Table 6 Analysis of differences in forward selection regression process results according to GAM for BYD Lake.
No. | Model structure | Deviance explained | AIC | GCV | R-sq.(adj) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | WL | 67.4% | 47.99 | 0.2196 | 0.654 |
2 | WL+TP | 77.8% | 37.95 | 0.1669 | 0.751 |
3 | WL+TP+AT | 79.8% | 37.77 | 0.1688 | 0.761 |
4 | WL+TP+AT+AT*TP | 79.8% | 37.77 | 0.1688 | 0.761 |
5 | WL+TP+AT+WL*AT | 88.4% | 29.70 | 0.1502 | 0.829 |
6 | WL+TP+AT+WL*TP | 98.7% | -19.93 | 0.1074 | 0.952 |