Table 6 Comparison of the proposed method with state-of-the-art methods in HOMOMO, Roboflow, and YouTube datasets.

From: Integrating simplified Swin-T with modified EFS-Net for attention-guided underwater pipelines segmentation in complex underwater environments

Method

Datasets

Criteria

HOMOMO

Roboflow

YouTube

Proposed

mIoU

98.44%

85.4%

81.32%

Mean accuracy

99.5%

94.6%

93.0%

Mean precision

98.98%

86.98%

85.73%

Mean recall

98.52%

86.76%

84.76%

Mean specificity

99.1%

87.36%

85.41%

Mean F-score

98.74%

86.86%

85.24%

Mean F-boundary

82.01%

75.99%

70.01%

Mean test time (s)

0.011

0.018

0.012

DeeplabV3(ResNet101)18

mIoU

84.23%

68.5%

61.9%

Mean accuracy

88.21%

87.2%

86.15%

Mean precision

86.98%

73.32%

70.1%

Mean recall

86.22%

72.98%

69%

Mean specificity

86.83%

73.60%

70.08%

Mean F-score

86.59%

73.14%

69.54%

Mean F-boundary

71.23%

53.54%

51.02%

Mean test time (s)

0.025

0.026

0.024

U-Net18

mIoU

82.10%

50.3%

48.45%

Mean accuracy

86.90%

83.4%

82.71%

Mean precision

86.20%

67.13%

59.98%

Mean recall

84.99%

65.34%

58.18%

Mean specificity

85.60%

66.43%

59.12%

Mean F-score

85.59%

66.22%

59.06%

Mean F-boundary

69.10%

41.93%

41.23%

Mean test time (s)

0.043

0.039

0.040

Mask2Former53

mIoU

87.11%

69.14%

70.43%

Mean accuracy

89.78%

87.18%

86.41%

Mean precision

88.14%

77.25%

74.01%

Mean recall

87.59%

75.12%

73.16%

Mean specificity

88.15%

76.71%

74.31%

Mean F-score

87.84%

76.17%

73.58%

Mean F-boundary

70.2%

56.18%

57.31%

Mean test time (s)

0.030

0.031

0.029

SwinUNet54

mIoU

90.01%

72.19%

71.31%

Mean accuracy

91.13%

88.34%

87.12%

Mean precision

90.39%

74.65%

73.03%

Mean recall

90.23%

72.49%

72.12%

Mean specificity

90.96%

73.11%

73.07%

Mean F-score

90.31%

73.55%

72.57%

Mean F-boundary

74.41%

58.98%

60.71%

Mean test time (s)

0.033

0.032

0.31

TransUNet55

mIoU

88.78%

71.43%

72.1%

Mean accuracy

88.99%

88.98%

89.11%

Mean precision

88.91%

73.67%

73.26%

Mean recall

88.86%

72.98%

73.19%

Mean specificity

88.93%

73.14%

74.38%

Mean F-score

88.88%

73.32%

73.22%

Mean F-boundary

76.67%

60.34%

59.98%

Mean test time (s)

0.036

0.0321

0.032

YOLOv519

mIoU

80.02%

61.27%

60.94%

Mean accuracy

87.02%

80.63%

83.45%

Mean precision

86.14%

70.34%

69.91%

Mean recall

84.31%

69.76%

69.32%

Mean specificity

84.90%

70.58%

70.1%

Mean F-score

85.21%

70.04%

69.61%

Mean F-boundary

63.12%

54.11%

58.43%

Mean test time (s)

0.004

0.006

0.006

YOLOv1156

mIoU

82.96%

62.78%

63.01%

Mean accuracy

89.62%

83.03%

85.14%

Mean precision

89.14%

72.78%

72.44%

Mean recall

87.21%

71.44%

70.99%

Mean specificity

87.85%

72.23%

71.97%

Mean F-score

88.16%

72.10%

71.70%

Mean F-boundary

68.13%

55.91%

57.87%

Mean test time (s)

0.0029

0.0025

0.0029

YOLOv1256

mIoU

81.12%

63.01%

62.11%

Mean accuracy

89.43%

83.13%

85.41%

Mean precision

88.14%

72.65%

73.06%

Mean recall

79.87%

68.03%

68.31%

Mean specificity

80.12%

69.17%

69.48%

Mean F-score

83.80%

70.46%

70.60%

Mean F-boundary

66.43%

55.44%

59.98%

Mean test time (s)

0.0032

00.29

00.30