Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Directing coral larval settlement in coral aquaculture for reef restoration
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 February 2026

Directing coral larval settlement in coral aquaculture for reef restoration

  • Nico D. Briggs1,
  • Andrew P. Negri1,2,
  • Elsa Antunes3,
  • Matthew Drane3,
  • Andrea Severati1 &
  • …
  • Florita Flores1,2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biological techniques
  • Biotechnology
  • Ecology
  • Microbiology
  • Ocean sciences

Abstract

Optimising coral early life stages, particularly larval settlement, remains a challenge for coral aquaculture. Settlement typically relies on biologically conditioned substrates, such as crustose coralline algae (CCA) or microbial films, which are difficult to scale for mass-production. To overcome this bottleneck, we evaluated chemical and physical alternatives that enable spatial control of directing larval settlement. Larval responses from 14 coral species were tested against known and potential chemical inducers, including neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Next, we investigated the efficacy of a set of known chemical inducers and microtopography to direct larval settlement. The neuropeptide Hym-248 was the most effective, inducing settlement in seven acroporid species. Embedding soluble inducers (CCA extract and Hym-248) in agar hydrogels within ceramic cubes successfully induced and directed settlement of Acropora kenti. Similarly, CCA-conditioned ceramic protrusions, with and without microtopographic pores, achieved > 99% settlement on or adjacent to protrusions. These findings demonstrate that immobilised chemical cues can precisely localise larval settlement on unconditioned substrates and that conditioning only small, discrete 3-D printed features is as effective as conditioning entire tiles. This approach substantially reduces aquarium space and resource requirements, offering a scalable, cost-effective pathway to enhance the efficiency of sexually propagated coral aquaculture in reef restoration.

Data availability

All data are freely available and housed in the AIMS data repository: https://tsv-apps.aims.gov.au/metadata/view/383f7436-645b-43b0-9721-dc9172f32463.

References

  1. Eddy, T. D. et al. Global decline in capacity of coral reefs to provide ecosystem services. One Earth 4, 1278–1285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.08.016 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fabricius, K. E. et al. The seven sins of climate change: A review of rates of change, and quantitative impacts on ecosystems and water quality in the Great Barrier Reef. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 219, 118267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118267 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zaneveld, J. R. et al. Overfishing and nutrient pollution interact with temperature to disrupt coral reefs down to microbial scales. Nat. Commun. 7, 11833. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11833 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Souter, D. et al. Status of coral reefs of the world: 2020 report. Global Coral Reef Monitoring Network (GCRMN) and International Coral Reef Initiative (ICRI); https://doi.org/10.59387/WOTJ9184 (2021).

  5. Okamoto, M., Nojima, S., Fujiwara, S. & Furushima, Y. Development of ceramic settlement devices for coral reef restoration using in situ sexual reproduction of corals. Fish. Sci. 74, 1245–1253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1444-2906.2008.01649.x (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Todinanahary, G. G. B. et al. Community-based coral aquaculture in Madagascar: A profitable economic system for a simple rearing technique?. Aquaculture 467, 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.07.012 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rinkevich, B. Restoration strategies for coral reefs damaged by recreational activities: The use of sexual and asexual recruits. Restor. Ecol. 3, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1995.tb00091.x (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boström-Einarsson, L. et al. Coral restoration – a systematic review of current methods, successes, failures and future directions. PLoS ONE 15, e0226631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226631 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Banaszak, A. T. et al. Applying coral breeding to reef restoration: Best practices, knowledge gaps, and priority actions in a rapidly-evolving field. Restor. Ecol. 31, e13913. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13913 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petersen, D. et al. The application of sexual coral recruits for the sustainable management of ex situ populations in public aquariums to promote coral reef conservation—SECORE Project. Aquat. Conserv. 16, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.716 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pollock, F. J. et al. Coral larvae for restoration and research: a large-scale method for rearing Acropora millepora larvae, inducing settlement, and establishing symbiosis. PeerJ 5, e3732. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3732 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Randall, C. J. et al. Sexual production of corals for reef restoration in the Anthropocene. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 635, 203–232. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps13206 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harrison, P., & Wallace, C. In Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals. Ecosystems of the World, Vol. 25 (ed Dubinsky, Z.) 133–196. (Coral Reefs, Elsevier, 1990).

  14. Negri, A., Webster, N., Hill, R. & Heyward, A. Metamorphosis of broadcast spawning corals in response to bacteria isolated from crustose algae. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 223, 121–131. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps223121 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Petersen, L.-E. et al. Mono- and multispecies biofilms from a crustose coralline alga induce settlement in the scleractinian coral Leptastrea purpurea. Coral Reefs 40, 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-021-02062-5 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Webster, N. S. et al. Metamorphosis of a scleractinian coral in response to microbial biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.70.2.1213-1221.2004 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Morse, D. E., Morse, A. N. C., Raimondi, P. T. & Hooker, N. Morphogen-based chemical flypaper for Agaricia humilis coral larvae. Biol. Bull. 186, 172–181. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542051 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tebben, J. et al. Chemical mediation of coral larval settlement by crustose coralline algae. Sci. Rep. 5, 10803. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10803 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abdul Wahab, M. A. et al. Hierarchical settlement behaviours of coral larvae to common coralline algae. Sci. Rep. 13, 5795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32676-4 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jorissen, H. et al. Coral larval settlement preferences linked to crustose coralline algae with distinct chemical and microbial signatures. Sci. Rep. 11, 14610. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94096-6 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Randall, C. J. et al. Larval precompetency and settlement behaviour in 25 Indo-Pacific coral species. Commun. Biol. 7, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-024-05824-3 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Whitman, T. N. et al. Settlement of larvae from four families of corals in response to a crustose coralline alga and its biochemical morphogens. Sci. Rep. 10, 16397. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-73103-2 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Babcock, R. & Mundy, C. Coral recruitment: consequences of settlement choice for early growth and survivorship in two scleractinians. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 206, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(96)02622-6 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ricardo, G. F. et al. Impacts of water quality on Acropora coral settlement: The relative importance of substrate quality and light. Sci. Total Environ. 777, 146079. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146079 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fong, J. et al. Effects of material type and surface roughness of settlement tiles on macroalgal colonisation and early coral recruitment success. Coral Reefs 43, 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02526-4 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fong, J. et al. The interplay of temperature, light, and substrate type in driving growth and reproduction of an important tropical crustose coralline alga. J. Appl. Phycol. 36, 3133–3145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-024-03312-z (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hoog Antink, M. M. et al. Porous ceramics with tailored pore size and morphology as substrates for coral larval settlement. Ceram. Int. 44, 16561–16571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.06.078 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lee, C. S., Walford, J. & Goh, B. P. L. Adding coral rubble to substrata enhances settlement of Pocillopora damicornis larvae. Coral Reefs 28, 529–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0467-y (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Leonard, C. et al. Performance of innovative materials as recruitment substrates for coral restoration. Restor. Ecol. 30, e13625. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13625 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mallela, J., Milne, B. C. & Martinez-Escobar, D. A comparison of epibenthic reef communities settling on commonly used experimental substrates: PVC versus ceramic tiles. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 486, 290–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2016.10.028 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ramsby, B. D. et al. Developing seeding devices and rapid deployment methods for upscaling coral reef restoration. Restor. Ecol. 34, e70206. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70206 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Whitman, T. N. et al. Seeded Acropora digitifera corals survive best on wave-exposed reefs with grazing from small fishes. Restor. Ecol. 33, e70016. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.70016 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nordborg, F. M. et al. Standard operating procedure: Optimised larval settlement in a high throughput coral aquaculture facility. SOP prepared for the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville QLD, 41 pp. https://gbrrestoration.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/SOP-Mass-settlement-of-coral-larvae.pdf (2024).

  34. Ramsby, B. D. et al. Low light intensity increased survival of coral spat in aquaculture. Coral Reefs 43, 627–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-024-02489-6 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heyward, A. J. & Negri, A. P. Natural inducers for coral larval metamorphosis. Coral Reefs 18, 273–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003380050193 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Harrington, L., Fabricius, K., De’ath, G. & Negri, A. Recognition and selection of settlement substrata determine post-settlement survival in corals. Ecology 85, 3428–3437. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0298 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sharp, K. H. et al. Induction of larval settlement in the reef coral Porites astreoides by a cultivated marine Roseobacter strain. Biol. Bull. 228, 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1086/BBLv228n2p98 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tran, C. & Hadfield, M. G. Larvae of Pocillopora damicornis (Anthozoa) settle and metamorphose in response to surface-biofilm bacteria. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 433, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps09192 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  39. O’Brien, P. A. et al. Light and dark biofilm adaptation impacts larval settlement in diverse coral species. Environ. Microbiome 20, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40793-025-00670-0 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Turnlund, A. C. et al. Understanding the role of micro-organisms in the settlement of coral larvae through community ecology. Mar. Biol. 172, 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-025-04607-6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Alker, A. T. et al. Linking bacterial tetrabromopyrrole biosynthesis to coral metamorphosis. ISME Commun. 3, 98. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-023-00309-6 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Sneed, J. M., Sharp, K. H., Ritchie, K. B. & Paul, V. J. The chemical cue tetrabromopyrrole from a biofilm bacterium induces settlement of multiple Caribbean corals. Proc. R. Soc. B 281, 20133086. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.3086 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Tebben, J. et al. Induction of larval metamorphosis of the coral Acropora millepora by Tetrabromopyrrole isolated from a Pseudoalteromonas bacterium. PLoS ONE 6, e19082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019082 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Petersen, L. E. et al. Photodegradation of a bacterial pigment and resulting hydrogen peroxide release enable coral settlement. Sci. Rep. 13, 3562. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30470-w (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Moeller, M., Nietzer, S. & Schupp, P. J. Neuroactive compounds induce larval settlement in the scleractinian coral Leptastrea purpurea. Sci. Rep. 9, 2291. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-38794-2 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Erwin, P. M. & Szmant, A. M. Settlement induction of Acropora palmata planulae by a GLW-amide neuropeptide. Coral Reefs 29, 929–939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-010-0634-1 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Iwao, K., Fujisawa, T. & Hatta, M. A cnidarian neuropeptide of the GLWamide family induces metamorphosis of reef-building corals in the genus Acropora. Coral Reefs 21, 127–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-002-0219-8 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Shikina, S. et al. Involvement of GLWamide neuropeptides in polyp contraction of the adult stony coral Euphyllia ancora. Sci. Rep. 10, 9427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66438-3 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Takahashi, T. & Hatta, M. The importance of GLWamide neuropeptides in cnidarian development and physiology. J. Amino Acids 2011, 424501. https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/424501 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Takahashi, T. et al. Systematic isolation of peptide signal molecules regulating development in hydra: LWamide and PW families. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 1241–1246. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.4.1241 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Kundu, S. et al. Biomimetic chemical microhabitats enhance coral settlement. Trends Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2025.03.019 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fujiwara, S. et al. Effect of substratum structural complexity of coral seedlings on the settlement and post-settlement survivorship of coral settlers. Oceans 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/oceans4010001 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Levenstein, M. A. et al. Millimeter-scale topography facilitates coral larval settlement in wave-driven oscillatory flow. PLoS ONE 17, e0274088. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274088 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Nozawa, Y. Effective size of refugia for coral spat survival. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 413, 145–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.12.008 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Randall, C. J., Giuliano, C., Heyward, A. J. & Negri, A. P. Enhancing coral survival on deployment devices with microrefugia. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.662263 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Petersen, D., Laterveer, M. & Schuhmacher, H. Innovative substrate tiles to spatially control larval settlement in coral culture. Mar. Biol. 146, 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-004-1503-7 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Whalan, S. et al. Larval settlement: the role of surface topography for sessile coral reef invertebrates. PLoS ONE 10, e0117675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117675 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Foster, T. & Gilmour, J. P. Seeing red: Coral larvae are attracted to healthy looking reefs. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 559, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11902 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Mason, B., Beard, M. & Miller, M. W. Coral larvae settle at a higher frequency on red surfaces. Coral Reefs 30, 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-011-0739-1 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Bridge, T. C. L. et al. A tenuis relationship: traditional taxonomy obscures systematics and biogeography of the Acropora tenuis species complex. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 202, zlad062. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlad062 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Grasso, L. C. et al. The biology of coral metamorphosis: molecular responses of larvae to inducers of settlement and metamorphosis. Dev. Biol. 353, 411–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2011.02.010 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Leitz, T., Morand, K. & Mann, M. Metamorphosin A: A novel peptide controlling development of the lower metazoan Hydractinia echinata (Coelenterata, Hydrozoa). Dev. Biol. 163, 440–446. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.1994.1160 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Brunner, R. Investigating receptors and signalling pathways of coral settlement and metamorphosis using proteomics, transcriptomics and phylogenetics [PhD, James Cook University]. James Cook University Research Repository; https://doi.org/10.25903/ggd7-xe43 (2023).

  64. Di Mauro, V. et al. Ecotoxicological effects of four commonly used organic solvents on the scleractinian coral Montipora digitata. Toxics 11, 4. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics11040367 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Abdul Wahab, M. A. et al. Standard operating procedure: Coral spawning, larval culturing and the production of coral spats in aquaculture for reef restoration. SOP prepared for the Reef Restoration and Adaptation Program. 36 (Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, QLD, 2022)

  66. Karacan, I. et al. The synthesis of hydroxyapatite from artificially grown Red Sea hydrozoan coral for antimicrobacterial drug delivery system applications. J. Aust. Ceram. Soc. 57, 399–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41779-020-00554-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  67. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; https://www.R-project.org/ (2023).

  68. Brooks, M. E. et al. GlmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J 9, 378–400. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2017-066 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  69. Hartig, F. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level / mixed) regression models. R package version 0.4.7; https://github.com/florianhartig/dharma (2024).

  70. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. R package version 3.5.2. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2016).

  71. Bartoń, K. MuMIn: Multi-model inference. R package version 1.47.5 (2023).

  72. Müller, W. A. & Leitz, T. Metamorphosis in the Cnidaria. Can. J. Zool. 80, 1755–1771. https://doi.org/10.1139/z02-130 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ishii, Y. et al. Gene expression alterations from reversible to irreversible stages during coral metamorphosis. Zoolog Lett. 8, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40851-022-00187-1 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  74. Schindler, S. & Bechtold, T. Mechanistic insights into the electrochemical oxidation of dopamine by cyclic voltammetry. J. Electroanal. Chem. 836, 94–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.01.069 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  75. Amar, K. O., Chadwick, N. E. & Rinkevich, B. Coral kin aggregations exhibit mixed allogeneic reactions and enhanced fitness during early ontogeny. BMC Evol. Biol. 8, 126. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-8-126 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  76. Doropoulos, C., Evensen, N. R., Gómez-Lemos, L. A. & Babcock, R. C. Density-dependent coral recruitment displays divergent responses during distinct early life-history stages. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4, 170082. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170082 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  77. Jiang, L. et al. Gregarious larval settlement mediates the responses of new recruits of the reef coral Acropora austera to ocean warming and acidification. Front. Mar. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2022.964803 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  78. Puill-Stephan, E., van Oppen, M. J. H., Pichavant-Rafini, K. & Willis, B. L. High potential for formation and persistence of chimeras following aggregated larval settlement in the broadcast spawning coral. Acropora millepora. Proc. R. Soc. B 279, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1035 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  79. Raymundo, L. & Maypa, A. Recovery of the Apo Island Marine Reserve, Philippines, 2 years after the El Niño bleaching event. Coral Reefs 21, 3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-002-0237-6 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  80. Rinkevich, B. Coral chimerism as an evolutionary rescue mechanism to mitigate global climate change impacts. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 1198–1206. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14576 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  81. Shefy, D., Shashar, N. & Rinkevich, B. Exploring traits of engineered coral entities to be employed in reef restoration. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 8, 1038. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8121038 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  82. Vidal-Dupiol, J. et al. Frontloading of stress response genes enhances robustness to environmental change in chimeric corals. BMC Biol. 20, 167. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01371-7 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  83. Carleton, J. H. & Sammarco, P. W. Effects of substratum irregularity on success of coral settlement: Quantification by comparative geomorphological techniques. Bull. Mar. Sci. 40, 85–98 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  84. Scardino, A. J., Harvey, E. & De Nys, R. Testing attachment point theory: Diatom attachment on microtextured polyimide biomimics. Biofouling 22, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010500506094 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  85. Nishikawa, A., Katoh, M. & Sakai, K. Larval settlement rates and gene flow of broadcast-spawning (Acropora tenuis) and planula-brooding (Stylophora pistillata) corals. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 256, 87–97. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps256087 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Manbarra, Bindal, and Wulgurukaba Traditional custodians of the land and sea country on which this work took place. We pay our respects to Elders past, present, and emerging, and acknowledge their roles as Australia’s first marine scientists and their continuing connections to land and sea countries. The authors thank the staff at the AIMS National Sea Simulator for their assistance in experimental setup, as well as the field team for assistance with coral collections. Additional thanks to G. Astbury for her assistance with preliminary experiments and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville MC, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia

    Nico D. Briggs, Andrew P. Negri, Andrea Severati & Florita Flores

  2. Division of Research & Innovation, AIMS@JCU, James Cook University and Australian Institute of Marine Science, PMB No. 3, Townsville MC, Townsville, QLD, 4810, Australia

    Andrew P. Negri & Florita Flores

  3. College of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD, 4811, Australia

    Elsa Antunes & Matthew Drane

Authors
  1. Nico D. Briggs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrew P. Negri
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elsa Antunes
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Matthew Drane
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Andrea Severati
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Florita Flores
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FF, AN, AS, and NB conceived the experimental design. FF and NB undertook the research and collected the data. EA and MD designed and produced the 3D printed ceramic designs. FF and NB analysed the data. FF, NB, and AN wrote the main manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florita Flores.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Briggs, N.D., Negri, A.P., Antunes, E. et al. Directing coral larval settlement in coral aquaculture for reef restoration. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37592-x

Download citation

  • Received: 09 October 2025

  • Accepted: 23 January 2026

  • Published: 05 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37592-x

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Great Barrier Reef
  • Ceramic 3D printing
  • Microtopography
  • Chemical cues
  • Neuropeptides
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research