Table 2 The model input data is shown and used to predict the actual patient post treatment data. Shown are the means, standard deviations (Std.), interquartile ranges (Q1-Q3), minimum values (Min), and maximum values (Max). Fit type :1) normal fit is lordosis is within 20% of the value of the SBA; 2) low fit type is a greater than 20% difference between the SBA and lordosis with SBA < 15°; 2) high fit type is a greater than 20% difference between the SBA and lordosis with SBA > 15°.

From: Machine learning models for predicting treatment outcomes in chronic non-specific back pain patients undergoing lumbar extension traction

Model input data

Post treatment data

  

Initial lumbar curve (°)

Initial SBA (°)

Initial ODI raw score out of 50 and (%)

Initial NRS pain

Frequency of traction

Duration of traction

Age

BMI

Compliance (%)

Lumbar curve (°)

NRS Pain

ODI Raw score out of 50 and (%)

Initial Lumbar curve fit relative to the SBA

1) Normal fit

N = 152

2) Low fit

N = 136

3) High fit

N = 143

Mean

11.5

14.5

16.6 (33.2%)

7.3

4.1

7.6

37.5

24.7

92.4

23.6

3.31

5.2 (10.4%)

Std

5.5

4.5

4.2 (8.4%)

1.1

1.2

2.1

8.1

4.8

6.1

4.7

0.9

3

Interquartile ranges. Minimum and maximum for variables

25%1

8

11

13

6

3

6

33

20

89

20

3

3

50%2

11

14

16

8

4

8

39

24

90

24

3

5

75%3

14.5

18

20

8

5

10

44

29

99

25

3

7

Min

0

5

8

4

3

4

19

17

70

12

0

0

Max

24

25

25

9

6

10

60

39

100

34

5

10

Percentage of patients achieving the MCIC of the questionnaires post treatment4

 

80.3%

1. 95.3%

2. 53%

  1. 125% Q1 first quartile: This is the value below which 25% of the data falls. It represents the lower boundary of the middle 50% of the dataset.
  2. 250% Q2 second quartile Q3 - Q1: This shows the range where the middle 50% of data lies.
  3. 375% Q3 third quartile: This is the value below which 75% of the data falls. It represents the upper boundary of the middle 50% of the dataset.
  4. 4MCIC values: NRS is improved by ≥ 2; ODI is improved when comparing the raw score at baseline minus the raw score at follow up the difference is: (1) Total % change is ≥ 12%; (2) Total % change is ≥ 24%.