Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Microbial signatures define the ecosystem functions of the pelagic microbiome in a basin-scale, Southwest Atlantic Ocean
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 22 April 2026

Microbial signatures define the ecosystem functions of the pelagic microbiome in a basin-scale, Southwest Atlantic Ocean

  • Natascha Menezes Bergo1 na1,
  • Francielli Vilela Peres1 na1,
  • Danilo Candido Vieira1,
  • Flúvio Modolon1,
  • Julio Cezar Fornazier Moreira1,
  • Rebeca Graciela Matheus Lizárraga1,
  • Renato Gamba Romano1,
  • Amanda Goncalves Bendia1,
  • Leandro Nascimento Lemos2,5,
  • Alice de Moura Emilio1,
  • Augusto Miliorini Amendola1,
  • Diana Carolina Duque Castano1,
  • Mateus Gustavo Chuqui1,
  • Fabiana S. Paula1,
  • William Soares Gattaz Brandão1,
  • Gustavo Fonseca3,
  • Ana Tereza R. Vasconcelos5,
  • Célio Roberto Jonck4,
  • Daniel Leite Moreira4,
  • Frederico Pereira Brandini1 &
  • …
  • Vivian Helena Pellizari1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 838 Accesses

  • 1 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Marine biology
  • Metagenomics
  • Microbial ecology
  • Water microbiology

Abstract

The pelagic environment represents a mosaic of biogeographical domains shaped by regional oceanographic processes. Here, a coastal-to-open ocean microbiome investigation was conducted from 64 water samples of the Santos Basin (SB), located in the subtropical South Atlantic Ocean. We combined shotgun metagenomics with a hybrid machine learning workflow to investigate the taxonomic diversity, community structure, and ecosystem functions of pelagic microbiomes. The workflow integrated self-organizing maps (unsupervised) for pattern discovery and Random Forest (supervised) for predictive modeling. Unsupervised machine learning revealed a clear spatial and vertical (light-driven) distribution, with indicator taxa reflecting biogeochemical patterns consistent with global surveys. Supervised learning identified phosphate, salinity, and nitrate, influenced by local upwelling and La Plata River plume, as the primary environmental drivers of microbial community structure. In terms of functionality, the SB microbiome displayed depth- and region-specific patterns: photoautotrophs and nitrogen fixers dominated photic waters (with differences between coastal and oceanic stations), whereas chemolithoautotrophs and mixotrophs prevailed in the aphotic zone. Notably, nitrification signatures were more frequent in northern mesopelagic communities, while sulfur-oxidation pathways were enriched toward the south. Genes for CO bio-oxidation and dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) degradation were present across all depths. Furthermore, potential non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs were detected in the deep waters, underscoring previous underappreciated to nitrogen cycling. Our findings indicated that the Santos Basin hosts a functionally diverse microbiome including putative novel lineages. The taxonomic and functional patterns observed in the SB might provide insights into potential ecological responses to shifts in nutrient dynamics and physical processes. This investigation provides an ecogenomic baseline for understanding the microbial ecosystem services in subtropical oceans and reveals the potential of machine learning to uncover ecological patterns in underexplored marine regions.

Similar content being viewed by others

O2 partitioning of sulfur oxidizing bacteria drives acidity and thiosulfate distributions in mining waters

Article Open access 10 April 2023

Seasonal recurrence and modular assembly of an Arctic pelagic marine microbiome

Article Open access 03 February 2025

Physical controls on heterogeneous mesopelagic biogeochemistry

Article Open access 06 February 2026

Data availability

The sequencing reads dataset generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the National Centre for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) repositor under the BioProject PRJNA1191028. The genomic dataset generated during and analyzed during the current study are available in the Figshare repositor under https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30043690. The iMESc and iMESc Savepoints used for the machine learning analyses are available at Github via https://github.com/DaniloCVieira/imesc_savepoints/tree/2c5a4441ad447c71cc8f5d3e11811fb5a76a3427/Bergo_2025/Microbial-signatures-define-the-ecosystem-functions-of-the-pelagic-microbiome-in-a-basin-scale-Southwest-Atlantic-Ocean

References

  1. Stal, L. J. A Sea of Microbes: What’s So Special about Marine Microbiology. In The Marine Microbiome (eds Stal, L. J. & Cretoiu, M. S.) 1–44 (Springer, 2022).

  2. Jiao, N. et al. The microbial carbon pump and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 408–419 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, W. K. W. Primary production of prochlorophytes, cyanobacteria, and eucaryotic ultraphytoplankton: measurements from flow cytometric sorting. Limnol. Oceanogr. 39, 169–175 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jardillier, L. et al. Significant CO₂ fixation by small prymnesiophytes in the subtropical and tropical northeast Atlantic Ocean. ISME J. 4, 1180–1192 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Worden, A. Z. et al. Rethinking the marine carbon cycle: factoring in the multifarious lifestyles of microbes. Science 347, 1257594 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchan, A., LeCleir, G. R., Gulvik, C. A. & González, J. M. Master recyclers: features and functions of bacteria associated with phytoplankton blooms. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 12, 686–698 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Baltar, F. & Gerhard, J. H. Ideas and perspectives: is dark carbon fixation relevant for oceanic primary production estimates?. Biogeosciences 16, 3793–3799 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Falkowski, P. G., Fenchel, T. & Delong, E. F. The microbial engines that drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. Science 320, 1034–1039 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sunagawa, S. et al. Structure and function of the global ocean microbiome. Science 348, 1261359 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tully, B. J., Graham, E. D. & Heidelberg, J. F. The reconstruction of 2,631 draft metagenome-assembled genomes from the global oceans. Sci. Data 5, 170203 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoshitake, K. et al. Development of a time-series shotgun metagenomics database for monitoring microbial communities at the Pacific coast of Japan. Sci. Rep. 11, 12222 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Acinas, S. G. et al. Deep ocean metagenomes provide insight into the metabolic architecture of bathypelagic microbial communities. Nat. Commun. 12, 604 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Junger, P. C. et al. Global biogeography of the smallest plankton across ocean depths. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg9763 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sánchez, P. et al. Marine picoplankton metagenomes and MAGs from eleven vertical profiles obtained by the Malaspina Expedition. Sci. Data 11, 154 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alves, J. N. et al. Microbial community diversity and physical–chemical features of the Southwestern Atlantic Ocean. Arch. Microbiol. 197, 165–179 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coutinho, F. H. et al. Ecogenomics and metabolic potential of the South Atlantic Ocean microbiome. Sci. Total Environ. 765, 142758 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bergo, N. M., Signori, C. N., Amado, A. M., Brandini, F. P. & Pellizari, V. H. The partitioning of carbon biomass among the pico- and nano-plankton community in the South Brazilian Bight during a strong summer intrusion of South Atlantic central water. Front. Mar. Sci. 4, 238 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ribeiro, C. G. et al. Pico and nanoplankton abundance and carbon stocks along the Brazilian Bight. PeerJ 4, e2587 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro, C. G. et al. Estimating microbial populations by flow cytometry: Comparison between instruments. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods 14, 750–758 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Agostini, L. et al. Deep-sea plastisphere: long-term colonization by plastic-associated bacterial and archaeal communities in the Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Sci. Total Environ. 793, 148335 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ferreira, J. C. N. et al. Abundance and microbial diversity from surface to deep water layers over the Rio Grande Rise. South Atlantic. Prog. Oceanogr. 201, 102736 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moreira, J. C. F. et al. A Machine learning approach elucidates spatial patterns of environmental properties driving microbial composition over Santos Basin. South Atlantic bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.26.640418 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moreira, D. L. et al. Multidisciplinary scientific cruises for environmental characterization in the Santos Basin – methods and sampling design. Ocean Coast. Res. 71, e23022 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Corrêa, A. M. S. et al. Hydrocarbon composition of oils spilt on the Brazilian coast in 2019 and 2022. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 207, 116821 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sartori, É. et al. Trace metal concentration along the Brazilian coast: An assessment of the influence of the Doce River plume. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 188, 114640 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Senez-Mello, T. M. et al. Assessment of anthropogenic pollution in Guanabara Bay (SE Brazil) through biogeochemical data and stable isotope mixing models. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31, 32972–32997 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ramírez, F. et al. Overfishing species on the move may burden seafood provision in the low-latitude Atlantic Ocean. Sci. Total Environ. 836, 155480 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Franco, B. C. et al. Climate change impacts on the atmospheric circulation, ocean, and fisheries in the southwest South Atlantic Ocean: a review. Clim. Change 162, 2359–2377 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tara Ocean Foundation et al. Priorities for ocean microbiome research. Nat. Microbiol. 7, 937–947 (2022).

  30. Asnicar, F., Thomas, A. M., Passerini, A., Waldron, L. & Segata, N. Machine learning for microbiologists. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 22, 191–205 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Prabhu, A. et al. Machine learning and metagenomics identifies uncharacterized taxa inferred to drive biogeochemical cycles in a subtropical hypereutrophic estuary. ISME Commun. 4, 067 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pinnaka, A. K. & Tanuku, N. R. S. Marine microbial diversity for sustainable development. In Microbial Diversity in Ecosystem Sustainability and Biotechnological Applications (eds Gupta, J. et al.) 117–158

  33. Bowers, et al. Minimum information about a single amplified genome (MISAG) and a metagenome-assembled genome (MIMAG) of bacteria and archaea. Nat Biotechnol. 35, 725–731 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sunagawa, S. et al. Tara Oceans: towards global ocean ecosystems biology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 428–445 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Arístegui, J., Gasol, J. M., Duarte, C. M. & Herndl, G. J. Microbial oceanography of the dark ocean’s pelagic realm. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 1501–1529 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Duarte, 2015 – Malaspina

  37. Zhang, Z. et al. Global biogeography of microbes driving ocean ecological status under climate change. Nat. Commun. 15, 4657 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brandini, F. P., Turra, P. M. & Santos, P. P. G. M. Ecosystem responses to biogeochemical fronts in the South Brazil Bight. Prog. Oceanogr. 164, 52–62 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Xu, X. et al. (2024) Genome-based taxonomic classification of the genus Sulfitobacter along with the proposal of a new genus Parasulfitobacter gen. nov. and exploring the gene clusters associated with sulfur oxidation. BMC Genomics 25: 389.

  40. Moran, M. A., González, J. M. & Kiene, R. P. Linking a bacterial taxon to sulfur cycling in the sea: studies of the marine Roseobacter group. Geomicrobiol. J. 20, 375–388 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Zeng, Y.-X. et al. Diversity of bacterial dimethylsulfoniopropionate degradation genes in surface seawater of Arctic Kongsfjorden. Sci. Rep. 6, 33031 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sanz-Sáez, I. et al. Top abundant deep ocean heterotrophic bacteria can be retrieved by cultivation. ISME Commun. 3, 92 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lappan, R. et al. Molecular hydrogen in seawater supports growth of diverse marine bacteria. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 581–595 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dede, B. et al. Bacterial chemolithoautotrophy in ultramafic plumes along the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. ISME J. 18, wrae165 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Giebel, H. A. et al. Complementary energy acquisition via aerobic anoxygenic photosynthesis and carbon monoxide oxidation by Planktomarina temperata of the Roseobacter group. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 95. fiz050. (2019)

  46. Cai, H. et al. Aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs play important roles in nutrient cycling within cyanobacterial Microcystisbloom microbiomes. Microbiome 12, 88 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Luo, H. & Moran, M. A. Evolutionary ecology of the marine Roseobacter clade. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 78, 573–587 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Danovaro, R., Snelgrove, P. V. R. & Tyler, P. Challenging the paradigms of deep-sea ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 465–475 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xue, C.-X. et al. Insights into the vertical stratification of microbial ecological roles across the deepest seawater column on Earth. Microorganisms 8, 1309 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Li, J. et al. (2024) Arcobacteraceae are ubiquitous mixotrophic bacteria playing important roles in carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling in global oceans. mSystems 9: 00513–24.

  51. Stoecker, D. K. et al. Mixotrophy in the marine plankton. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 9, 311–335 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ward, B. A. & Follows, M. J. Marine mixotrophy increases trophic transfer efficiency, mean organism size, and vertical carbon flux. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 2958–2963 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Swan, B. K. et al. Potential for chemolithoautotrophy among ubiquitous bacteria lineages in the dark ocean. Science 333, 1296–1300 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Baltar, F. et al. A ubiquitous gammaproteobacterial clade dominates expression of sulfur oxidation genes across the mesopelagic ocean. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 1137–1148 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Teira, E. et al. Distribution and activity of Bacteria and Archaea in the deep water masses of the North Atlantic. Limnol. Oceanogr. 51, 2131–2144 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Alonso-Sáez, L. et al. High bicarbonate assimilation in the dark by Arctic bacteria. ISME J. 4, 1581–1590 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  57. La Cono, V. et al. Contribution of bicarbonate assimilation to carbon pool dynamics in the deep mediterranean sea and cultivation of actively nitrifying and CO₂-fixing bathypelagic prokaryotic consortia. Front. Microbiol. 9, 3 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zhou, Z., Tran, P. Q., Kieft, K. & Anantharaman, K. Genome diversification in globally distributed novel marine Proteobacteria is linked to environmental adaptation. ISME J. 14, 2060–2077 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Chakraborty, S., Andersen, K. H., Merico, A. & Riemann, L. Particle-associated N2 fixation by heterotrophic bacteria in the global ocean. Sci. Adv. 11(8), 4693 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yuan, J., Lai, Q., Zheng, T. & Shao, Z. Novosphingobium indicum sp. nov., a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from a deep-sea environment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 59, 2084–2088 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Acids Res. 44, D590-D594 (2016).

  62. Wood, D. E. & Salzberg, S. L. Kraken: ultrafast metagenomic sequence classification using exact alignments. Genome Biol. 15, R46 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wood, D. E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol. 20, 257 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Wilke, A. et al. The MG-RAST metagenomics database and portal in 2015. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D590–D594 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Keegan, K. P., Glass, E. M. & Meyer, F. MG-RAST, a metagenomics service for analysis of microbial community structure and function. In Microbial Environmental Genomics (MEG) 207–233.

  66. McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8, e61217 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Wickham, H. ggplot2. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 3, 180–185 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  68. Oksanen, J. et al. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.9 (2013).

  69. Fonseca, G. & Vieira, D. C. Overcoming the challenges of data integration in ecosystem studies with machine learning workflows: an example from the Santos project. Ocean Coast. Res. 71, e23021 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Vieira, D. C. et al. iMESc - an interactive machine learning app for environmental sciences. Front. Environ. Sci. 13, 1533292 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  71. Kohonen, T. The self-organizing map. Proc. IEEE 78, 1464–1480 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  72. Vesanto, J. & Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 11, 586–600 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Debeljak, P. et al. Seasonal patterns in microbial carbon and iron transporter expression in the Southern Ocean. Microbiome 11, 187 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wu, Z. et al. Metagenomic insights into microbial adaptation to the salinity gradient of a typical short residence-time estuary. Microbiome 12, 115 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Li, D. et al. MEGAHIT v1. 0: a fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102, 3–11 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Eren, A. M. et al. Anvi’o: an advanced analysis and visualization platform for ’omics data. PeerJ 3, e1319 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Finn, R. D., Clements, J. & Eddy, S. R. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, W29–W37 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Galperin, M. Y., Makarova, K. S., Wolf, Y. I. & Koonin, E. V. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D261–D269 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Alneberg, J. et al. CONCOCT: clustering contigs on coverage and composition. arXiv preprint https://abs/arXiv.org/1312.4038 (2013).

  82. Eren, A. M. et al. Community-led, integrated, reproducible multi-omics with anvi’o. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 3–6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Parks, D. H. et al. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Chaumeil, P.-A., Mussig, A. J., Hugenholtz, P. & Parks, D. H. GTDB-Tk: a toolkit to classify genomes with the Genome Taxonomy Database. Bioinformatics 36, 1925–1927 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  86. Yu, X. et al. SCycDB: a curated functional gene database for metagenomic profiling of sulphur cycling pathways. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 21, 924–940 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to PETROBRAS for the PCR-BS project planning and management. We would like to thank Daniel Moreira for coordinating the PCR-BS project and Dr. Frederico Pereira Brandini for coordinating the “Pelagic realm project”. We would like to thank members of the LECOM team for their scientific support on board. We are deeply grateful for the invaluable guidance and support provided by Rosa Carvalho Gamba, your legacy wisdom continues to inspire us even in her absence. A special thanks to the following PCR-BS project’s researchers and their institutions: UFRJ, UFF, PUC-Rio, UERJ, FIRJAN/SENAI, SALT, INPE, USP, UNIFESP, UFPR, UNESP, IP-SP, FURG and Socioambiental. To the University of São Paulo Foundation (FUSP) for financial administrative management. We also thank the RV Ocean Stalwart and RV Seward Johnson crew, and OceanPact for the scientific expeditions. We thank Barbara Resende Silva for providing valuable support in designing the conceptual diagram. We thank Alexandra Lehmkuhl Gerber and Ana Paula C. Guimarães from UGCDFA/LNCC for sequencing the samples. We acknowledge the anonymous reviewers’ valuable comments that helped to improve this manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (PETROBRAS), through the RD&I investments clauses of Brazilian National Agency of Petroleum, Natural Gas, and Biofuels (ANP), under grant numbers 5850.0109317.18.9 and 21167–2, respectively. The project “Caracterização química e biológica do sistema pelágico da Bacia de Santos/PCR-BS” is a national collaboration between PETROBRAS and Universidade de São Paulo. NMB and LNL was financed by a Pos Postdoctoral ‘s fellowship from the PETROBRAS. ATRV is supported by FAPERJ (E-26/201.046/2022) and CNPq (307145/2021–2).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Natascha Menezes Bergo and Francielli Vilela Peres contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oceanographic Institute, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Natascha Menezes Bergo, Francielli Vilela Peres, Danilo Candido Vieira, Flúvio Modolon, Julio Cezar Fornazier Moreira, Rebeca Graciela Matheus Lizárraga, Renato Gamba Romano, Amanda Goncalves Bendia, Alice de Moura Emilio, Augusto Miliorini Amendola, Diana Carolina Duque Castano, Mateus Gustavo Chuqui, Fabiana S. Paula, William Soares Gattaz Brandão, Frederico Pereira Brandini & Vivian Helena Pellizari

  2. Ilum-School of Science, Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials, Campinas, Brazil

    Leandro Nascimento Lemos

  3. Instituto Do Mar, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Gustavo Fonseca

  4. PETROBRAS Research Center, Centro de Pesquisas Leopoldo Américo Miguez de Mello (PETROBRAS/CENPES), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

    Célio Roberto Jonck & Daniel Leite Moreira

  5. National Laboratory for Scientific Computing, Petrópolis, Brazil

    Leandro Nascimento Lemos & Ana Tereza R. Vasconcelos

Authors
  1. Natascha Menezes Bergo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Francielli Vilela Peres
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Danilo Candido Vieira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Flúvio Modolon
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Julio Cezar Fornazier Moreira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rebeca Graciela Matheus Lizárraga
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Renato Gamba Romano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Amanda Goncalves Bendia
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Leandro Nascimento Lemos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Alice de Moura Emilio
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Augusto Miliorini Amendola
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Diana Carolina Duque Castano
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Mateus Gustavo Chuqui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Fabiana S. Paula
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  15. William Soares Gattaz Brandão
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Gustavo Fonseca
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  17. Ana Tereza R. Vasconcelos
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  18. Célio Roberto Jonck
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  19. Daniel Leite Moreira
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  20. Frederico Pereira Brandini
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  21. Vivian Helena Pellizari
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

N.M.B., V.H.P., D.L.M. and C.R.J. conceived and designed the study. J.C.F.M., A.M.A., A.M.E., R.G.R., D.C.D.C., F.S.P. and W.S.G.B. was responsible for onboard sampling and extracting DNA from water samples. M.G.C and F.P.B. was responsible for onboard sampling and generating environmental dataset. A.T.R.V. was responsible for generating the sequencing dataset. N.M.B., L.N.L., F.V.P., R.G.M.L., D.C.V. and F.M. carried out the bioinformatics and statistical analysis. N.M.B., R.G.R., and F.V.P., performed analysis of genomic data. D.C.V. and N.M.B. performed oceanographic analyses; N.M.B., F.V.P., D.C.V. and F.M. prepared the figures and tables and wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A.G.B. and G.F. provided helpful discussions and technical help. All authors discussed the results, commented, and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natascha Menezes Bergo.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Consent for publication

All authors have read and approved the paper for submission.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information 1. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 2. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 3. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 4. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 5. (download XLSX )

Supplementary Information 6. (download PDF )

Supplementary Information 7. (download XLSX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bergo, N.M., Peres, F.V., Vieira, D.C. et al. Microbial signatures define the ecosystem functions of the pelagic microbiome in a basin-scale, Southwest Atlantic Ocean. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37419-9

Download citation

  • Received: 04 June 2025

  • Accepted: 21 January 2026

  • Published: 22 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37419-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing