Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Flow cytometry helps differentiate between mucous membrane pemphigoid and erosive oral lichen planus
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 27 January 2026

Flow cytometry helps differentiate between mucous membrane pemphigoid and erosive oral lichen planus

  • Simone Liguori1,
  • Dario Didona2,
  • Elvira Ruoppo1,
  • Antonia Fiore3,
  • Giulia Scalia3,
  • Michele Davide Mignogna1 &
  • …
  • Stefania Leuci1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 241 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Diseases
  • Immunology
  • Medical research

Abstract

This cross-sectional study investigated the immunophenotype of patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and erosive oral lichen planus (eOLP) evaluating flow cytometry as additional method in differential diagnosis. Thirty patients (18 MMP and 12 eOLP) were recruited. A blood sample was collected from each patient and B and T lymphocytes subsets were characterized through flow cytometry. Disease severity was additionally scored and MMP patients were characterized as high or low-risk based on the extent of mucosal involvement. Any correlation was finally investigated between the immunophenotype and clinical and serological data. High-risk MMP reported higher frequencies of memory cytotoxic T cells (P < 0.01**), memory helper T cells (P < 0.001***), pre-switch and post-switch memory B cells (P < 0.01**) and lower frequencies of naïve cytotoxic T cells (P < 0.01**), naïve helper T cells (P < 0.001***) and naïve B cells (P < 0.05*) compared to low-risk MMP. Additionally, a significant lower frequency of Th1 cells (P < 0.05*) and memory cytotoxic T cells (P < 0.001***) was found in MMP compared to eOLP and both the biomarkers reported high diagnostic accuracy with an AU-ROC value of 0.76 (P < 0.05*) and 0.86 (P < 0.001***), respectively. No differences between the two diseases were reported in B-cell repertoire. T-cell immunophenotyping mirrors the different pathophysiology of MMP and eOLP and could provide a better understanding of the role of cellular immunity in MMP. MMP and eOLP can share similar clinical manifestations and can be challenging to distinguish through the histological and serological tests currently available. Flowcytometric assessment of T-cell subsets could be potentially useful in differentiating between the two diseases.

Similar content being viewed by others

Single cell analysis of diverse immune cell in pneumococcal meningitis

Article Open access 22 May 2025

Bioinformatics analysis of intrinsic drivers of immune dysregulation in multiple myeloma to elucidate immune phenotypes and discover prognostic gene signatures

Article Open access 05 May 2025

Cross center single-cell RNA sequencing study of the immune microenvironment in rapid progressing multiple myeloma

Article Open access 26 January 2023

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Schmidt, E. & Zillikens, D. Pemphigoid diseases. Lancet 381(9863), 320–332 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmidt, E. et al. Cicatricial pemphigoid: IgA and IgG autoantibodies target epitopes on both intra- and extracellular domains of bullous pemphigoid antigen 180. Br. J. Dermatol. 145(5), 778–783 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Oyama, N. et al. Bullous pemphigoid antigen II (BP180) and its soluble extracellular domains are major autoantigens in mucous membrane pemphigoid: the pathogenic relevance to HLA class II alleles and disease severity. Br. J. Dermatol. 154(1), 90–98 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Amber, K., Bloom, R. & Hertl, M. A systematic review with pooled analysis of clinical presentation and immunodiagnostic testing in mucous membrane pemphigoid: association of anti-laminin-332 IgG with oropharyngeal involvement and the usefulness of ELISA. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 30(1), 72–77 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chan, L. S. et al. The first international consensus on mucous membrane pemphigoid: Definition, diagnostic criteria, pathogenic factors, medical treatment, and prognostic indicators. Arch. Dermatol. 138(3), 370–379 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cizenski, J. D. et al. Spectrum of orocutaneous disease associations: Immune-mediated conditions. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 77(5), 795–806 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Du, G., Patzelt, S., Van Beek, N. & Schmidt, E. Mucous membrane pemphigoid. Autoimmun. rev. 21(4), 103036 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Leuci, S., Ruoppo, E., Adamo, D., Calabria, E. & Mignogna, M. D. Oral autoimmune vesicobullous diseases: Classification, clinical presentations, molecular mechanisms, diagnostic algorithms, and management. Periodontology 2000. 80(1), 77–88 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rashid, H. et al. European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology – Part I. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35(9), 1750–1764 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carrozzo, M., Porter, S., Mercadante, V. & Fedele, S. Oral lichen planus: A disease or a spectrum of tissue reactions? Types, causes, diagnostic algorhythms, prognosis, management strategies. Periodontology 2000. 80(1), 105–125 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Alrashdan, M. S., Cirillo, N. & McCullough, M. Oral lichen planus: a literature review and update. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 308(8), 539–551 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Eisen, D., Carrozzo, M., Bagan Sebastian, J. V. & Thongprasom, K. Number V oral lichen planus: clinical features and management. Oral Dis. 11(6), 338–349 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ismail, S. B., Kumar, S. K. S. & Zain, R. B. Oral lichen planus and lichenoid reactions: etiopathogenesis, diagnosis, management and malignant transformation. J. Oral Sci. 49(2), 89–106 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Helander, S. D. & Rogers, R. S. The sensitivity and specificity of direct Immunofluorescence testing in disorders of mucous membranes. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 30(1), 65–75 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Didona, D., Hinterseher, J. & Eming, R. Bullous autoimmune dermatoses of the mucous membranes. Dermatologie. 73(9), 692–700 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Carey, B. & Setterfield, J. Mucous membrane pemphigoid and oral blistering diseases. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 44(7), 732–739 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Combemale, L. et al. Lichen planus pemphigoides with predominant mucous membrane involvement: a series of 12 patients and a literature review. Front. Immunol. 15, 1243566 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Solomon, L. W., Helm, T. N., Stevens, C., Neiders, M. E. & Kumar, V. Clinical and Immunopathologic findings in oral lichen planus pemphigoides. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 103(6), 808–813 (2007).

  19. Barnadas, M. et al. Lichen planus pemphigoides: detection of anti-BP 180 antibodies by ELISA and immunoblotting tests. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 24(11), 1360–1361 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fukuda, A. et al. Four cases of mucous membrane pemphigoid with clinical features of oral lichen planus. Int. J. Dermatol. 55(6), 657–665 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bavarian, R., Sultan, A. S. & Mignogna, M. D. Comments regarding four cases of mucous membrane pemphigoid with clinical features of oral lichen planus and on the utility of immunofluorescence. Int. J. Dermatol. 56(12), 1515–1515 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Carrozzo, M. A reappraisal of diagnostic criteria for mucous membrane pemphigoid. J. Oral Pathol. Med. 38(1), 160 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Setterfield, J. et al. Mucous membrane pemphigoid: a dual circulating antibody response with IgG and IgA signifies a more severe and persistent disease. Br. J. Dermatol. 138(4), 602–610 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shimanovich, I., Nitz, J. M. & Zillikens, D. Multiple and repeated sampling increases the sensitivity of direct immunofluorescence testing for the diagnosis of mucous membrane pemphigoid. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 77(4), 700–705e3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schmidt, E. et al. European guidelines (S3) on diagnosis and management of mucous membrane pemphigoid, initiated by the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology – Part II. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 35(10), 1926–1948 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Carvajal Alegria, G., Gazeau, P., Hillion, S., Daïen, C. I. & Cornec, D. Y. K. Could lymphocyte profiling be useful to diagnose systemic autoimmune diseases? Clin. Rev. Allerg. Immunol. 53(2), 219–236 (2017).

  27. Bergantini, L. et al. Effects of rituximab therapy on B cell differentiation and depletion. Clin. Rheumatol. 39(5), 1415–1421 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Preglej, T. et al. Advanced immunophenotyping: A powerful tool for immune profiling, drug screening, and a personalized treatment approach. Front. Immunol. 14 (2023).

  29. Cheng, Y. S. L., Gould, A., Kurago, Z., Fantasia, J. & Muller, S. Diagnosis of oral lichen planus: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. 122(3), 332–354 (2016).

  30. Escudier, M. et al. A scoring system for mucosal disease severity with special reference to oral lichen planus. Br. J. Dermatol. 157(4), 765–770 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hofmann, S. C. et al. S2k guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of mucous membrane pemphigoid. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 20(11), 1530–1550 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sugerman, P. B. et al. The pathogenesis of oral lichen planus. Crit. Rev. Oral Biol. Med. 13(4), 350–365 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kamaguchi, M. & Iwata, H. The diagnosis and blistering mechanisms of mucous membrane pemphigoid. Front. Immunol. 10, 34 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Scully, C. & Porter, S. R. The clinical spectrum of desquamative gingivitis. Semin Cutan. Med. Surg. 16(4), 308–313 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mignogna, M. D. et al. Lichen planus pemphigoides, a possible example of epitope spreading. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 109(6), 837–843 (2010).

  36. Warnakulasuriya, S. et al. Oral potentially malignant disorders: A consensus report from an international seminar on nomenclature and classification, convened by the WHO Collaborating Centre for Oral Cancer.. Oral Dis.. 27(8), 1862–1880 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. González-Moles, M. Á. et al. Malignant transformation risk of oral lichen planus: A systematic review and comprehensive meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 96, 121–130 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rodríguez-Núñez, I., Blanco-Carrión, A., García, A. G. & Rey, J. G. Peripheral T-cell subsets in patients with reticular and atrophic-erosive oral lichen planus. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontics. 91(2), 180–188 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Charazinska-Carewicz, K., Ganowicz, E., Krol, M. & Gorska, R. Assessment of the peripheral immunocompetent cells in patients with reticular and atrophic-erosive lichen planus. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endodontics. 105(2), 202–205 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, Y., Zhou, J., Fu, S., Wang, C. & Zhou, B. A study of association between oral lichen planus and immune balance of Th1/Th2 cells. Inflammation 38(5), 1874–1879 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schinner, J. et al. Skin-infiltrating T cells display distinct inflammatory signatures in lichen planus, bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus vulgaris. Front. Immunol. 14, 1203776 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Bernauer, W., Wright, P., Dart, J. K., Leonard, J. N. & Lightman, S. The conjunctiva in acute and chronic mucous membrane pemphigoid. An immunohistochemical analysis. Ophthalmology 100(3), 339–346 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Elder, M. J. & Lightman, S. The immunological features and pathophysiology of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid. Eye. 8(Pt 2), 196–199 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Setterfield, J. et al. Mucous membrane pemphigoid: HLA-DQB1*0301 is associated with all clinical sites of involvement and May be linked to antibasement membrane IgG production. Br. J. Dermatol. 145(3), 406–414 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Carrozzo, M. et al. HLA-DQB1 alleles in Italian patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid predominantly affecting the oral cavity. Br. J. Dermatol. 145(5), 805–808 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Black, A. P. B. et al. Rapid effector function of circulating NC16A-specific T cells in individuals with mucous membrane pemphigoid. Br. J. Dermatol. 151(6), 1160–1164 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Canto-Gomes, J. et al. Low memory T cells blood counts and high Naïve regulatory T cells percentage at relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis diagnosis. Front. Immunol. 13, 901165 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Piantoni, S. et al. Effector T-cells are expanded in systemic lupus erythematosus patients with high disease activity and damage indexes. Lupus 27(1), 143–149 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Zou, Y. et al. The pathogenic role of CD4 + tissue-resident memory T cells bearing T follicular helper-like phenotype in pemphigus lesions. J. Invest. Dermatol. 141(9), 2141–2150 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy

    Simone Liguori, Elvira Ruoppo, Michele Davide Mignogna & Stefania Leuci

  2. Rare Skin Diseases Center, Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata-IRCCS, via dei Monti di Creta 104, 00167, Rome, Italy

    Dario Didona

  3. Clinical and Experimental Cytometry Unit, Centre for Advanced Biotechnology Franco Salvatore, CEINGE, via Gaetano Salvatore 486, 80131, Naples, Italy

    Antonia Fiore & Giulia Scalia

Authors
  1. Simone Liguori
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dario Didona
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elvira Ruoppo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Antonia Fiore
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Giulia Scalia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Michele Davide Mignogna
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefania Leuci
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Author contribution: Simone Liguori: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing- Original draft, Dario Didona: Validation, Writing-Review & Editing, Elvira Ruoppo : Investigation, Resources, Antonia Fiore: Investigation, Writing- Original draft, Giulia Scalia: Methodology, Resources, Michele Davide Mignogna: Conceptualization, Supervision, Stefania Leuci: Methodology, Supervision, Writing-Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dario Didona.

Ethics declarations

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was provided by each patient taking part in this study.

Ethics approval

This study was conducted according to the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was obtained by the Ethical Committee of the University of Naples Federico II (protocol number 69/19).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liguori, S., Didona, D., Ruoppo, E. et al. Flow cytometry helps differentiate between mucous membrane pemphigoid and erosive oral lichen planus. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37339-8

Download citation

  • Received: 19 November 2025

  • Accepted: 21 January 2026

  • Published: 27 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37339-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Mucous membrane pemphigoid
  • Oral lichen planus
  • Flow cytometry
  • Immunophenotype
  • Differential diagnosis
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research