Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Estimation of surface PM2.5 over the Indo-Gangetic Basin using MERRA-2 reanalysis and machine learning
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 25 March 2026

Estimation of surface PM2.5 over the Indo-Gangetic Basin using MERRA-2 reanalysis and machine learning

  • Vivek Singh1,
  • Sumit Singh1,2,
  • Nabin Sharma3,
  • Amarendra Singh4,
  • Aman Srivastava5,
  • Atul Kumar Srivastava1,
  • Deewan Singh Bisht1,
  • Kalpana Patel3,
  • Neeti Singh6,
  • Mansour Almazroui7,8 &
  • …
  • Arti Choudhary9 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 1386 Accesses

  • 7 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Climate sciences
  • Environmental sciences
  • Environmental social sciences

Abstract

Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is a significant air pollutant in the Indo Gangetic Basin (IGB), where levels frequently exceed national and WHO air quality standards. Ground observations from 183 CPCB automatic stations, along with MERRA-2 reanalysis products and meteorological variables, were utilized in this study to analyse PM2.5 characteristics over a recent decade for the period from 2014–2023. A machine learning (ML) framework was developed using Random Forest, Extra Trees, LightGBM, and a stacking ensemble model to improve surface PM2.5 estimation in four major IGB cities: Delhi, Kanpur, Lucknow, and Patna. It is found that the raw MERRA-2 estimates systematically underestimated PM2.5, with R2 values of only 0.28–0.42 and RMSE as high as 82 µg m−3. By contrast, the stacking ensemble achieved R2 values of 0.79–0.82, FAC2 above 0.94, RMSE reduced to 27–31 µg m−3, and near-zero bias (1.7–2.3 µg m−3). The model successfully reproduced extreme winter pollution episodes as well as monsoon conditions, highlighting the critical role of meteorological parameters such as boundary layer height, wind speed, and precipitation in regulating PM2.5 variability. Trajectory clustering and concentration-weighted trajectory (CWT) analysis showed that north-westerly transport contributes 55–65% of wintertime PM2.5 in Delhi, Kanpur, and Lucknow, while Patna is affected by both regional inflows and local sources. Major contributing regions include Punjab, Haryana, Rajasthan, and the Nepal plains, associated with crop residue burning and dust transport. By integrating ground observations, reanalysis data, meteorological predictors, and atmospheric transport analysis, this study provides a robust framework for improving PM2.5 prediction and identifying dominant pollution sources in the IGB. The results provide scientific evidence for designing both regional and city-specific mitigation strategies to reduce exposure in one of the world’s most polluted and densely populated regions.

Data availability

The datasets and codes generated and/or analysed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional/data policy restrictions, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Ojha, N. et al. On the widespread enhancement in fine particulate matter across the Indo-Gangetic Plain towards winter. Sci. Rep. 10, 5862 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali, M. A. et al. Long-term PM2.5 exposure in Bangladesh: identification of pollution hotspots, trends, sources and health risk assessment. Air Qual. Atmos. Health https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-025-01768-7 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wan Mahiyuddin, W. R., Ismail, R., Mohammad Sham, N., Ahmad, N. I. & Nik Hassan, N. M. N. Cardiovascular and respiratory health effects of fine particulate matters (PM2.5): A review on time series studies. Atmosphere 14, 856 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nkansah, F. K., Durosimi Belford, E. J., Hogarh, J. N. & Anim, A. K. Assessment of ambient air quality and health risks from vehicular emissions in urban Ghana: A case study of Winneba. J. Air Pollut. Health https://doi.org/10.18502/japh.v10i1.18092 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chatterjee, D. et al. Source contributions to fine particulate matter and attributable mortality in India and the surrounding region. Environ. Sci. Technol. 57, 10263–10275 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma, N., Dahal, S., Patel, K. & Kumar, S. Study of the correlation between Angstrom exponent and fine mode fraction in the Indo-Gangetic plain using ground-based remote sensing AERONET Data. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 53, 975–991 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aslam, M. Y. et al. Seasonal characteristics of boundary layer over a high-altitude rural site in western India: Implications on dispersal of particulate matter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 28, 35266–35277 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paulot, F., Naik, V. & W. Horowitz, L. Reduction in near‐surface wind speeds with increasing CO2 may Worsen winter air quality in the Indo‐Gangetic Plain. Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, (2022).

  9. Dwivedi, P., Radha, R. S., Shekhar, H. & Sharma, S. K. The impact assessment of diwali firecrackers emissions on air quality in Delhi, India: a comparative study of eight consecutive years (2017–2024). J. Atmos. Chem. 82, 9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandal, S. et al. Nationwide estimation of daily ambient PM2.5 from 2008 to 2020 at 1 km2 in India using an ensemble approach. PNAS Nexus 3, pgae088 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma, N., Dave, J. A., Kumar, S., Patel, K. & Singh, A. K. Variability in the concentration of particulate matter in Delhi-NCR: Analysis and prediction using machine learning algorithms. Atmos. Environ. 360, 121422 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, S. et al. Reconstructing long-term (1980–2022) daily ground particulate matter concentrations in India (LongPMInd). Earth System Science Data 16, 3565–3577 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mandal, S. et al. Assessing daily PM2.5 at every square kilometer of India over 2008–2020 using a machine learning framework. ISEE Conf. Abstr. 2022, (2022).

  14. Anand, M. & D., Sahu, A. & Prakash, J.,. Assessment of fine aerosol in two different climate regions of India using MERRA-2 products, ground-based measurements, and machine learning. Aerosol Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41810-024-00279-9 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Masood, A. et al. Improving PM2.5 prediction in New Delhi using a hybrid extreme learning machine coupled with snake optimization algorithm. Sci. Rep. 13, 21057 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prakriti, et al. Deciphering seasonal variability and source dynamics of urban pollutants over Delhi under surface meteorological influence using ground-based and trajectory modeling techniques. Earth Syst. Environ. 9, 1447–1463 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shukla, G. & Kumar, A. Chemical composition of aerosols over the Bay of Bengal based on global reanalyses data and on-board ship measurements. Int. J. Remote Sens. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2025.2577974 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pant, P. et al. Characterization of ambient PM2.5 at a pollution hotspot in New Delhi, India and inference of sources. Atmos. Environ. 109, 178–189 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Das, M., Das, A., Ghosh, S., Sarkar, R. & Saha, S. Spatio-temporal concentration of atmospheric particulate matter (PM2.5) during pandemic: A study on most polluted cities of indo-gangetic plain. Urban Climate 35, 100758 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Srimuruganandam, B. & Shiva Nagendra, S. M. Source characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 mass using a chemical mass balance model at urban roadside. Sci. Total Environ. 433, 8–19 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Saharan, U. S. et al. Hotspot driven air pollution during crop residue burning season in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, India. Environ. Pollut. 350, 124013 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gargava, P. & Rajagopalan, V. Source apportionment studies in six Indian cities—Drawing broad inferences for urban PM10 reductions. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 9, 471–481 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma, N., Kumar, S. & Patel, K. Variability of the optical and radiative characteristics of aerosols and classification of aerosol types over the Indo-Gangetic Plain during 2008 to 2018. J. Sci. Res. 69, 48–58 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma, N., Dahal, S., Chaurasiya, S. K., Kumar, S. & Patel, K. Impact of climatic factors on volume aerosol size distribution over Northern India. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 277, 106633 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dey, S. et al. A satellite-based high-resolution (1-km) Ambient PM2.5 database for India over two decades (2000–2019): Applications for air quality management. Remote Sens. 12, 3872 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganguly, T., Selvaraj, K. L. & Guttikunda, S. K. National clean air programme (NCAP) for Indian cities: Review and outlook of clean air action plans. Atmos. Environ. X 8, 100096 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Randles, C. A. et al. The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part I: system description and data assimilation evaluation. J. Clim. 30, 6823–6850 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gelaro, R. et al. The modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2). J. Clim. 30, 5419–5454 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Singh, S. et al. Assessment of surface PM2.5 concentrations over India using modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis data. Pure Appl. Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-025-03666-6 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Buchard, V. et al. Evaluation of the surface PM2.5 in version 1 of the NASA MERRA aerosol reanalysis over the United States. Atmos. Environ. 125, 100–111 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peng, W. & Weng, F. Impacts of aerosol scattering and absorption on FY‐4B geostationary interferometric infrared sounder (GIIRS) observations. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 130, (2025).

  32. Su, L., Yuan, Z., Fung, J. C. H. & Lau, A. K. H. A comparison of HYSPLIT backward trajectories generated from two GDAS datasets. Sci. Total Environ. 506–507, 527–537 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Luo, Y., Wei, H. & Yang, K. The impact of biomass burning occurred in the Indo-China Peninsula on PM2.5 and its spatiotemporal characteristics over Yunnan Province. Sci. Total Environ. 908, 168185 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dimitriou, K., Remoundaki, E., Mantas, E. & Kassomenos, P. Spatial distribution of source areas of PM2.5 by concentration weighted trajectory (CWT) model applied in PM2.5 concentration and composition data. Atmos. Environ. 116, 138–145 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Warner, M. S. C. Introduction to PySPLIT: A Python Toolkit for NOAA ARL’s HYSPLIT model. Comput. Sci. Eng. 20, 47–62 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Cui, L., Song, X. & Zhong, G. Comparative analysis of three methods for HYSPLIT atmospheric trajectories clustering. Atmosphere 12, 698 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Dimitriou, K. The dependence of PM size distribution from meteorology and local-regional contributions, in Valencia (Spain)—A CWT model approach. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 15, 1979–1989 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Brereton, C. A. & Johnson, M. R. Identifying sources of fugitive emissions in industrial facilities using trajectory statistical methods. Atmos. Environ. 51, 46–55 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sayeed, A. et al. Hourly and Daily PM 2.5 Estimations Using MERRA‐2: A machine learning approach. Earth Space Sci. 9, (2022).

  40. Hu, X. et al. Estimating PM 2.5 concentrations in the conterminous United States using the random forest approach. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 6936–6944 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Doris, M. et al. Eighteen years of daily PM2.5 predictions (2005–2022) for a region of western Canada: Machine learning and satellite inputs for applications in rural health. Atmos. Environ. 355, 121281 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Navinya, C. D., Vinoj, V. & Pandey, S. K. Evaluation of PM2.5 surface concentrations simulated by NASA’s MERRA version 2 aerosol reanalysis over India and its relation to the air quality index. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 20, 1329–1339 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Dhandapani, A., Iqbal, J. & Kumar, R. N. Application of machine learning (individual vs stacking) models on MERRA-2 data to predict surface PM2.5 concentrations over India. Chemosphere 340, 139966 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kumar, P. et al. New directions: Air pollution challenges for developing megacities like Delhi. Atmos. Environ. 122, 657–661 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Guttikunda, S. K. & Jawahar, P. Atmospheric emissions and pollution from the coal-fired thermal power plants in India. Atmos. Environ. 92, 449–460 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D. & Pozzer, A. The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale. Nature 525, 367–371 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Singh, A., Patel, A., Satish, R., Tripathi, S. N. & Rastogi, N. Wintertime oxidative potential of PM2.5 over a big urban city in the central Indo-Gangetic Plain. Sci. Total Environ. 905, 167155 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Kumar, A., Yadav, I. C., Shukla, A. & Devi, N. L. Seasonal variation of PM2.5 in the central Indo-Gangetic Plain (Patna) of India: Chemical characterization and source assessment. SN Appl. Sci. 2, 1366 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Singh, S. et al. Assessment of surface PM2.5 concentrations over India using modern-era retrospective analysis for research and applications, version 2 (MERRA-2) reanalysis data. Pure Appl. Geophys. 182, 1713–1735 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kumari, S., Verma, N., Lakhani, A. & Kumari, K. M. Severe haze events in the Indo-Gangetic Plain during post-monsoon: Synergetic effect of synoptic meteorology and crop residue burning emission. Sci. Total Environ. 768, 145479 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tripathi, S. N., Yadav, S. & Sharma, K. Air pollution from biomass burning in India. Environ. Res. Lett. 19, 073007 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Roy, C., Ayantika, D. C., Girach, I. & Chakrabarty, C. Intense biomass burning over northern India and its impact on air quality, chemistry and climate. In 169–204 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7727-4_8.

  53. Sharma, N., Kumar, S. & Patel, K. Aerosol type classification and its temporal distribution in Kanpur using ground-based remote sensing. J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys. 265, 106366 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Singh, N. et al. Aerosol chemistry, transport, and climatic implications during extreme biomass burning emissions over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 18, 14197–14215 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mogno, C., Palmer, P. I., Knote, C., Yao, F. & Wallington, T. J. Seasonal distribution and drivers of surface fine particulate matter and organic aerosol over the Indo-Gangetic Plain. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 21, 10881–10909 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Buchard, V. et al. The MERRA-2 aerosol reanalysis, 1980 onward. Part II: evaluation and case studies. J. Clim. 30, 6851–6872 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Arif, M., Kumar, R., Kumar, R., Eric, Z. & Gourav, P. Ambient black carbon, PM2.5 and PM10 at Patna: Influence of anthropogenic emissions and brick kilns. Sci. Total Environ. 624, 1387–1400 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kumar, P. et al. Seasonal and spatial variations in particulate matter, black carbon and metals in Delhi, India’s Megacity. Urban Sci. 8, 101 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ghosh, S., Biswas, J., Guttikunda, S., Roychowdhury, S. & Nayak, M. An investigation of potential regional and local source regions affecting fine particulate matter concentrations in Delhi, India. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 65, 218–231 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Gupta, L. et al. Assessment of PM10 and PM2.5 over Ghaziabad, an industrial city in the Indo-Gangetic Plain: spatio-temporal variability and associated health effects. Environ. Monitor. Assess. 193, 735 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ravindra, K., Singh, T., Mandal, T. K., Sharma, S. K. & Mor, S. Seasonal variations in carbonaceous species of PM2.5 aerosols at an urban location situated in Indo-Gangetic Plain and its relationship with transport pathways, including the potential sources. J. Environ. Manag. 303, 114049 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Sembhi, H. et al. Post-monsoon air quality degradation across Northern India: assessing the impact of policy-related shifts in timing and amount of crop residue burnt. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 104067 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Rahman, M. M., Begum, B. A., Hopke, P. K., Nahar, K. & Thurston, G. D. Assessing the PM2.5 impact of biomass combustion in megacity Dhaka, Bangladesh. Environ. Pollut. 264, 114798 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Emily, U. Bending Agricultural Burning Trajectories in Eastern India (Graduate School of Cornell University, 2023).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mazzeo, A. et al. Impact of residential combustion and transport emissions on air pollution in Santiago during winter. Atmos. Environ. 190, 195–208 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB), India, for providing long-term surface PM2.5 measurements from its monitoring network, which formed the observational backbone of this study. Authors express their gratitude to Manipal University Jaipur for providing Open access funding for the current publication. We also thank the NASA Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) for the provision of the MERRA-2 reanalysis products and the meteorological variables used in this analysis. The computational facilities and research infrastructure provided by the authors’ host institutions are duly acknowledged. The authors also express their sincere respect and appreciation to the Director of the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), Pune, Dr. A. Suryachandra Rao, for his guidance, encouragement, and continued support towards ongoing collaborative research in atmospheric and air quality sciences. The integration of multi-source datasets, combined with advanced machine learning frameworks, was made possible through these resources. The authors gratefully acknowledge the Ministry of Earth Sciences (MoES), Government of India, New Delhi for their guidance, support, and collaborative framework that facilitated this research. The authors also acknowledge the scientific discussions and constructive feedback from colleagues that helped refine the methodology and strengthen the interpretations presented in this work. We also express our appreciation for the ‘PyCaret’ machine learning framework, an open-source, low-code Python library that streamlines end-to-end ML workflows by automating data preparation, model training, comparison, and deployment.

Author statement

The views and conclusions presented in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the perspectives of their affiliated organizations. This work is entirely original, has not been submitted elsewhere, and the copyright of this article is exclusively held by the Scientific Reports Journal.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Manipal University Jaipur.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Ministry of Earth Sciences, New Delhi, 110060, India

    Vivek Singh, Sumit Singh, Atul Kumar Srivastava & Deewan Singh Bisht

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Institute of Engineering and Technology, Sitapur Road, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, 226021, India

    Sumit Singh

  3. Department of Physics, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Delhi-NCR Campus, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, 201204, India

    Nabin Sharma & Kalpana Patel

  4. Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India

    Amarendra Singh

  5. Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Haridwar, 247667, India

    Aman Srivastava

  6. India Meteorological Department, Ministry of Earth Sciences, Lodi Road, New Delhi, 110003, India

    Neeti Singh

  7. Centre for Excellence for Climate Change Research/Department of Meteorology, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

    Mansour Almazroui

  8. Climatic Research Unit, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK

    Mansour Almazroui

  9. Department of Biosciences, School of Physical & Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Technology & Architecture, Manipal University Jaipur, Jaipur, 303007, India

    Arti Choudhary

Authors
  1. Vivek Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sumit Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nabin Sharma
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Amarendra Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Aman Srivastava
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Atul Kumar Srivastava
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Deewan Singh Bisht
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kalpana Patel
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Neeti Singh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Mansour Almazroui
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Arti Choudhary
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

CRediT Taxonomy **VS:** Conceptualization; Formal analysis; Visualization; Software, Validation, Writing—original draft; and Writing—review &;editing. **SS:** Visualization, Software; **NS:** Visualization, Software, **AS:** Data curation; Formal analysis; Visualization, **AS:** Data Curation; Visualization; **AKS:** Supervision; Validation, **DSB:** Data Curation; Visualization, **KP:** Visualization; Validation, **NS:** Software; Validation, **MA:** Supervision, **AC:** Supervision, Software, Validation.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Vivek Singh or Arti Choudhary.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, V., Singh, S., Sharma, N. et al. Estimation of surface PM2.5 over the Indo-Gangetic Basin using MERRA-2 reanalysis and machine learning. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37934-9

Download citation

  • Received: 10 October 2025

  • Accepted: 28 January 2026

  • Published: 25 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37934-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Decadal PM2.5
  • Machine learning
  • Boundary layer height
  • Indo Gangetic Basin
  • Trajectory clustering
  • Concentration-weighted trajectory
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene