Abstract
In intensive cropping systems, limited understanding of how residues with contrasting biochemical qualities decompose leads to nutrient immobilization, poor nutrient release synchrony and persistent residue burning challenges. The decomposition dynamics of various crop residues displayed unexpected variations at both the early and late stages, with the precise underlying factors for these differential responses to diversity remaining unclear. We hypothesized that the chemical composition and biochemical diversity of crop residues specifically difference in lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, protein, phenol, nitrogen content and C: N ratio would substantially influence their decomposition dynamics and associated microbial and enzymatic responses at different time points. In an incubation experiment, we examined nine treatments, each with three replicates: maize stover (T1), rice straw (T2), cotton stalks (T3), redgram stalks (T4), greengram residue (T5), blackgram residue (T6), sunhemp residue (T7), soybean residue (T8), and sorghum stover (T9). We closely monitored the transformation of lignocellulose, total phenols and proteins in these crop residues using the litter bag method alongside measurements of soil enzyme activities and microbial population dynamics. Results revealed distinct decomposition patterns, where legume-based residues (sunhemp (T7), greengram (T5), blackgram (T6) and soybean (T8)) exhibited rapid degradation of lignocellulosic fractions and protein content within 60 days, associated with early peaks in microbial populations and enzyme activities (cellulase, xylanase, laccase and lignin peroxidase). In contrast, residues high in lignin, C:N ratio, lignin: N ratio and phenol: N ratio such as redgram stalks (T4), maize stover (T1), rice straw (T2), cotton stalks (T3) and sorghum stover (T9) decomposed more slowly, showing prolonged microbial activity and enzyme induction up to 120 days. Total phenol content initially declined (0–30 days after incorporation) and subsequently increased, reflecting the release and transformation of bound phenolics. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that residue biochemical traits, especially nitrogen content, lignin level and phenol content, strongly influenced microbial succession and enzymatic response. Overall, the decomposition sequence of biochemical components followed the order: lignin < cellulose < hemicellulose < proteins, and the enzyme activity followed the order: lignin peroxidase < cellulase < xylanase. These findings emphasize the importance of residue quality in regulating decomposition dynamics and offer actionable strategies for tailoring residue management to enhance nutrient cycling and soil health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. Data supporting the findings of this study can be provided upon request.
References
Thangarajan, R., Bolan, N. S., Tian, G., Naidu, R. & Kunhikrishnan, A. Role of organic amendment application on greenhouse gas emission from soil. Sci. Total Environ. 465, 72–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.01.031 (2013).
Ministry of New and Renewable Energy. Annual Report. (2016). http://mnre.gov.in/file-manager/annual-report/2016-2017/EN/pdf/1.pdf (2017).
Reddy, P. N., Kumari, J. A., Jayasree, G. & Tejashree, M. Influence of crop residue in addition to decomposition enhancers on soil nitrogen transformation and available macronutrients status during growth of maize. Int. J. Environ. Clim. Change. 12, 650–657. https://doi.org/10.9734/IJECC/2022/v12i1131017 (2022).
Halder, M., Liu, S., Zhang, Z. B., Guo, Z. C. & Peng, X. H. Effects of residue stoichiometric, biochemical and C functional features on soil aggregation during decomposition of eleven organic residues. Catena 202, 105288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2021.105288 (2021).
Stavi, I., Argaman, E. & Zaady, E. Positive impact of moderate stubble grazing on soil quality and organic carbon pool in dryland wheat agro-pastoral systems. Catena 146, 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.004 (2016).
Brichi, L. et al. Organic residues and their impact on soil health, crop production and sustainable agriculture: A review including bibliographic analysis. Soil. Use Manage. 39, 686–706. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12892 (2023).
Chaves, B. et al. The combination of residue quality, residue placement and soil mineral N content drives C and N dynamics by modifying N availability to microbial decomposers. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 163, 108434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108434 (2021).
Martins, L. F. et al. Metagenomic analysis of a tropical composting operation at the São Paulo zoo park reveals diversity of biomass degradation functions and organisms. PLoS ONE. 8, e61928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061928 (2013).
Hemati, A., Nazari, M., Asgari Lajayer, B., Smith, D. L. & Astatkie, T. Lignocellulosics in plant cell wall and their potential biological degradation. Folia Microbiol. 67, 671–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12223-022-00974-5 (2022).
Wickings, K., Grandy, A. S., Reed, S. C. & Cleveland, C. C. The origin of litter chemical complexity during decomposition. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1180–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01837.x (2012).
Li, Y., Li, S. & Sun, X. Fungal-driven mechanisms of carbon transformation and humification promoted by lignocellulose-degrading microbial inoculants during green waste composting. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 119569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2025.119569 (2025).
Sousa Junior, J. G. et al. Three-year soil carbon and nitrogen responses to sugarcane straw management. Bioenergy Res. 11, 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-017-9892-x (2018).
Cotrufo, M. F., Haddix, M. L., Kroeger, M. E. & Stewart, C. E. The role of plant input physical–chemical properties, and microbial and soil chemical diversity on the formation of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 168, 108648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108648 (2022).
Wu, J., Zhang, H., Cheng, X. & Liu, G. Nitrogen addition stimulates litter decomposition rate: from the perspective of the combined effect of soil environment and litter quality. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 179, 108992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.108992 (2023).
Su, Z., Zhu, X., Wang, Y., Mao, S. & Shangguan, Z. Litter C and N losses at different decomposition stages of Robinia pseudoacacia: the weaker effects of soil enzyme activities compared with those of litter quality and the soil environment. Front. Environ. Sci. 10, 956309. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.956309 (2022).
Daassi, R., Kasangana, P. B., Khasa, D. P. & Stevanovic, T. Monitoring transformation of two tropical lignocellulosics and their lignins after residence in Benin soils. Sci. Rep. 11, 21524. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-01091-y (2021).
Jackson, M. L. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of India, Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, 498–512 (1973).
Walkley, A. & Black, C. A. Estimation of organic carbon by chromic acid Titration method. Soil. Sci. 37, 29–38 (1934).
Mounika, C. et al. Effect of Pusa decomposer-mediated rice residue management on phosphorus fractionation in aggregate size classes under a rice–wheat system. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 396, 109994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2025.109994 (2026).
Bhargava, B. S. & Raghupathi, H. B. Analysis of plant materials for macro and micronutrients. Methods Anal. Soils Water Fertilizers. 32, 49–82 (1993).
Piper, C. S. Soil and Plant Analysis. Hans Publisher (1966).
Issac, R. A. & Kerber, J. D. Atomic absorption and flame photometry: techniques and uses in soil, plant and water analysis. In Instrumental methods for analysis of soil and plant tissue. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. 5, 17–37 (1971).
Allen, S. E., Grimshaw, H. M., Rowl, A. P. & Chapman, P. D. Chemical analysis. In Methods in Plant Ecology (eds Moo, S. B. & Chapman, P. D.) 285–344. Blackwell Scientific Publications (1986).
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures and some Applications). Agriculture Handbook No. 379 (United States Department of Agriculture, 1970).
Sharma, S. et al. Crop residue heterogeneity: decomposition by potential Indigenous ligno-cellulolytic microbes and enzymatic profiling. Curr. Res. Microb. Sci. 6, 100227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100227 (2024).
Singleton, V. L., Orthofer, R. & Lamuela-Raventós, R. M. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 299, 152–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(99)99017-1 (1999).
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. Practical Physiological Chemistry. Blakiston (1947).
Mandel, M. & Sternburg, D. Recent advances in cellular technology. J. Ferment. Technol. 54, 267–286 (1976).
Sandhu, D. K. & Kalra, M. K. Production of cellulose, Xylanase and pectinase by Trichoderma longibrachiatum on different substrates. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 79, 409–413 (1982).
Sharma, S., Kumawat, K. C. & Kaur, S. Potential of Indigenous ligno-cellulolytic microbial consortium to accelerate degradation of heterogeneous crop residues. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 29, 88331–88346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21809-3 (2022).
Tien, M. & Kirk, T. K. Lignin peroxidase of Phanerochaete Chrysosporium. Methods Enzymol. 161, 238–249 (1983).
Singh, R. P., Garcha, H. S. & Khanna, P. K. Laccase production by Pleurotus Sp. Indian J. Microbiol. 28, 38–41 (1988).
Thornton, H. G. On the development of a standardized agar for counting soil bacteria with especial regard to the repression of spreading colonies. Ann. Appl. Biol. 9, 241–274. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1922.tb05958.x (1922).
Martin, J. P. Use of acid, Rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi. Soil. Sci. 69, 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195003000-00006 (1950).
Allen, O. N. Experiments in Soil Bacteriology (Burgess Publishing Company, 1957).
Schmidt, E. L. & Caldwell, A. C. A practical manual of soil microbiology laboratory methods. Soils Bull. Food Agric. Organ. U N. 10, 72–75 (1967).
Panse, V. G. & Sukhatme, P. V. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers Vol. 238 (Indian Council of Agricultural Research, 1978).
Hisham, M., Chandran, M., Gopinath, P. P. & J., & RAISINS: integrating R and AI for agricultural data analysis. J. Sustainable Technol. Agric. 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15622128 (2025). PAPAYA Academic Press.
Ntonta, S., Mathew, I., Zengeni, R., Muchaonyerwa, P. & Chaplot, V. Crop residues differ in their decomposition dynamics: review of available data from world literature. Geoderma 419, 115855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.115855 (2022).
Yuan, Y. et al. Recent advances in Understanding the effects of lignin structural characteristics on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 14, 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-021-02054-1 (2021).
Rencoret, J. et al. Del Rio, J. C. Variations in the composition and structure of the lignins of oat (Avena sativa L.) straws according to variety and planting season. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 242, 124811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124811 (2023).
Yang, H. et al. Effects of C/N ratio on lignocellulose degradation and enzyme activities in aerobic composting. Horticulturae 7, 482. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae7110482 (2021).
Liu, S. et al. Chemical composition of plant residues regulates soil organic carbon turnover in typical soils with contrasting textures in Northeast China Plain. Agronomy 12, 74–77. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030747
Zhong, Y. et al. Microbial community assembly and metabolic function during wheat straw decomposition under different nitrogen fertilization treatments. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 56, 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-020-01438-z (2020).
Chen, X. et al. Carbon and nitrogen forms in soil organic matter influenced by incorporated wheat and corn residues. Soil. Sci. Plant. Nutr. 63, 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2017.1359797 (2017).
Zheng, G. et al. Degradation of rice straw at low temperature using a novel microbial consortium LTF-27 with efficient ability. Bioresour Technol. 304, 123064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123064 (2020).
Jat, H. S. et al. Soil enzymes activity: effect of climate smart agriculture on rhizosphere and bulk soil under cereal based systems of north-west India. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 103, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103292 (2021).
Sun, D., Lv, Z. W., Rao, J., Tian, R. & Sun, S. Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment on the dissolution and structural evolution of hemicelluloses and lignin. Carbohydr. Polym. 281, 119050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.119050 (2021).
Panigrahi, S., Tiwari, B. R., Brar, S. K. & Dubey, B. K. Thermo-chemo-sonic pretreatment of lignocellulosic waste: evaluating anaerobic biodegradability and environmental impacts. Bioresour Technol. 361, 127675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127675 (2022).
Ostby, H. & Várnai, A. Hemicellulolytic enzymes in lignocellulose processing. Essays Biochem. 67, 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1042/EBC20220154 (2023).
Subaedah, S. & Aladin, A. Fertilization of nitrogen, phosphor and application of green manure of Crotalaria juncea in increasing yield of maize in marginal dry land. Agric. Agric. Sci. Procedia. 9, 20–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2016.02.114 (2016).
Meng, L., Xu, C. & Wu, F. Microbial co-occurrence networks driven by low-abundance microbial taxa during composting dominate lignocellulose degradation. Sci. Total Environ. 845, 157197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157197 (2022).
Kunnika, S. & Pranee, A. Influence of enzyme treatment on bioactive compounds and colour stability of betacyanin in flesh and Peel of red Dragon fruit Hylocereus polyrhizus (Weber) Britton and Rose. Int. Food Res. J. 18, 1437–1444 (2011).
Navas, L. E. et al. Laccase-catalyzed conversion of residual agricultural biomass to lignin-derived aromatic compounds. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 41, 197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-025-04440-5 (2025).
Blánquez, A. et al. Laccase SilA from Streptomyces Ipomoeae CECT 3341, a key enzyme for the degradation of lignin from agricultural residues? PLoS ONE. 12, e0187649. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187649 (2017).
Chen, X. et al. Lignin and cellulose dynamics with straw incorporation in two contrasting cropping soils. Sci. Rep. 8, 1633. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-20134-5 (2018).
Fang, Y. et al. Nutrient supply enhanced wheat residue-carbon mineralization, microbial growth, and microbial carbon-use efficiency when residues were supplied at high rate in contrasting soils. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 126, 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.09.003 (2018).
Goswami, S. B., Mondal, R. & Mandi, S. K. Crop residue management options in rice–rice system: A review. Arch. Agron. Soil. Sci. 66, 1218–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2019.1661994 (2020).
Shahbaz, M. et al. Microbial decomposition of soil organic matter is mediated by quality and quantity of crop residues: mechanisms and thresholds. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 53, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-016-1174-9 (2017).
Arcand, M. M., Helgason, B. L. & Lemke, R. L. Microbial crop residue decomposition dynamics in organic and conventionally managed soils. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 107, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.07.001 (2016).
Reddy, P. N. et al. Managing crop residues: impacts on soil C:N ratio and microbial activity with the addition of a decomposition enhancer. Int. J. Adv. Biochem. Res. 8, 295–304. https://doi.org/10.33545/26174693.2024.v8.i9Sd.2112 (2024).
Nunes, C. S. & Kunamneni, A. Laccases - properties and applications. In Enzymes in Human and Animal Nutrition 133–161 (Academic, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805419-2.00007-1.
Banerjee, S., Bora, S., Thrall, P. H. & Richardson, A. E. Soil C and N as causal factors of Spatial variation in extracellular enzyme activity across grassland–woodland ecotones. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 105, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2016.04.002 (2016).
Sharma, S. & Singh, P. Tillage intensity and straw retention impact on soil organic carbon, phosphorus and biological pools in soil aggregates under rice–wheat cropping system in Punjab, north-western India. Eur. J. Agron. 149, 126913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2023.126913 (2023).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Professor Jayashankar Telangana Agricultural University for providing necessary facilities to carry out the research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Peram Nagaseshi Reddy performed conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation and writing original draft preparation.J. Aruna Kumari and Sanjay Tiwari performed Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision.Chinthala Mounika and Meka Shivaram Reddy- Statistical analysis, Figures drawing, Writing - Review & Editing, Lab analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Consent for publication
All authors consent to publish this work.
Informed consent
All authors consent to participate in publication of these data.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Reddy, P.N., Kumari, J.A., Mounika, C. et al. Characterization and dynamics of lignocellulosic components, enzyme activities and microbial populations in diverse crop residues during decomposition. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37886-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37886-0
