Table 6 Performance comparison of proposed and existing routing scheme for high density nodes.
Routing schemes | 1000 | 2000 | 3000 | 4000 | 5000 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Packet delivery ratio (%) | ||||
T-MAC | 75.856 | 72.052 | 70.126 | 68.525 | 65.345 |
MS-MAC | 81.058 | 78.564 | 75.089 | 71.248 | 68.547 |
MT-MAC | 83.152 | 80.125 | 75.418 | 72.348 | 70.008 |
DT-MAC | 85.525 | 83.125 | 80.958 | 78.545 | 72.314 |
QEEC-Routing | 93.235 | 92.052 | 90.258 | 89.655 | 88.512 |
| Â | Network lifetime (%) | ||||
T-MAC | 75.790 | 69.917 | 67.823 | 63.262 | 59.225 |
MS-MAC | 79.290 | 74.611 | 72.652 | 68.893 | 65.245 |
MT-MAC | 83.124 | 80.178 | 78.465 | 75.285 | 72.285 |
DT-MAC | 85.625 | 82.253 | 80.345 | 78.635 | 75.245 |
QEEC-Routing | 90.125 | 89.566 | 88.124 | 86.548 | 84.325 |
