hospital, Beijing, 100054, China

    Jian Kang

Authors
  1. Xirang Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jian Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuxiang Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiaofeng Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jun Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yunpeng Wu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hehui Tao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Li Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Ruizhou Rong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Miao Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kang Liu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Zhen Ban
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors; the requirements for authorship have been met; each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work. XRW conducted the literature search, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. YXL and JK provided guidance. XFS, JZ, YPW, HHT, LW, RZR, MW, KL and ZB collected the data. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jian Kang or Yuxiang Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Helsinki Declaration and its amendments. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of [Beijing Fengtai Youanmen Hospital] (Grant No. LL-2024-04). All patients or their legal guardians provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study.

Consent for publication

Obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Kang, J., Li, Y. et al. Prospective randomized trial of triple port laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration and primary closure for acute abdominal pain. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37034-8

Download citation

  • Received: 29 May 2025

  • Accepted: 19 January 2026

  • Published: 22 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37034-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Choledocholithiasis
  • CBDS
  • Laparoscopy
  • Choledochoscopic exploration
  • T-tube drainage
  • Prospective study
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing