Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Route-dependent dissemination with conserved blood–tumor barrier ultrastructure in intracranial metastasis models
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 14 March 2026

Route-dependent dissemination with conserved blood–tumor barrier ultrastructure in intracranial metastasis models

  • Jian Zhao1,
  • Yuehua Zhang2,
  • Zhigong Wei3,
  • Kai Li1,
  • Dan Li4 &
  • …
  • Yongsheng Wang1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 525 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Neuroscience
  • Oncology

Abstract

The dissemination route of brain metastases dictates their spatiotemporal distribution, but whether it alters the ultrastructural state of the blood-tumor barrier remains unresolved. Here, we compared a modified hematogenous dissemination model that minimizes extracranial signal confounds with a direct intracranial inoculation model. The hematogenous model produced multifocal brain lesions, whereas the intracranial model formed unifocal masses. Longitudinal bioluminescence imaging revealed significantly different growth rates between models, yet no statistically significant difference in overall survival was detected under the current cohort sizes and humane endpoints. Critically, exploratory transmission electron microscopy at the tumor-brain interface revealed a conserved pathological phenotype of the blood-tumor barrier in established lesions, irrespective of the seeding route. This pattern was characterized by endothelial cell swelling, a discontinuous basement membrane, and retraction of astrocytic end-feet. These findings suggest that while the seeding route determines the macroscopic pattern of disease, the established brain microenvironment imposes a stereotyped mode of neurovascular unit failure. This work provides a methodologically refined platform for studying brain metastasis and presents direct ultrastructural evidence consistent with a conserved blood-tumor barrier pathology, outlining a testable conceptual framework. These hypothesis-generating ultrastructural observations, derived from representative specimens, warrant quantitative validation.

Similar content being viewed by others

3D bioprinted multilayered cerebrovascular conduits to study cancer extravasation mechanism related with vascular geometry

Article Open access 24 November 2023

Multi-institutional atlas of brain metastases informs spatial modeling for precision imaging and personalized therapy

Article Open access 15 May 2025

The blood–tumour barrier in cancer biology and therapy

Article 12 July 2021

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files. The source data for tumor burden and body weights are provided in Supplementary Data 1.

References

  1. Schaeffer, S. & Iadecola, C. Revisiting the neurovascular unit. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 1198–1209 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lacoste, B., Prat, A., Freitas-Andrade, M. & Gu, C. The blood-brain barrier: Composition, properties, and roles in brain health. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 17, a041422 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Palomero-Gallagher, N. & Zilles, K. Cyto- and receptor architectonic mapping of the human brain. Handb Clin. Neurol 150, 355–387 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang, L., Xiong, X., Zhang, L. & Shen, J. Neurovascular unit: A critical role in ischemic stroke. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 27, 7–16 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Valiente, M. et al. The evolving landscape of brain metastasis. Trends Cancer 4, 176–196 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fidler, I. J. The pathogenesis of cancer metastasis: The ‘seed and soil’ hypothesis revisited. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 453–458 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kugler, E. C., Greenwood, J. & MacDonald, R. B. The ‘Neuro-Glial-Vascular’ unit: The role of glia in neurovascular unit formation and dysfunction. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 9, 732820 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Malanchi, I. et al. Interactions between cancer stem cells and their niche govern metastatic colonization. Nature 481, 85–89 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Calabrese, C. et al. A perivascular niche for brain tumor stem cells. Cancer Cell 11, 69–82 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miarka, L. & Valiente, M. Animal models of brain metastasis. Neurooncol. Adv. 3, v144–v156 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mann, B. et al. Opportunities and challenges for patient-derived models of brain tumors in functional precision medicine. npj Precis. Onc. 9, 47 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, C., Lowery, F. J. & Yu, D. Intracarotid cancer cell injection to produce mouse models of brain metastasis. JoVE 55085 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3791/55085.

  13. Ushio, Y., Chernik, N. L., Shapiro, W. R. & Posner, J. B. Metastic tumor of the brain: Development of an experimental model. Ann. Neurol. 2, 20–29 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kienast, Y. et al. Real-time imaging reveals the single steps of brain metastasis formation. Nat. Med. 16, 116–122 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lim, M. et al. Modeling brain metastasis by internal carotid artery injection of cancer cells. JoVE https://doi.org/10.3791/64216 (2022)

  16. Törteli, A., Tóth, R., Bari, F., Farkas, E. & Menyhárt, Á. Collateral is brain: Low perfusion triggers spreading depolarization and futile reperfusion after acute ischemic stroke. J. Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 44, 1881–1887 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Valiente, M. et al. Brain metastasis cell lines panel: A public resource of organotropic cell lines. Cancer Res. 80, 4314–4323 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Iadecola, C. The neurovascular unit coming of age: A journey through neurovascular coupling in health and disease. Neuron 96, 17–42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Palomero-Gallagher, N. et al. Multireceptor analysis in human neocortex reveals complex alterations of receptor ligand binding in focal epilepsies. Epilepsia 53, 1987–1997 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sweeney, M. D. et al. Vascular dysfunction-The disregarded partner of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s & Dementia 15, 158–167 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Knowland, D. et al. Stepwise recruitment of transcellular and paracellular pathways underlies blood-brain barrier breakdown in stroke. Neuron 82, 603–617 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garton, T., Gadani, S. P., Gill, A. J. & Calabresi, P. A. Neurodegeneration and demyelination in multiple sclerosis. Neuron 112, 3231–3251 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Andreone, B. J. et al. Blood-brain barrier permeability is regulated by lipid transport-dependent suppression of Caveolae-mediated transcytosis. Neuron 94, 581-594.e5 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, M. et al. Caveolae-mediated endothelial transcytosis across the blood-brain barrier in acute ischemic stroke. JCM 10, 3795 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bojarskaite, L. et al. Role of aquaporin-4 polarization in extracellular solute clearance. Fluids Barriers CNS 21, 28 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mehta, S. & Lo Cascio, C. Developmentally regulated signaling pathways in glioma invasion. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75(3), 385–402 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stanimirovic, D. B. & Friedman, A. Pathophysiology of the neurovascular unit: disease cause or consequence?. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32, 1207–1221 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Essig, M. et al. Perfusion MRI: The five most frequently asked clinical questions. Am. J. Roentgenol. 201, W495–W510 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lockman, P. R. et al. Heterogeneous blood-tumor barrier permeability determines drug efficacy in experimental brain metastases of breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 5664–5678 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, I. S. et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of soft tissue Tumors and Tumor-like lesions: Technical principles and clinical applications. Korean J Radiol 26, 1054 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 81872489.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant 81872489.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Thoracic Oncology Ward, Cancer Center, and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Jian Zhao, Kai Li & Yongsheng Wang

  2. West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Yuehua Zhang

  3. Department of Biotherapy, Cancer Center and State Key Laboratory of Biotherapy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Zhigong Wei

  4. Institute of Respiratory Health, Frontiers Science Center for Disease-Related Molecular Network, and Precision Medicine Research Center, Precision Medicine Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China

    Dan Li

Authors
  1. Jian Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yuehua Zhang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhigong Wei
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kai Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dan Li
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yongsheng Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, animal model establishment, and data collection were performed by Jian Zhao, Yuehua Zhang, Zhigong Wei, and Kai Li. Data analysis was performed by Jian Zhao, Yuehua Zhang, and Zhigong Wei. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Jian Zhao. Dan Li and Yongsheng Wang supervised the project. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and contributed to its critical revision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dan Li or Yongsheng Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical approval

All animal experiments were performed in strict accordance with a protocol approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University (Approval No. 20230214012). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the ARRIVE guidelines and relevant national and institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download XLSX )

Supplementary Material 2 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Wei, Z. et al. Route-dependent dissemination with conserved blood–tumor barrier ultrastructure in intracranial metastasis models. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37760-z

Download citation

  • Received: 05 November 2025

  • Accepted: 24 January 2026

  • Published: 14 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37760-z

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Brain metastasis
  • Neurovascular unit
  • Blood-tumor barrier
  • Animal model
  • Ultrastructure
  • Electron microscopy
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer