Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Analysis of the long-term sealing integrity of cement sheath in CO2 storage wells
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 February 2026

Analysis of the long-term sealing integrity of cement sheath in CO2 storage wells

  • Kaide Zhao1,2,3,
  • Shuangjin Zheng1,2,3,
  • Hu Meng1,2,3,
  • Zhijie Ren4,
  • Yun Zou5 &
  • …
  • Dengwei Fu6 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Energy science and technology
  • Engineering
  • Materials science

Abstract

CO2 geological storage is widely regarded as one of the most technically mature and large-scale options for emissions reduction within CCUS (Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage) technologies. However, CO2 corrosion and long-term injection/storage operations pose significant threats to the sealing integrity of cement sheaths in wellbores. Existing studies predominantly rely on numerical simulations to analyze the mechanical response on cement sheath under temperature–pressure conditions, neglecting the corrosion of cement sheath. However, there is a notable lack of theoretical computation models specifically for cement sheaths containing the coupled effects of corrosion and stress. This study establishes a mechanical model of the casing-CCS (corroded cement sheath)-formation assembly based on elastoplastic theory, incorporating thick-walled cylinder theory and the Mohr–Coulomb criterion. The model is solved using MATLAB to quantify the stress-displacement response of CCS during injection and storage. Results indicate that CO2 corrosion significantly increases the complexity of the stress state in the cement sheath and the risk of sealing failure. For a representative injection pressure of 60 MPa, introducing a 5 mm corroded layer increases the predicted micro-annulus aperture at the primary casing-cement interface from 0.0238 mm to 0.0519 mm after unloading (an increase of 118%). When the injection pressure varies from 40 to 100 MPa, the micro-annulus aperture grows from 0.0211 mm to 0.1113 mm, whereas increasing the CSCL thickness from 5 to 30 mm only enlarges it from 0.0519 mm to 0.0579 mm (11.5%). In contrast, increasing casing wall thickness from 7.5 mm to 17.5 mm reduces the maximum radial stress in the cement sheath from -28.88 MPa to -18.68 MPa and decreases the micro-annulus aperture from 0.1829 mm to 0.0413 mm. This study provides a theoretical foundation for optimizing wellbore design in CCUS projects.

Similar content being viewed by others

Effects of confined thermal cycling on sealants with different thermomechanical properties for CCS

Article Open access 17 September 2025

Evaluating CO2 breakthrough in a shaly caprock material: a multi-scale experimental approach

Article Open access 23 June 2022

Assessment of chemo-mechanical impacts of CO2 sequestration on the caprock formation in Farnsworth oil field, Texas

Article Open access 29 July 2022

Data availability

Data available on request from the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CCUS:

Carbon capture, utilization and storage

CCS:

Corroded cement sheath

CSCL:

Cement sheath corroded layer

CSIL:

Cement sheath intact layer

References

  1. Dai, S., Liao, T. & Wu, Y. Progress of CO2 geological storage research, policy development and suggestions in China. Carbon Manag. 16, 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2025.2485104 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Li, X. & Fang, Z. Status quo of connection technologies of CO2 geological storage in China. Rock Soil Mech. 28, 2229 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Du, J., Zhou, A., Zhong, Y. & Shen, S. Molecular simulation on CO2 adsorption heterogeneity in montmorillonite nanopores with different surface charges in presence of water. Chem. Eng. J. 482, 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2024.148958 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leung, D., Caramanna, G. & Maroto-Valer, M. An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 39, 426–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bachu, S. Sequestration of CO2 in geological media: criteria and approach for site selection in response to climate change. Energy Convers. Manage. 41, 953–970. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-8904(99)00149-1 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  6. White, C., Strazisar, B., Granite, E., Hoffman, J. & Pennline, H. Separation and capture of CO2 from large stationary sources and sequestration in geological formations -: Coalbeds and deep saline aquifers. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 53, 645–715. https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466206 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hong, Z. et al. A quick method for appraising pore connectivity and ultimate imbibed porosity in shale reservoirs. J. Marine Sci. Eng. 13, 174 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meng, M. et al. Rock Fabric of Lacustrine Shale and Its Influence on Residual Oil Distribution in the Upper Cretaceous Qingshankou Formation Songliao Basin. Energy Fuels 37, 7151–7160. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c00527 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loizzo, M. et al. in 10th International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies. 5203–5210 (Elsevier Science Bv, 2011).

  10. Wang, D. et al. CO2 sequestration wells sealing evaluation model: Jimusar depression, China as an example. Geoenergy Sci. Eng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213439 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bai, M., Sun, J., Song, K., Reinicke, K. & Teodoriu, C. Evaluation of mechanical well integrity during CO2 underground storage. Environ. Earth Sci. 73, 6815–6825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4157-5 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, C. et al. A new method to protect the cementing sealing integrity of carbon dioxide geological storage well: An experiment and mechanism study. Eng. Fracture Mech. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.107213 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, J., Chen, Y., Liang, W., Zhang, S. & Qiu, Y. Experimental investigation on permeability and mechanical properties of cement-salt rock interface subjected to cyclic loading. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 56, 7281–7299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-023-03434-9 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, S. et al. Mechanical characteristics of well cement under cyclic loading and its influence on the integrity of shale gas wellbores. Fuel 250, 132–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.03.131 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Udebhulu, O., Aladeitan, Y., Azevedo, R. & De Tomi, G. A review of cement sheath integrity evaluation techniques for carbon dioxide storage. J. Petroleum Explor. Product. Technol. 14, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-023-01697-0 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Deng, K. et al. Failure mechanism and influencing factors of cement sheath integrity under alternating pressure. Pet. Sci. 20, 2413–2427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2023.03.004 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chu, W., Shen, J., Yang, Y., Li, Y. & Gao, D. Calculation of micro-annulus size in casing-cement sheath-formation system under continuous internal casing pressure change. Pet. Explor. Dev. 42, 414–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1876-3804(15)30033-1 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang, X. et al. Study on the sealing integrity of cement sheath under cyclic internal pressure considering temperature effects. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213761 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, H., Shen, R., Yuan, G., Ba, Z. & Hu, Y. Cement sheath integrity analysis of underground gas storage well based on elastoplastic theory. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 159, 818–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.012 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Xi, Y., Lian, W., Fan, L., Tao, Q. & Guo, X. Research and engineering application of pre-stressed cementing technology for preventing micro-annulus caused by cyclic loading-unloading in deep shale gas horizontal wells. J. Petroleum Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108359 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zhou, S. et al. Study on the mechanism and controlling method for annulus pressure buildup problems in shale gas wells. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2023.212065 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Su, D. et al. Mechanical property design method of cement sheath in a horizontal shale oil well under fracturing conditions. Pet. Explor. Dev. 49, 919–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1876-3804(22)60321-5 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Su, D. et al. Sealing integrity evaluation and optimization of cement sheath-formation interface under different formation conditions during fracturing. J. Earth Sci. 36, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12583-023-1837-z (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou, N. et al. Damage behavior and constitutive model of cement sheath under alternating temperature. Geoenergy Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2025.213945 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Yuan, B., Luo, W., Xu, B. & Fan, H. A prediction model for carbonation depth of cement sheath of carbon capture utilization and storage (CCUS) wells. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104842 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kutchko, B., Strazisar, B., Lowry, G., Dzombak, D. & Thaulow, N. Rate of CO2 attack on hydrated Class H well cement under geologic sequestration conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 6237–6242. https://doi.org/10.1021/es800049r (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wu, Z., Wu, G. & Xing, X. Sealing integrity of cement sheath under the condition of CO2 corrosion-stress coupling. Drilling Fluid Completion Fluid. 41, 220–230 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gu, T. et al. Coupled effect of CO2 attack and tensile stress on well cement under CO2 storage conditions. Constr. Build. Mater. 130, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.10.117 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mei, K. et al. Effectiveness and microstructure change of alkali-activated materials during accelerated carbonation curing. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122063 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Li, Y., Tang, H., Wu, P. & Song, Y. Micro mechanical behavior and strain localization of oil well cement corroded by CO2. Constr. Build. Mater. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138371 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, H. et al. Application of ABAQUS Flow-Solid coupling model to evaluate sealing capability of sandstone formation interface based on the cracking behavior of cohesive force units. Constr. Build. Mater. 409, 19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133863 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Bu, Y. et al. Stress concentration of perforated cement sheath and the effect of cement sheath elastic parameters on its integrity failure during shale gas fracturing. Front. Mater. 9, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2022.980920 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. He, Y., Song, Y., Hu, S., Liu, H. & Ge, X. Mechanical evaluation of casing in multiple thermal recovery cycles for offshore heavy oil wells. J. Marine Sci. Eng. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse13030597 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 52404002), Open Fund of Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering (Yangtze University) (Grant No. YQZC202411).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hubei Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Drilling and Production Engineering, Yangtze University), Wuhan, 430100, China

    Kaide Zhao, Shuangjin Zheng & Hu Meng

  2. School of Petroleum Engineering, Yangtze University, Wuhan, 430100, China

    Kaide Zhao, Shuangjin Zheng & Hu Meng

  3. State Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Catalysis and Carbon Dioxide Utilization (Yangtze University), Wuhan, 430100, China

    Kaide Zhao, Shuangjin Zheng & Hu Meng

  4. Oil Production Technology Research Institute, PetroChina LIAOHE Oilfield Company, Panjin, 124010, China

    Zhijie Ren

  5. Golden Sea Oil Production Plant, PetroChina LIAOHE Oilfield Company, Panjin, 124010, China

    Yun Zou

  6. PetroChina Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay, 834000, China

    Dengwei Fu

Authors
  1. Kaide Zhao
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shuangjin Zheng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hu Meng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zhijie Ren
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yun Zou
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dengwei Fu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K.Z. and H.M analyzed most of the data and wrote the main manuscript text. S.Z. contributed the central idea, revised the first draft, and provided financial support. Z.R. and Y.Z assisted with the analysis of the model and results. D.F. prepared all figures. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuangjin Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, K., Zheng, S., Meng, H. et al. Analysis of the long-term sealing integrity of cement sheath in CO2 storage wells. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38242-y

Download citation

  • Received: 03 November 2025

  • Accepted: 29 January 2026

  • Published: 13 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38242-y

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Corroded cement sheath
  • CCUS
  • CO2 corrosion
  • Sealing integrity
  • Micro-annulus
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing