Abstract
Biochar has emerged as a promising strategy for carbon sequestration in the context of climate change and carbon neutrality goals. Among various feedstocks, underutilized forest biomass (UFB) holds significant potential for conversion into high-value carbon materials. However, the heterogeneity of UFB and the high cost of conventional analyses highlight the need for rapid prediction techniques for key carbon indicators, such as carbon content, atomic oxygen-to-carbon ratio, and atomic hydrogen-to-carbon ratio. This study proposes a chemometric model that non-destructively predicts the carbonization characteristics of biochar using attenuated total reflectance infrared (ATR-IR) spectroscopy combined with partial least squares regression (PLSR). Twenty biochar samples were produced from UFB at carbonization temperatures of 200 °C, 300 °C, and 400 °C. The ATR-IR spectra were preprocessed using normalization and second-derivative transformation before being used to construct the predictive models. The optimized PLSR models, which were validated through cross-validation and outlier removal, achieved high prediction accuracy for all three carbon indices (R² > 0.94). Variable importance in projection (VIP) analysis further identified the key spectral regions contributing to the model performance. These findings demonstrate that high predictive power and interpretability can be achieved without the use of complex machine learning algorithms, providing a practical analytical tool for assessing the quality of biochar and for the efficient utilization of forest residues.
Data availability
The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Amelung, W. et al. Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7 (2020).
Don, A. et al. Carbon sequestration in soils and climate change mitigation—Definitions and pitfalls. Glob Chang. Biol. 30, e16983. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16983 (2024).
Clarke, B., Otto, F., Stuart-Smith, R. & Harrington, L. Extreme weather impacts of climate change: an attribution perspective. Environ. Res. Climate 1, 012001 (2022).
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Climate change impacts (2025). https://www.noaa.gov/education/resource-collections/climate/climate-change-impacts
Wang, F. et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innov. 2, 100180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100180 (2021).
Yang, M. et al. Circular economy strategies for combating climate change and other environmental issues. Environ. Chem. Lett. 21, 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-022-01499-6 (2023).
Kapoor, R. T., Ahmad, P. & Rafatullah, M. Insights into biochar applications: a sustainable strategy toward carbon neutrality and circular economy. In Catalytic applications of biochar for environmental remediation: Sustainable strategies towards a circular economy 1–30, (2024).
Shoudho, K. N. et al. Biochar in global carbon cycle: towards sustainable development goals. Curr. Res. Green. Sustain. Chem. 8, 100409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crgsc.2024.100409 (2024).
Gheorghe, C., Marculescu, C., Badea, A., Dinca, C. & Apostol, T. Effect of pyrolysis conditions on bio-char production from biomass. In Proceedings of the 3rd WSEAS International Conference on Renewable Energy Sources, 239–241, (2009).
Bartoli, M., Giorcelli, M., Jagdale, P., Rovere, M. & Tagliaferro, A. A review of non-soil Biochar applications. Mater 13, 261. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13020261 (2020).
Mishra, R. K. & Mohanty, K. A review of the next-generation Biochar production from waste biomass for material applications. Sci. Total Environ. 904, 167171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167171 (2023).
Oliveira, F. R. et al. Environmental application of biochar: current status and perspectives. Bioresour Technol. 246, 110–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.122 (2017).
Shyam, S., Ahmed, S., Joshi, S. J. & Sarma, H. Biochar as a Soil amendment: implications for soil health, carbon sequestration, and climate resilience. Discov. Soil 2, 18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44378-025-00041-8 (2025).
Wang, D., Li, C., Parikh, S. J. & Scow, K. M. Impact of Biochar on water retention of two agricultural soils – a multi-scale analysis. Geoderma 340, 185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.01.012 (2019).
Solutions for Our Climate. Subsidized deforestation: 10 years of biomass power in South Korea (2023). https://content.forourclimate.org/files/research/dyffFUe.pdf
Yun, S., Choi, S. M., Lee, J. W. & Park, S. M. Estimation of unused forest biomass potential resource amount in Korea. Korean J. Agric. Sci. 49, 317–330 (2022).
Cheng, J., Hu, S. C., Sun, G. T., Geng, Z. C. & Zhu, M. Q. The effect of pyrolysis temperature on the characteristics of biochar, pyroligneous acids, and gas prepared from cotton stalk through a polygeneration process. Ind. Crop Prod. 170, 113690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113690 (2021).
Nzediegwu, C., Naeth, M. A. & Chang, S. X. Elemental composition of biochars is affected by methods used for its determination. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 156, 105174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105174 (2021).
Zhang, S., Sun, Z., Yao, Y., Wang, X. & Tian, S. Spectral characterization of the impact of modifiers and different prepare temperatures on snow Lotus medicinal residue-biochar and dissolved organic matter. Sci. Rep. 14, 8493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-57553-6 (2024).
Kim, P. et al. Surface functionality and carbon structures in lignocellulosic-derived biochars produced by fast pyrolysis. Energ. Fuel. 25, 4693–4703 (2011).
McCall, M. A., Watson, J. S. & Sephton, M. A. Predicting stability of barley straw-derived biochars using fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. ACS Sustain. Resour. Manag 1, 1975–1983 (2024).
Hai, A. et al. Machine learning models for the prediction of total yield and specific surface area of biochar derived from agricultural biomass by pyrolysis. Environ. Technol. Innov. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eti.2023.103071 (2023).
Yaseen, A. M. & Alhalimi, F. L. Heavy metal adsorption efficiency prediction using Biochar properties: a comparative analysis for ensemble machine learning models. Sci. Rep. 15, 13434. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96271-5 (2025).
Allohverdi, T., Mohanty, A. K., Roy, P. & Misra, M. A review on current status of Biochar uses in agriculture. Mol 26, 5584. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26185584 (2021).
Patel, M. R. & Panwar, N. L. Biochar from agricultural crop residues: Environmental, production, and life cycle assessment overview. Resour. Conserv. Recycl Adv. 19, 200173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2023.200173 (2023).
Indayaningsih, N., Destyorini, F., Purawiardi, R. I., Insiyanda, D. R. & Widodo, H. IOP publishing, production of activated carbon by using pyrolysis process in an ammonia atmosphere. J. Phy. Conf. Series 817, 012006 (2017).
Vafaeenezhad, H., Zebarjad, S. M. & Khaki, J. V. Intelligent modeling using fuzzy rule-based technique for evaluating wood carbonization process parameters. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 68, 1471–1478 (2013).
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. & Friedman, J. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data mining, inference, and Prediction (Springer, 2009).
Savitzky, A. & Golay, M. J. E. Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures. Anal. Chem. 36, 1627–1639 (1964).
Jolliffe, I. T. & Cadima, J. Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos. Trans. R Soc. A. 374, 20150202. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0202 (2016).
Wold, S., Johansson, E. & Cocchi, M. PLS: partial least squares projections to latent structures. In 3D QSAR in drug design: recent advances (eds. Kubinyi, H., Folkers, G. & Martin, Y. G.) 523–550 (Kluwer/ESCOM, (1993).
Montgomery, D. C., Peck, E. A. & Vining, G. G. Introduction To Linear Regression Analysis (Wiley, 2021).
Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52, 591–611 (1965).
Razali, N. M. & Wah, Y. B. Power comparisons of shapiro-wilk, kolmogorov-smirnov, Lilliefors and anderson-darling tests. J. Stat. Model. Anal. 2, 21–33 (2011).
Sheng, Y. et al. Outlier identification in radiation therapy knowledge-based planning: a study of pelvic cases. Med. Phys. 44, 5617–5626. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12556 (2017).
Chong, I. G. & Jun, C. H. Performance of some variable selection methods when multicollinearity is present. Chemom Intell. Lab. Syst. 78, 103–112 (2005).
Keiluweit, M., Nico, P. S., Johnson, M. G. & Kleber, M. Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environ. Sci. Technol. 44, 1247–1253 (2010).
Xiao, X., Chen, Z. & Chen, B. H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of biochars derived from diverse precursory materials. Sci. Rep. 6, 22644. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22644 (2016).
Hofstetter, K., Hinterstoisser, B. & Salmén, L. Moisture uptake in native cellulose–the roles of different hydrogen bonds: a dynamic FT-IR study using deuterium exchange. Cellul 13, 131–145 (2006).
Maréchal, Y. & Chanzy, H. The hydrogen bond network in Iβ cellulose as observed by infrared spectrometry. J. Mol. Struct. 523, 183–196 (2000).
Carrillo, F., Colom, X., Saurina, J. & Suñol. J. J. & Structural FTIR analysis and thermal characterisation of lyocell and viscose-type fibres. Eur. Polym. J. 40, 2229–2234 (2004).
Schwanninger, M., Rodrigues, J. C., Pereira, H. & Hinterstoisser, B. Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vib. Spectrosc. 36, 23–40 (2004).
Delmotte, L., Ganne-Chedeville, C., Leban, J. M., Pizzi, A. & Pichelin, F. CP-MAS 13 C NMR and FT-IR investigation of the degradation reactions of polymer constituents in wood welding. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 93, 406–412 (2008).
Oh, S. Y. et al. Crystalline structure analysis of cellulose treated with sodium hydroxide and carbon dioxide by means of X-ray diffraction and FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohydr. Res. 340, 2376–2391 (2005).
Jouiad, M., Al-Nofeli, N., Khalifa, N., Benyettou, F. & Yousef, L. F. Characteristics of slow pyrolysis biochars produced from Rhodes grass and fronds of edible date palm. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrol. 111, 183–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2014.10.024 (2015).
Leng, L. et al. Nitrogen containing functional groups of biochar: an overview. Bioresour Technol. 298, 122286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122286 (2020).
Jindo, K., Mizumoto, H., Sawada, Y., Sanchez-Monedero, M. A. & Sonoki, T. Physical and chemical characterization of biochars derived from different agricultural residues. Biogeosci 11, 6613–6621. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-6613-2014 (2014).
Sammons, R. J. et al. Characterization of organosolv lignins using thermal and FT-IR spectroscopic analysis. Bioresour 8, 2752–2767 (2013).
Ray, A., Banerjee, A. & Dubey, A. Characterization of biochars from various agricultural by-products using FTIR spectroscopy, SEM focused with image processing. Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 13, 423–430 (2020).
Široký, J., Blackburn, R. S., Bechtold, T., Taylor, J. & White, P. Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy analysis of crystallinity changes in lyocell following continuous treatment with sodium hydroxide. Cellulose 17, 103–115 (2010).
Janu, R. et al. Biochar surface functional groups as affected by biomass feedstock, Biochar composition and pyrolysis temperature. Carbon Resour. Convers. 4, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crcon.2021.01.003 (2021).
Favilla, S., Durante, C., Vigni, M. L. & Cocchi, M. Assessing feature relevance in NPLS models by VIP. Chemom Intell. Lab. Syst. 129, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.05.013 (2013).
Chen, D. et al. Insight into biomass pyrolysis mechanism based on cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin: evolution of volatiles and kinetics, Elucidation of reaction pathways, and characterization of gas, Biochar and bio-oil. Combust. Flame. 242, 112142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112142 (2022).
Pandey, K. K. A study of chemical structure of soft and hardwood and wood polymers by FTIR spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 71, 1969–1975 (1999).
Rambo, M. K. D., Ferreira, M. M. C. & Amorim, E. P. Multi-product calibration models using NIR spectroscopy. Chemom Intell. Lab. Syst. 151, 108–114 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2025-00560264).
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (RS-2025-00560264).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
YK was the primary contributor to this study and drafted the manuscript. CH and HS conducted the preparation and characterization of the biochar samples. SWH led the predictive modeling and data interpretation, while BK was primarily responsible for the chemical analysis. The original concept was jointly developed by SWH and BK. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, Y., Hwang, C., Shin, H. et al. Non-destructive prediction of carbonization indices in biochar derived from underutilized forest biomass using ATR-IR chemometric modeling. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37261-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37261-z
