Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Spatial distribution and risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl compounds from open incineration of used medical disposable face masks
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 29 January 2026

Spatial distribution and risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl compounds from open incineration of used medical disposable face masks

  • Olusola Adedayo Adesina1,
  • Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran2,
  • Ebenezer O. Ige3,
  • Amr S. Abouzied4,
  • Roaa A. Tayeb5,
  • Ibtehaj F. Alshdoukhi6 &
  • …
  • Jamelah S. Al-Otaibi7 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Environmental sciences
  • Risk factors

Abstract

The handling of used medical face mask waste is of great environmental concern, particularly in the developing African countries. A common technique for disposing of these materials is through open burning; however, this approach raises issues of air pollution. Hence, this study determined the concentration of polychlorinated biphenyl compounds (PCBs) from the open burning of different disposable medical facemask materials. A health risk assessment was conducted to evaluate the potential health risks associated with human inhalation of emissions from the open burning of these materials, using various health risk indicators. The concentration distribution around the open incineration site was also modeled. Waste facemasks were combusted in the open reactor, and the emissions were sampled for PCBs using a filter-sorbent system. PCB analysis was done using GC-MS. Incremental Life Cancer Risk (ILCR), Inhalation Risk Assessment (IRA), and Hazard Quotient (HQ) were calculated to assess health risk. The results showed the Ʃ PCBs from different face mask materials range from 253.21 to 733.81 µg/m3, WHO-recommended surgical facemasks, and N95 Facemasks emit the highest concentration of PCBs. Daily inhalation exposure values for children range from 0.0037 to 0.012 µg TEQ kg− 1 day− 1 while IRA for adults ranges from 0.0016 to 0.0056 µg TEQ kg− 1 day− 1. Most of the ILCR values obtained are higher than the WHO stipulated permissible limits, which indicate possible cancer risk from inhalation of the emission. Also, HQ values obtained are greater than 1, indicating associated noncarcinogenic risks. The dispersion model of Dioxin-like PCBs from the burning source of the facemask depicts the presence of considerable PCB concentrations within a 3 km perimeter of the burning site after one year. The study concluded that proper disposal methods should be implemented for the management of medical face masks, especially in developing countries in Africa.

Similar content being viewed by others

Characterization and health risk assessment of chemical and microbial pollutants in particulate matter from dust prone regions

Article Open access 02 July 2025

Composition, interactions and resulting inhalation risk of micro- and nano-plastics in urban air

Article Open access 01 December 2025

Expected health risk out of black carbon and particulate matter in the indoor environment of an industrial cluster of chandigarh in India

Article Open access 02 July 2025

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article **.**.

References

  1. Harapan, H. et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review. J. Infect. Public. Health. 13, 667–673 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Nicola, M. et al. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): a review. Int. J. Surg. 78, 185–193 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adesina, O. A. et al. Characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon from open burning of disposable COVID-19 facemask: Spatial distribution and risk assessment. Arab. J. Chem. 17, 105721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105721 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. https://covid19.who.int/.( (2022).

  5. Wang, L. et al. Global face mask pollution: threats to the environment and wildlife, and potential solutions. Sci. Total Environ. 887, 164055 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lyu, L. et al. Towards environmentally sustainable management: A review on the generation, degradation, and recycling of polypropylene face mask waste. J. Hazard. Mater. 461, 132566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132566 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Benson, N. U. et al. COVID-19 pandemic and emerging plastic-based personal protective equipment waste pollution and management in Africa. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 105222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105222 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boyle, L. Bird dies after getting tangled in coronavirus face mask. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/coronavirus-face-mask-bird-death-recycle-environment-conservation-a9475341.html (2020).

  9. Patrício Silva, A. L. et al. Risks of Covid-19 face masks to wildlife: present and future research needs. Sci. Total Environ. 792, 148505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148505 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Patrício Silva, A. L. et al. Rethinking and optimizing plastic waste management under COVID-19 pandemic. Sci. Total Environ. 742, 140565 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Selvaranjan, K. et al. Environmental challenges induced by extensive use of face masks during COVID-19: a review and potential solutions. Environ. Challenges. 3, 100039 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Adesina, O. A. Concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls in ambient air and solid residues around a municipal solid waste open burning site. Chem. Pap. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-021-01541-x (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adesina, O. A., Adesina, A. O. & Adeniran Level of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon emission in the ambient air and residual Ash from a typical municipal solid waste open burning site in Nigeria. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy. 2, 105–111 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kitamura, H. et al. Impact of secondary generated minerals on toxic element immobilization for air pollution control fly Ash of a municipal solid waste incinerator. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 25, 20700–20712 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Makarichi, L., Jutidamrongphan, W. & Techato, K. The evolution of waste-to-energy incineration: a review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 91, 812–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.04.088 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou, Q. et al. Toxicological risk by inhalation exposure of air pollution emitted from china’s municipal solid waste incineration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52, 11490–11499 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Silva, R. V. et al. Environmental impacts of the use of bottom ashes from municipal solid waste incineration: a review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl.. 140, 23–35 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wang, P., Hu, Y. & Cheng, H. Municipal solid waste incineration fly Ash as an important source of heavy metal pollution in China. Environ. Pollut.. 252, 461–475 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nanda, S. & Berruti, F. Municipal solid waste management and landfilling technologies: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 1433–1456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01100-y (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Idowu, G. A. & Olonimoyo, E. A. How has COVID-19 medical face mask altered the dynamics of pollutants from incinerated wastes? J. Hazard. Mater. Adv. 11, 100351 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sadanoski, M. A. et al. Bioprocess conditions for treating mineral transformer oils contaminated with PCBs. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 8, 104068 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gherdaoui, C. E. et al. Exploring organo-bentonite adsorption properties for biphenyl removal from organic-aqueous media: kinetic study and industrial perspective. Braz J. Dev. 9, 29886–29910. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv9n11-039 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Klocke, C. & Lein, P. J. Evidence implicating non-dioxin-like congeners as the key mediators of PCB developmental neurotoxicity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21031013 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Klocke, C., Sethi, S. & Lein, P. J. The developmental neurotoxicity of legacy vs. contemporary pcbs: similarities and differences. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 27, 8885–8896 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pessah, I. N. et al. Neurotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and related organohalogens. Acta Neuropathol. 138, 363–387 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Adesina, O. A. et al. Spatiotemporal distributions of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons close to a typical medical waste incinerator. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 25, 274–282 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eze, V. C. et al. Source apportionment of polychlorinated biphenyls in surface water and sediments from river Otamiri, Imo state. Sci. Afr. 22, e01957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01957 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van den Berg, M. & Linda, S. B. The 2005 WHO re-evaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for Dioxins and dioxin-like compounds. Toxicol. Sci. 93, 223–241 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  29. DeVito, M. J. et al. The 2022 world health organization Reevaluation of human and mammalian toxic equivalency factors for polychlorinated dioxins, dibenzofurans and biphenyls. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 146, 105525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105525 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Francisco, A. P. et al. Spatial and seasonal trends of polychlorinated dioxins, furans and dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in air and inhalation risk assessment. Atmos. Pollut Res. 8, 979–987. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2017.03.007 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). IRIS toxicological review of polychlorinated biphenyls. https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris_drafts/recordisplay.cfm?deid=309645. (2015).

  32. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Risk assessment guidance for superfund. Human health evaluation manual (Part A). Washington, DC. (1989).

  33. Adepoju, T. T. et al. Estimation of gaseous criteria air pollutants from road transport system in Lagos metropolis of Nigeria. Environ. Qual. Manag. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/tqem.21552 (2018).

  34. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Public health assessment guidance manual (2005 Update): Appendix F. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/hac/phama (2005).

  35. Aganbi, E., Iwegbue, C. M. A. & Martincigh, B. S. Concentrations and risks of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in transformer oils and the environment of a power plant in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Toxicol. Rep. 6, 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.08.008 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  36. World Health Organization (WHO). Assessment of the Health Risk of Dioxins: re-evaluation of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) (WHO, 1998).

  37. Tongo, I., Ogbeide, O. & Ezemonye, L. Human health risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in smoked fish species from markets in Southern Nigeria. Toxicol. Rep. 4, 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2016.12.006 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R13), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

This study was funded by Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2026R13), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, Afe Babalola University, Ado- Ekiti, Nigeria

    Olusola Adedayo Adesina

  2. Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara, Nigeria

    Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, United States

    Ebenezer O. Ige

  4. Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, 81442, Saudi Arabia

    Amr S. Abouzied

  5. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Roaa A. Tayeb

  6. Department of Basic Sciences, College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Science, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

    Ibtehaj F. Alshdoukhi

  7. Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia

    Jamelah S. Al-Otaibi

Authors
  1. Olusola Adedayo Adesina
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamiu Adetayo Adeniran
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ebenezer O. Ige
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amr S. Abouzied
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Roaa A. Tayeb
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Ibtehaj F. Alshdoukhi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jamelah S. Al-Otaibi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

“O.A.A, A.J.A and O.I. wrote the main manuscript text and A.S.A, R.A.T prepared figures, I.E.A, J.S.A. proof read the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olusola Adedayo Adesina.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adesina, O.A., Adeniran, J.A., Ige, E. et al. Spatial distribution and risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyl compounds from open incineration of used medical disposable face masks. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37397-y

Download citation

  • Received: 04 September 2025

  • Accepted: 21 January 2026

  • Published: 29 January 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37397-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Face mask
  • PCBs
  • Risk assessment
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing