Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Rapid clearance of bacteria from maternal bloodstream after delivery in pregnancies complicated by preterm pre-labor rupture of the membranes
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 30 January 2026

Rapid clearance of bacteria from maternal bloodstream after delivery in pregnancies complicated by preterm pre-labor rupture of the membranes

  • Catalin S. Buhimschi1,
  • Guomao Zhao1,
  • Kara M. Rood2,3,
  • Lindsey Solden4,
  • Shaylyn D. Webster2,
  • Manel Guessas4,
  • Stephanie Hearne4,
  • Anthony Moussa4,
  • Sonia Guessas4,
  • Hongwu Jing1,
  • Kathryn Berryman2,3,
  • William E. Ackerman1 &
  • …
  • Irina A. Buhimschi1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Medical research
  • Microbiology

Abstract

Preterm pre-labor rupture of membranes (PPROM) increases maternal and neonatal sepsis risk, yet its association with maternal microbial translocation and systemic inflammation remains unclear. We investigated whether PPROM is linked to microbial DNA in maternal blood (MB) and inflammatory responses around delivery. In 66 PPROM patients (median GA: 32 weeks), MB was collected pre-delivery and within 1 h postpartum. Fetal membranes (FM) and placental tissues were sampled immediately after delivery. Bacterial load and diversity were analyzed via 16 S rDNA qPCR and sequencing. Maternal cytokines were quantified by multiplex immunoassay, and fetal inflammatory exposure (Triple I) assessed using histological chorioamnionitis (HCA), cord blood haptoglobin, and IL-6. Bacterial DNA was detected in maternal blood (MB) pre- and post-delivery, with a significant postpartum decline (p = 0.004). FM carried higher bacterial load and biodiversity than placenta (p < 0.001), dominated by Mycoplasma spp. Maternal IL-6 and IL-10 levels rose postpartum (p < 0.05), particularly in cases with fetal inflammatory exposure. Limited overlap was found between MB and tissue microbial taxa. In conclusion, bacterial DNA is detectable in maternal circulation in patients with PPROM before birth but rapidly clears postpartum alongside a robust cytokine surge, suggesting efficient clearance and dynamic inflammatory changes.

Data availability

The anonymized dataset generated and analyzed during the current study is available from the Zenodo repository at: (https:/doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16898408) . Patient level clinical data is not openly available due to privacy concerns but is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. The raw and processed amplicon sequencing data are available in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database at the accession number GSE306804.

References

  1. Underwood, M. A., Gilbert, W. M. & Sherman, M. P. Amniotic fluid: not just fetal urine anymore. J. Perinatol. 25 (5), 341–348 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Menon, R. & Moore, J. J. Fetal membranes, not a Mere appendage of the placenta, but a critical part of the fetal-maternal interface controlling parturition. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North. Am. 47 (1), 147–162 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seong, H. S., Lee, S. E., Kang, J. H., Romero, R. & Yoon, B. H. The frequency of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and histologic chorioamnionitis in women at term with intact membranes in the presence or absence of labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 199 (4), 375e1–375e5 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doyle, R. M. et al. Bacterial communities found in placental tissues are associated with severe chorioamnionitis and adverse birth outcomes. PLoS One. 12 (7), e0180167 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aagaard, K. et al. The placenta harbors a unique Microbiome. Sci. Transl Med. 6 (237), 237ra65 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Theis, K. R., Romero, R., Winters, A. D., Jobe, A. H. & Gomez-Lopez, N. Lack of evidence for microbiota in the placental and fetal tissues of rhesus macaques. mSphere 5 (3), e00210–e00220 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Prince, A. L. et al. The placental membrane Microbiome is altered among subjects with spontaneous preterm birth with and without chorioamnionitis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 214 (5), 627e1–627e16 (2016).

  8. Perez-Muñoz, M. E., Arrieta, M. C., Ramer-Tait, A. E. & Walter, J. A critical assessment of the sterile womb and in utero colonization hypotheses: implications for research on the pioneer infant Microbiome. Microbiome 5 (1), 48 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blaser, M. J. et al. Lessons learned from the prenatal Microbiome controversy. Microbiome 9 (1), 8 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Leiby, J. S. et al. Lack of detection of a human placenta Microbiome in samples from preterm and term deliveries. Microbiome 6 (1), 196 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Galask, R. P., Varner, M. W., Petzold, C. R. & Wilbur, S. L. Bacterial attachment to the chorioamniotic membranes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 148, 915–928 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bond, D. M. et al. Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks’ gestation for improving pregnancy outcome. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 3 (3), CD004735 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Morris, J. M. et al. Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387 (10017), 444–452 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Archabald, K. L. et al. Limiting the exposure of select fetuses to intrauterine infection/ inflammation improves short-term neonatal outcomes in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Fetal Diagn. Ther. 42, 99–110 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Siegler, Y., Weiner, Z. & Solt, I. ACOG practice bulletin 217: prelabor rupture of membranes. Obstet. Gynecol. 136, 1061 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Menon, R. & Richardson, L. S. Preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes: A disease of the fetal membranes. Semin Perinatol. 41 (7), 409–419 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Romero, R. et al. Evidence that intra-amniotic infections are often the result of an ascending invasion - a molecular Microbiological study. J. Perinat. Med. 47 (9), 915–931 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buhimschi, C. S. et al. Fetal inflammatory response in women with proteomic biomarkers characteristic of intra-amniotic inflammation and preterm birth. BJOG 116 (2), 257–267 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gomez-Arango, L. F. et al. Contributions of the maternal oral and gut Microbiome to placental microbial colonization in overweight and obese pregnant women. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 2860 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gotschlich, E. C., Colbert, R. A. & Gill, T. Methods in Microbiome research: Past, present, and future. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 33 (6), 101498 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Han, Y. W., Shen, T., Chung, P., Buhimschi, I. A. & Buhimschi, C. S. Uncultivated bacteria as etiologic agents of intra-amniotic inflammation leading to preterm birth. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47 (1), 38–47 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, X. et al. Comparative microbial analysis of paired amniotic fluid and cord blood from pregnancies complicated by preterm birth and early-onset neonatal sepsis. PLoS One. 8 (2), e56131 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Buhimschi, C. S., Mesiano, S. & Muglia, L. J. Chapter 7. Pathogenesis of spontaneous preterm birth preterm birth syndrome: phenotypic classification mechanisms of spontaneous preterm birth phenotypic components of the preterm birth syndrome. In: Creasy RK, Resnik R, Lockwood CJ, Moore TR, Green MF, Copel JA, Silver RM. Creasy and Resnik’s Maternal Fetal Medicine. pp 96-126. Ed: Saunders, Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA 19103-2899 (2018).

  24. Dulay, A. T. et al. Compartmentalization of acute phase reactants Interleukin-6, C-Reactive protein and procalcitonin as biomarkers of intra-amniotic infection and chorioamnionitis. Cytokine 76 (2), 236–243 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Buhimschi, C. S. et al. Proteomics mapping of cord blood identifies haptoglobin switch-on pattern as biomarker of early-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm newborns. PLoS One. 6 (10), e26111 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Buhimschi, C. S. et al. Cord blood haptoglobin, cerebral palsy and death in infants of women at risk for preterm birth: a secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 9, 11–18 (2019). Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Higgins, R. D. et al. Chorioamnionitis workshop Participants. Evaluation and management of women and newborns with a maternal diagnosis of chorioamnionitis: summary of a workshop. Obstet. Gynecol. 127 (3), 426–436 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sorrenti, S. et al. Outcome of prelabor rupture of membranes before or at the limit of viability: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM. 6 (6), 101370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101370 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Boggess, K. A. et al. Bacteremia shortly after placental separation during Cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 87 (5 Pt 1), 779–784 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCormack, W. M., Rosner, B., Lee, Y. H., Rankin, J. S. & Lin, J. S. Isolation of genital Mycoplasmas from blood obtained shortly after vaginal delivery. Lancet 1 (7907), 596–599 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mantis, N. J. Role of B cells and antibodies in controlling bacterial pathogens. In: Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Fourth Edition); ED: Thomas M. Schmidt, Elsevier, pg: 194–200. (2019).

  32. Minasyan, H. Phagocytosis and oxycytosis: two arms of human innate immunity. Immunol. Res. 66 (2), 271–280 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Krezalek, M. A. et al. The intestinal Microbiome and surgical disease. Curr. Probl. Surg. 53 (6), 257–293 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Cheng, H. S. et al. The blood Microbiome and health: current evidence, controversies, and challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (6), 5633 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sciarra, F., Franceschini, E., Campolo, F. & Venneri, M. A. The diagnostic potential of the human blood microbiome: are we dreaming or awake? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 24 (13), 10422 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tan, C. C. S. et al. No evidence for a common blood Microbiome based on a population study of 9,770 healthy humans. Nat. Microbiol. 8 (5), 973–985 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Barker, J. H. et al. The role of complement opsonization in interactions between F. tularensis subsp. Novicida and human neutrophils. Microbes Infect. 11 (8-9), 762–769 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tanaka, T., Narazaki, M. & Kishimoto, T. IL-6 in inflammation, immunity, and disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol. 6 (10), a016295 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Goldmann, O., Nwofor, O. V., Chen, Q. & Medina, E. Mechanisms underlying immunosuppression by regulatory cells. Front. Immunol. 15, 1328193 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Murtha, A. P. et al. Maternal serum interleukin-6 concentrations in patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes and evidence of infection. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 175 (4 Pt 1), 966–969 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Gulati, S. et al. Interleukin-6 as a predictor of subclinical chorioamnionitis in preterm premature rupture of membranes. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 67(3), 235–240 (2012).

  42. Cobo, T. et al. Systemic and local inflammatory response in women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes. PLoS One. 9(1), e85277 (2014).

  43. Arora, P. et al. Mean gestation at delivery and histological chorioamnionitis correlates with early-onset neonatal sepsis following expectant management in pPROM. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 35 (3), 235–240 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Leão, I. et al. Pseudomonadota in the oral cavity: a glimpse into the environment-human nexus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 107 (2-3), 517–534 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rizzatti, G., Lopetuso, L. R., Gibiino, G., Binda, C. & Gasbarrini, A. Proteobacteria: A common factor in human diseases. Biomed. Res. Int. 2017, 9351507 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Parsot, C. Shigella spp. And enteroinvasive Escherichia coli pathogenicity factors. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 252 (1), 11–18 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  47. American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology Committee Opinion 161. Method for estimating due date. Obstet. Gynecol. 124, 863–866 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on practice Bulletins–Obstetrics. practice bulletin 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 120, 964–973 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  49. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins -Obstetrics. ACOG practice bulletin 172: premature rupture of membranes. Obstet. Gynecol. 128, e165–e177 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Tita, A. T. & Andrews, W. W. Diagnosis and management of clinical chorioamnionitis. Clin Perinatol. 37(2), 339–354 (2010).

  51. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins -Obstetrics. Prelabor Rupture of Membranes: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 217. Obstet. Gynecol. 135(3), e80–e97 (2020).

  52. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion 712: intrapartum management of intraamniotic infection. Obstet. Gynecol. 130 (2), e95–e101 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Rood, K. M. et al. Skin microbiota in obese women at risk for surgical site infection after Cesarean delivery. Sci. Rep. 8 (1), 8756 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nadkarni, M. A., Martin, F. E., Jacques, N. A. & Hunter, N. Determination of bacterial load by real-time PCR using a broad-range (universal) probe and primers set. Microbiology 148 (1), 257–266 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Eisenberg, E. & Levanon, E. Y. Human housekeeping genes, revisited. Trends Genet. 29 (10), 569–574 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Dhariwal, A. et al. MicrobiomeAnalyst - a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of Microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res. 45 (W1), W180–W188 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by research funds from the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine at The Ohio State University College of Medicine and from The Center for Perinatal Research at The Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH. Additionally, participation of Anthony J. Moussa was made possible through funds provided by Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development (NICHD) R25 HD086885 Futures Matter: Transformative Transdisciplinary Summer Research Program (to I.A.B.). The funding sources had no involvement in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois Chicago College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60612, USA

    Catalin S. Buhimschi, Guomao Zhao, Hongwu Jing, William E. Ackerman & Irina A. Buhimschi

  2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA

    Kara M. Rood, Shaylyn D. Webster & Kathryn Berryman

  3. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA

    Kara M. Rood & Kathryn Berryman

  4. Center for Perinatal Research, The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, 43215, USA

    Lindsey Solden, Manel Guessas, Stephanie Hearne, Anthony Moussa & Sonia Guessas

Authors
  1. Catalin S. Buhimschi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guomao Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kara M. Rood
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lindsey Solden
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shaylyn D. Webster
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Manel Guessas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stephanie Hearne
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anthony Moussa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sonia Guessas
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Hongwu Jing
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Kathryn Berryman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. William E. Ackerman
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Irina A. Buhimschi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: CSB, IAB; Patient enrollment: SW, KMR, KB, CSB; Laboratory methods and analyses: GZ, LS, SDW, MG, SH, AM, SG, HJ, WEA, IAB; Supervision: IAB, CSB; Writing—original draft: CSB, IAB; Writing—review & editing: AM, KMR, LS, SDW, MG, SG, SH, HJ, GZ, KB, WEA, IAB, CSB.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Catalin S. Buhimschi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Institutional review board statement

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national guidelines on human experimentation (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Policy for Protection of Human Subjects) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008, and has been approved by the Institutional Review Boards at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and The Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Buhimschi, C.S., Zhao, G., Rood, K.M. et al. Rapid clearance of bacteria from maternal bloodstream after delivery in pregnancies complicated by preterm pre-labor rupture of the membranes. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37231-5

Download citation

  • Received: 12 August 2025

  • Accepted: 20 January 2026

  • Published: 30 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37231-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology