Table 6 Simulation results of screening efficiency corresponding to different numbers of screen layers.
From: Research on the optimization efficiency of secondary vibrating screening based on EDEM simulation
Particle diameter(mm) | Proportion(%) | \(\:{\varvec{\eta\:}}_{\varvec{r}}\)(L1) | \(\:{\varvec{\eta\:}}_{\varvec{r}}(\)L2) | \(\:{\varvec{\eta\:}}_{\varvec{r}}\)(L3) | \(\:{\varvec{\eta\:}}_{\varvec{r}}(\)L4) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
175 | 5 | 73.0 | 84.5 | 88.0 | 92.5 |
135 | 10 | 70.0 | 82.0 | 86.3 | 89.2 |
110 | 10 | 68.6 | 80.4 | 85.1 | 87.5 |
90 | 15 | 80.5 | 87.9 | 92.7 | 93.8 |
70 | 20 | 82.4 | 86.3 | 92.0 | 94.3 |
50 | 20 | 85.4 | 92.6 | 93.5 | 95.0 |
30 | 12 | 88.7 | 94.6 | 96.3 | 95.3 |
10 | 8 | 90.1 | 95.3 | 97.4 | 96.5 |
\(\:{{\eta\:}}_{{T}}\)Â Â | 100 | 80.8 | 88.4 | 92.4 | 93.8 |
