Table 1 Summary of research gaps.
References | Routing | Technique used | Findings | Research gaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Priority-based congestion-avoidance routing | Type-2 fuzzy | Network throughput, traffic load | High network overhead due to congestion | |
SENET | World competitive contests (WCC) | Energy consumption | Grounds massive package losses, and serious packets are released | |
CoSMP | AES-CFMAC and ECDSA | Link failure probability delay | Not suitable for high density nodes which causes data transfer delay | |
EHCRP | Generative SVM | Network lifetime, throughput | Affected by network congestion which limits the energy efficiency | |
i-MAC | Modified superframe structure | Latency and power consumption | They not consider the load balancing in the network | |
Secure cross-domain access control scheme | RSA and ECC | Computation cost, routing overhead | Complex design due to mathematical process of ECC | |
ECDSMR | ECC and ECDSMR | Network lifetime, throughput | Continued to be unable to withstand the harmful elements, resulting in a significant rate of data loss | |
EEAWuR-MAC protocol | Genetic optimal algorithm | Delay and energy consumption | The issue of network overhead remains unresolved | |
B-DEAH | PRESENT and MOORA | Network throughput, packet loss rate | Scalability is limited, and additional delay occurs due to dual verification in the blockchain | |
Energy aware clustering scheme | CSO | Throughput and propagation delay | Applicable only to specific applications and unsuitable for real-time scenarios |