Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Investigation of magnetic orientation effects on interior rotor BLDC motor performance for EVs: a response surface methodology approach
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 02 February 2026

Investigation of magnetic orientation effects on interior rotor BLDC motor performance for EVs: a response surface methodology approach

  • V. Chandra1,
  • P. S. Manoharan1,
  • G. Thenmozhi2 &
  • …
  • J. Hemalatha3 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 129 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering

Abstract

Interior rotor brushless DC motors (BLDCMs) are lightweight, compact, and efficient, offering high torque over a wide speed range, which makes them well suited for electric vehicle (EV) applications. However, cogging torque (CGT) remains a significant challenge, as it leads to noise, vibration, torque ripple, and jerky operation in EVs. In this work, an interior rotor BLDCM is designed with a focus on magnet orientation tuning combined with rotor skew angle adjustment, which is distinctly different from conventional magnet geometry modification or slot skewing approaches reported in prior literature. Twelve prototype design cases (PDCs) are developed by varying the permanent magnet orientation and skew angle using Motorsolve finiteelement simulations. The models are evaluated based on key performance parameters, including torque, CGT, back electromotive force, and efficiency. Response Surface Methodology (RSM) is employed to identify the optimal design that simultaneously maximizes torque and efficiency while minimizing CGT. The optimal design (PDC9), evaluated with respect to the baseline configuration PDC1, achieves a 43% improvement in torque, a near-zero CGT.The selected model is further prototyped and experimentally validated, confirming the simulation results. The proposed magnet orientation-based optimization strategy provides an effective and practical solution for developing high-performance BLDCMs for EV applications such as hybrid mopeds.

Data availability

All data analyzed during this study are included in this article.

References

  1. Mohanraj, D., Gopalakrishnan, J., Chokkalingam, B. & Mihet-Popa, L. Critical aspects of electric motor drive controllers and mitigation of torque ripple-review. IEEE Access. 10, 73635–73674. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3187515 (2022).

  2. Ning, S. et al. A novel double stator hybrid-excited flux reversal permanent magnet machine with Halbach arrays for electric vehicle traction applications. IEEE Access. 11, 113255113263. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3323933 (2023).

  3. Chamchuen, N., Fernando, A. S. & Khunkitti, P. Modeling and optimal configuration design of fluxbarrier for torque improvement of rotor flux switching permanent magnet machine. Energies. 15(22), 8429. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15228429 (2022).

  4. Hajji, T. E. et al. Optimal design of high-speed electric machines for electric vehicles: A case study of 100 kW v-shaped interior PMSM. Machines. 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/machines11010057 (2023).

  5. Kamaraj, V., Jayashri, R., Jeevananthan, S. Emerging solutions for e-Mobility and Smart Grids (Springer, 2021).

  6. Rahim, N. A., Wooi, H., Ping & Tadjuddin, M. Design of axial flux permanent magnet brushless DC motor for direct drive of an electric vehicle. 2007. IEEE Power Eng. Soc. Gen. Meeting IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2007.385615 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caricchi, F. et al. Design and construction of a wheel-directly-coupled axial-flux PM motor prototype for EVs. In Proc. of. IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting, vol. 2. https://doi.org/10.1109/IAS.1994.377477 (IEEE, 1994).

  8. Carunaiselvane, C. & Jeevananthan, S. Generalized procedure for BLDC motor design and substantiation in MagNet 7.1.1 software. In 2012 Int.Conf. on Computing, Electronics and Electrical Technologies (ICCEET), India, 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCEET.2012.6203783 (2012).

  9. Devi, K. U. & Sanavullah, M. Y. Performance analysis of exterior(outer) rotor permanent magnet brushless DC (ERPMBLDC) motor by finite element method. In 2011 3rd International Conference on Electronics Computer Technology, India, 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECTECH.2011.5941785 (2011).

  10. Wu, Y. C. & Lin, B. W. Computer-aided design of a brushless DC motor with exterior-rotor configuration. Comput. Aided Des. Appl. 9 (4), 457–469. https://doi.org/10.3722/cadaps.2012.457-469 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnan, R. DC Motor Drives Permanent Magnet Synchronous and Brushless DC Motor Drives. (Taylor & Francis Group Thames, 2010).

  12. Anand, M., Sundaram, M., Sivakumar, P. & Angamuthu, A. Development of high-temperature permanent magnet synchronous motor for autonomous robotic navigation: A design and finite element analysis approach. Bull. Pol. Acad. Sci. Tech. Sci. 72 (4), 150108–150108. https://doi.org/10.24425/bpasts.2024.150108 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jia, H., Cheng, M., Zhao, W. H. W. & Li, W. Torque ripple suppression in flux-switching PM motor by harmonic current injection based on voltage space-vector modulation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 46 (6), 1527–1530. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2010.2040250 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abbaszadeh, K., Alam, F. R. & Saied, S. A. Cogging torque optimization in surface-mounted permanent-magnet motors by using design of experiment. Energy. Conv. Manag. 52 (10), 3075–3082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2011.04.009 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chau, K. T., Cui, W., Jiang, J. Z. & Wang, Z. Design of permanentmagnet brushless motors with asymmetric air gap for electric vehicles. J. Appl. Phys. 99 (8). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2173615 (2006).

  16. Raja, M. S. & Geethalakshmi, B. Modified rotor material for minimization of torque ripple for interior permanent magnet BLDC motor. Mater. Today Proc. 5(2), 3639–3647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2017.11.614 (2018).

  17. Thenmozhi, G., Radhika, A. & Mithun, B. A simulation-based investigation on the Performance of BLDC motor used in Electric Vehicles for varied magnetic materials. In 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS),India, 875–879. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACCS54159.2022.9785117

  18. Ackermann, B., Janssen, J. H. H., Sottek, R. & van Steen, R. I. New technique for reducing cogging torque in a class of brushless DC motors. IEE Proc. B Electr. Power Appl. 139(4), 315–320. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-b.1992.0038 (1992).

  19. Park, Y. U., Cho, J. H. & Kim, D. K. Cogging torque reduction of single-phase brushless DC motor with a tapered air-gap using optimizing notch size and position. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 51 (6), 4455–4463. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.2015.2453131 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Braga Filho, E. R., Lima, A. M. N. & Araujo, T. S. Reducing cogging torque in interior permanent magnet machines without skewing. IEEE Trans. Magn. 34(5 PART 1), 3648–3651. https://doi.org/10.1109/20.717862 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhu, Z. Q. & Howe, D. Influence of design parameters on cogging torque in permanent magnet machines. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 15(4), 407–412. https://doi.org/10.1109/60.900501 (2000).

  22. Dönmezer, Y. & Ergene, L. T. Cogging torque analysis of interior-type permanent-magnet brushless DC motor used in washers. In 2009 8th Int. Symp. Adv. Electromechanical Motion Syst. Electr. Drives Jt. Symp. Electromotion, vol. 2009, no. July, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/Electromotion.2009.5259154 (2009).

  23. Anuja, T. A., M, A. N. D., Senthilkumar, R., Rajesh, K. S. & Brindha, R. Modification of pole pitch and pole Arc in rotor magnets for cogging torque reduction in BLDC motor. IEEE Access. PP, 1. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3217233 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sahana, K. M. et al. Design, modelling and parametric analysis of a BLDC motor in E-Bike to predict torque range. Russ Electr. Eng. 94 (2), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068371223020098 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Koh, C. & Seop Yeon Jun mo BLDC interior permanent magnet typebldc motor with permanent magnet separation, South Korea, Patent KR20180001007A, January 4, (2018).

  26. Moon Sanghoon, K. H. et al. Rotor of interior permanent magnet Motor, South Korea. Patent EP 2889987A2, July 1 (2015).

  27. Tripathy, S. N., Kundu, S., Pradhan, A. & Samal, P. Optimal design of a BLDC motor using African Vulture optimization algorithm, e-Prime -. Adv. Electr. Eng. Electron. Energy. 7 (100499), 2772–6711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prime.2024.100499 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cetin, E. & Daldaban, F. Analyzing distinctive rotor Poles of the axial flux PM motors by using 3D-FEA in view of the magnetic equivalent circuit. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 20 (5), 1421–1429 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bapiri, M. & Vahedi, A. Improving performance of ring-winding axial flux permanent magnet motor based on harmonic analysis approach. Electr. Eng. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-025-03051-5 (2025).

  30. Li, S., Wang, L. & Bao, X. An asymmetric rotor interior permanent magnet mechanical design considering operating conditions. Electr. Eng. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-025-03033-7 (2025).

  31. Xu, Z. et al. Noise suppression and cogging torque optimization in external rotor permanent magnet synchronous motor. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2025.3613989 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tabassum, A. A., Cho, H. M. & Mahmud, M. I. Essential features and torque minimization techniques for brushless direct current motor controllers in electric vehicles. Energies. 17 (18). https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184562 (2024).

  33. Ziemiański, D., Chwalik-Pilszyk, G. & Dudzik, G. Analysis of stator material influence on BLDC motor performance. Materials 18 (19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma18194630 (2025).

  34. Ye, X., Zeng, Q., Sun, R. & Zhang, T. Torque optimization strategy for outer rotor permanent magnet brushless DC motor based on metamodel and CRITIC–TOPSIS method. Electr. Eng. 107 (2), 1643–1658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-024-02607-1 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ghanizadeh, R., Mohammadi, T. & Razavi, F. Optimized design and performance enhancement of concentrated winding BLDC motors for aircraft actuators. J. Oper. Autom. Power Eng. https://doi.org/10.22098/joape.2025.15488.2190 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J.Pyrhönen, T., Jokinen & Hrabovcova, V. Design of Rotating Electrical Machines (Wiley, 2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118701591

  37. Garip, S. & Yasa, Y. Design of outer runner-type brushless permanent magnet DC motor for lightweight e-vehicles. In Proc.—2020 6th Int. Conf. Electr. Power Energy Convers. Syst. EPECS 2020, 151–156. https://doi.org/10.1109/EPECS48981.2020.9304967 (2020).

  38. Krause, P. C., Wasynczuk, O. & Scott, D. S. Analysis of Electric Machinery and Drive Systems, 3rd edn (Wiley-IEEE Press, 2013).

  39. Hendershot, J. R. & Miller, T. J. E. Design of Brushless Permanent Magnet Machines (Motor Design Books, 2010).

  40. Miller, T. J. E. Brushless Permanent-Magnet and Reluctance Motor Drives (Oxford University Press, 1989).

  41. Juliani, A. D. et al. Magnetic field analysis of a brushless DC motor. In 2008 18th Int. Conf. On Electrical Machines. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICELMACH.2008.4800146 (IEEE, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  42. He, C. & Wu, T. Permanent magnet brushless DC motor and mechanical structure design for the electric impact wrench system. Energies. 11(6), 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11061360 (2018).

  43. Thenmozhi, G., Sivakumar, S., Arun, B., Nirmala, M. & Radhika, A. An investigation on the performance of permanent magnet brushless DC motor based on different materials. In AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2446, No. 1 (AIP Publishing, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0108137

  44. Sawhney, A. K. A Course in Electrical Machine Design (Dhanpat Rai & co. In ed: Publications, 1999).

  45. Abbaszadeh, K., Rezaee Alam, F. & Teshnehlab, M. Slot opening optimization of surface mounted permanent magnet motor for cogging torque reduction. Energy. Conv. Manag. 55, 108–115 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Shuaibu, I. et al. Advancements in axial flux permanent magnet machines utilizing coreless technology: A systematic review. Ain Shams Eng. J. 103091 (2024).

  47. Jo et al. Optimal design of a BLDC motor considering three-dimensional structures using the response surface methodology. Energies 15 (2), 461 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Kumaraguru College of Technology for providing permission to use the MotorSolve simulation software utilized in this study.

Funding

The authors did not receive any funds for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Thiagarajar College of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India

    V. Chandra & P. S. Manoharan

  2. Department of Automobile Engineering, Kumaraguru College of Technology, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

    G. Thenmozhi

  3. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, AAA College of Engineering and Technology, Sivakasi, Tamil Nadu, India

    J. Hemalatha

Authors
  1. V. Chandra
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. P. S. Manoharan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. Thenmozhi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Hemalatha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization: V.C. Data curation: V.C. Investigation: P.S.M., G.T. Methodology: V.C. Project administration: P.S.M., G.T. Supervision: P.S.M., Validation: P.S.M., J.H. Writing-original draft: V.C.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Chandra.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chandra, V., Manoharan, P.S., Thenmozhi, G. et al. Investigation of magnetic orientation effects on interior rotor BLDC motor performance for EVs: a response surface methodology approach. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37981-2

Download citation

  • Received: 06 December 2025

  • Accepted: 28 January 2026

  • Published: 02 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37981-2

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • CGT
  • Electric vehicle
  • Interior rotor
  • RSM
  • Magnet orientation
  • Skew angle
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing