Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Optimization of ecological and efficient restoration technology for green mines based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

Optimization of ecological and efficient restoration technology for green mines based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS

  • Bin Wang1,
  • Daoran Guo1,
  • Jing Sun1,
  • Jian Guo2,
  • Shangrong Gao2 &
  • …
  • Wanli Lu3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Ecology
  • Engineering
  • Environmental sciences
  • Natural hazards
  • Solid Earth sciences

Abstract

The geological conditions of mines are complex and diverse, and existing restoration methods may not be sufficient to meet the requirements for all types of mine rehabilitation. A study on the optimization of ecological restoration technologies for green mines based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS has been proposed, offering a novel approach for selecting ecological restoration solutions for rock slopes in green mines. First, a remote 3D laser scanner is used to construct a digital terrain model (DTM) for the target mine. Then, based on characteristics such as geological lithology, slope aspect, and slope angle, the open-pit mine slopes are divided into zones. Finally, the rock mass quality of each slope zone is evaluated using eight indicators, including uniaxial saturated compressive strength, rock quality designation (RQD), structural plane condition, joint spacing, and integrity coefficient. The evaluation process specifically includes: constructing a hesitant fuzzy decision matrix based on the eight key indicators for each slope zone; objectively determining the weights of the indicators using the maximum deviation method to minimize subjectivity; calculating the weighted distance between each slope zone scheme and the defined hesitant fuzzy positive/negative ideal solutions; determining the relative closeness coefficient for each zone to classify the rock mass quality grade. Based on the grading results, the most suitable ecological restoration techniques are matched to each slope zone to achieve differentiated ecological restoration. Experimental results show that the mining slope is divided into seven zones using this approach. After ecological restoration, near-ground dust is effectively controlled. The vegetation restoration rate reaches up to 25%, whereas the rates of comparative methods are all below 15%. This indicates that the proposed method can help improve restoration efficiency and quality, promote sustainable development, better meet the requirements for efficient ecological restoration in mines, and possesses practical applicability.

Similar content being viewed by others

Machine learning based prediction of geotechnical parameters affecting slope stability in open-pit iron ore mines in high precipitation zone

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Optimizing design and stability of open pit slopes in Tolay coal mine, Ethiopia

Article Open access 10 January 2025

Study on comprehensive landslide risk zoning method in open pit mines under multi factor coupling effects

Article Open access 01 July 2025

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. Rebello, S., Anoopkumar, A. N., Aneesh, E. M., Sindhu, R. & Pandey, A. Hazardous mineral mining: Challenges and solutions. J Hazard. Mater. 402(1), 1–12 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jowitt, S. & Mcnulty, B. Geology and mining: mineral resources and reserves: Their estimation, use, and abuse. Econ. Geol. 11(125), 27–36 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thakur, T. K. et al. Assessment of land degradation and restoration in coal mines of central india: A time series analysis. Ecol. Eng. 175(11), 1–15 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mazumder, P., Das, A., Khwairakpam, M. & Kalamdhad, A. S. A comprehensive insight into ecological risk assessment and remediation of metal contaminated coal mine soil: Towards a cleaner and sustainable environment. J. Clean. Prod. 324(15), 1–9 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. García-Cervilla, R., Santos, A., Romero, A. & Lorenzo, D. Remediation of soil contaminated by lindane wastes using alkaline activated persulfate: kinetic model. Chem. Eng. J. 393(2), 2–16 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Torres, C. & Verschoor, G. Re-imagining environmental governance: gold dredge mining vs territorial health in the colombian amazon. Geoforum 117(5), 124–133 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Azizi, S., Brzel, T., Hansen, H. K. & Vakkayil, J. Governance settlements and transitions in indigenous areas of limited statehood: The case of coalmining in meghalaya. Bus. Soc. 60(7), 1643–1674 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Upadhyay, S. K. & Edrisi, S. A. Developing sustainable measures to restore fly ash contaminated lands: current challenges and future prospects. Land Degrad. Dev. 32(17), 4817–4831 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yadav, S., Pandey, V. C., Kumar, M. & Singh, L. Plant diversity and ecological potential of naturally colonizing vegetation for ecorestoration of fly ash disposal area. Ecol. Eng. 176(9), 1–8 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raiesi, F. & Salek-Gilani, S. Development of a soil quality index for characterizing effects of land-use changes on degradation and ecological restoration of rangeland soils in a semi-arid ecosystem. Land Degrad. Dev. 31(12), 1533–1544 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jia, M. X. et al. Ecological restoration of mines based on Nature-based Solution:a review. Coal Sci. Technol. 52(8), 209–221 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qiao, X. D. & Yu, Z. J. Research on ecological restoration technology of historical mines in Xin’an County section of Yellow River Basin. China Energy Environ. Prot. 45(1), 96–103 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew, M., Chakrabortty, R. K. & Ryan, M. J. Selection of an optimal maintenance strategy under uncertain conditions: An interval type-2 fuzzy ahp-topsis method. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 99, 1–14 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mahmood, T. & Ali, Z. Entropy measure and topsis method based on correlation coefficient using complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy information and its application to multiple attribute decision making. Soft Comput. 25(2), 1249–1275 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Cantillo, J., Martin, J. C. & Román, C. A hybrid-fuzzy topsis method to analyze the consumption and buying behavior of fishery and aquaculture products (faps) in the eu28. Br. Food J. 122(11), 3403–3417 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaber, H., Marle, F., Vidal, L. A., Sarigol, I. & Didiez, L. A framework to evaluate project complexity using the fuzzy topsis method. Sustainability 13(6), 20–30 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guo, Y. Y. et al. Fuzzy control algorithm based on electronically controlled proportional variable pump. Ordnance Mater. Sci. Eng. 44(6), 103–106 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, W. J. Simulation of software secret data loss prevention transmission based on mobile gateway. Comput. Simul. 38(11), 459–463 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Un-Noor, F. et al. Operational feasibility assessment of battery electric construction equipment based on in-use activity data. Transp. Res. Rec. 2675(9), 809–820 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Azarafza, M. et al. Development of a 2D and 3D computational algorithm for discontinuity structural geometry identification by artificial intelligence based on image processing techniques. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 78(5), 3371 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lei, G. et al. Analysis of slope stability management and ecological restoration technologies in open-pit mines. J. Civ. Eng. Urban Plan. 7(3), 303 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xiang, Y. et al. Research progress of mine ecological restoration technology. Resources 14(6), 100–100 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kruk, N. M., Millán, P. A. & Batista, T. Y. Evaluation of the efficiency of implementation of the sustainable development program at nickel-cobalt ore mining enterprises. Sustainability 17(21), 9441–9441 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wang, F. et al. An improved segformer for semantic segmentation of UAV-based mine restoration scenes. Sensors 25(12), 3827–3827 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson, R. M., Hoose, B. W., Anderson, V. J., Hansen, N. C. & Madsen, M. D. Influence of seed conglomeration technology and planting season on wyoming big sagebrush restoration. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 77(16), 126–135 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Shandong Provincial Geo-mineral Engineering Exploration Institute, Jinan, 250014, China

    Bin Wang, Daoran Guo & Jing Sun

  2. Shandong Land and Space Ecological Restoration Center, Jinan, 250000, China

    Jian Guo & Shangrong Gao

  3. Shandong Yellow River Ecological Development Group Co., Ltd., Jinan, 250000, China

    Wanli Lu

Authors
  1. Bin Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daoran Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jing Sun
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jian Guo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shangrong Gao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wanli Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Bin Wang: Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Writing—Review and Editing, Investigation, Conceptualization, Supervision, Project administration, Formal Analysis Daoran Guo: Data Curation, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Visualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Software, Resources Jing Sun: Conceptualization, Writing—Review and Editing, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Data Curation, Formal Analysis Jian Guo: Writing—Review and Editing, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Investigation, Visualization Shangrong Gao: Methodology, Formal Analysis, Writing—Review and Editing, Writing—Original Draft Preparation Wanli Lu: Writing—Review and Editing, Writing—Original Draft Preparation, Data Curation.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wanli Lu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Permission

The authors state permission is granted to Springer Nature Limited, to publish the images under a CC BY open access license.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, B., Guo, D., Sun, J. et al. Optimization of ecological and efficient restoration technology for green mines based on hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37060-6

Download citation

  • Received: 30 July 2025

  • Accepted: 19 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37060-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS
  • Green mine
  • Ecological restoration
  • 3D laser scanning
  • Rock mass quality
  • Digital terrain model (DTM)
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene