Table 4 Results comparison of proposed and existing routing schemes with varying number of mobile nodes.

From: Optimal cluster-based energy efficient routing scheme for QoS aware IoT-enabled wireless body area network

Routing schemes

Number of mobile nodes

10

20

30

40

50

10

20

30

40

50

 

Energy consumption (mW)

Packet delivery ratio (%)

T-MAC45

3.488

3.816

4.240

4.276

4.398

86.932

84.811

80.701

79.100

75.923

MS-MAC46

2.925

3.253

3.677

3.713

3.835

89.288

87.167

83.057

81.456

78.279

MT-MAC47

2.361

2.689

3.113

3.149

3.271

91.644

89.523

85.413

83.812

80.635

DT-MAC41

1.798

2.126

2.550

2.586

2.708

94.000

91.879

87.769

86.168

82.991

QEEC-Routing

1.235

1.563

1.987

2.023

2.145

96.356

94.235

90.125

88.524

85.347

 

Network lifetime (%)

Throughput (Mbps)

T-MAC45

81.228

79.707

77.604

74.459

72.819

4122

4012

3957

3756

3412

MS-MAC46

85.360

83.839

81.736

78.591

76.951

4500

4419

4108

3975

3745

MT-MAC47

89.492

87.971

85.868

82.723

81.083

4852

4610

4414

4198

3989

DT-MAC41

93.624

92.103

90.000

86.855

85.215

5125

5089

4856

4657

4025

QEEC-Routing

97.756

96.235

94.132

90.987

89.347

5426

5128

4987

4752

4610

 

Latency (s)

Routing overhead (%)

T-MAC45

6.574

7.210

7.326

7.376

7.492

18.483

18.816

19.260

19.494

19.880

MS-MAC46

5.518

6.154

6.270

6.320

6.436

14.921

15.254

15.698

15.932

16.318

MT-MAC47

4.462

5.098

5.214

5.264

5.380

11.359

11.692

12.136

12.370

12.756

DT-MAC41

3.406

4.042

4.158

4.208

4.324

7.797

8.130

8.574

8.808

9.194

QEEC-Routing

2.350

2.986

3.102

3.152

3.268

4.235

4.568

5.012

5.246

5.632

Back to article page