Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and associated factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared with ovulatory controls
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 04 February 2026

24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and associated factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared with ovulatory controls

  • Maria de Fátima Azevedo1,2,
  • Ana Kleyce Coreia Rocha3,
  • Livia Maria Bezerra de Melo4,
  • Luciana Medeiros Bezerra de Melo5,
  • Romena Leão Azevedo Catão6 &
  • …
  • Eduardo Caldas Costa7 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Biomarkers
  • Diseases
  • Endocrinology
  • Medical research
  • Physiology
  • Risk factors

Abstract

To compare 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) between women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and ovulatory controls, and to explore potential anthropometric, hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory correlates of ABP in women with PCOS. In this cross-sectional study, 50 women with PCOS (diagnosed by Rotterdam criteria) and 50 ovulatory controls underwent office and 24-hour ABP monitoring. Clinical, anthropometric, hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory parameters were assessed. Between-group comparisons were adjusted for body mass index (BMI). LASSO regression was used to identify variables independently associated with ABP in the PCOS group. Women with PCOS showed significantly higher 24-hour and daytime mean arterial pressure and heart rate compared to controls, even after adjustment for BMI (p < 0.05). No differences were observed in nighttime ABP or office blood pressure (p > 0.05). PCOS participants exhibited a more adverse cardiometabolic profile, including higher BMI, waist circumference, insulin, HbA1c, triglycerides, creatinine, and TNF-alfa, along with lower estradiol and progesterone levels. In LASSO models, BMI emerged as the only consistent independent predictor of ABP across all periods. Additional predictors, such as HbA1c (nighttime mean BP), creatinine (daytime diastolic BP), and waist circumference (daytime systolic BP), were retained in specific models, while most hormonal, metabolic, and inflammatory markers were not associated with ABP in the PCOS group. In summary, women with PCOS exhibit higher 24-hour and daytime ABP compared to ovulatory controls, independently of BMI. Adiposity, as assessed by BMI, appears to be a key factor associated with ABP in this population. These findings highlight the importance of 24-hour ABP monitoring and weight management in the cardiovascular risk assessment and care of women with PCOS.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

References

  1. Teede, H. J. et al. Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 110, 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.05.004 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Azziz, R. et al. The androgen excess and PCOS society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Fertil. Steril. 91, 456–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sprung, V. S. et al. Endothelial function measured using flow-mediated dilation in polycystic ovary syndrome: a meta‐analysis of the observational studies. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 78, 438–446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.2012.04490.x (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bril, F. et al. Adipose tissue dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 109, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad356 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lim, S. S. et al. Metabolic syndrome in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta‐regression. Obes. Rev. 20, 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12762 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wekker, V. et al. Long-term cardiometabolic disease risk in women with PCOS: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum. Reprod. Update. 26, 942–960. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmaa029 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tay, C. T. et al. 2023 International evidence-based polycystic ovary syndrome guideline update: insights from a systematic review and meta‐analysis on elevated clinical cardiovascular disease in polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 13 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033572 (2024).

  8. Berni, T. R., Morgan, C. L. & Rees, D. A. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome have an increased risk of major cardiovascular events: a population study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 106, e3369–e3380. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgab392 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Amiri, M., Ramezani Tehrani, F., Behboudi-Gandevani, S., Bidhendi-Yarandi, R. & Carmina, E. Risk of hypertension in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 18 (23). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00576-1 (2020).

  10. Wu, C. H. et al. Hypertension risk in young women with polycystic ovary syndrome: A nationwide population-based cohort study. Front. Med. 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2020.574651 (2020).

  11. Azevedo, M. F. & de Elevated blood pressure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: prevalence and associated risk factors. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. E Obs. 33, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-72032011000100005 (2011). CostaE.C.Oliveira, A.I.N.; Silva, I.B. de O.; Marinho, J.C.D.B.; Rodrigues, J.A.M.; Azevedo.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Macut, D. et al. Hypertension in polycystic ovary syndrome: novel insights. Curr. Hypertens. Rev. 16, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573402115666190531071422 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, W. Y. et al. Association of office and ambulatory blood pressure with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. JAMA 322, 409. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.9811 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, D. Y. et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, European guideline targets, and cardiovascular outcomes: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Eur. Heart J. 46, 2974–2987. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf220 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holte, J., Gennarelli, G., Berne, C., Bergh, T. & Lithell, H. Elevated ambulatory day-time blood pressure in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a sign of a pre-hypertensive state? Hum. Reprod. 11, 23–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019028 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sampson, M., Kong, C., Patel, A., Unwin, R. & Jacobs, H. S. Ambulatory blood pressure profiles and plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1) activity in lean women with and without the polycystic ovary syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf). 45, 623–629. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2265.1996.00863.x (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luque-Ramírez, M., Álvarez-Blasco, F., Mendieta-Azcona, C., Botella-Carretero, J. I. & Escobar-Morreale, H. F. Obesity is the major determinant of the abnormalities in blood pressure found in young women with the polycystic ovary syndrome. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 92, 2141–2148 (2007). 10.1210/jc.2007 – 0190.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Luque-Ramírez, M. et al. Office blood pressure, ambulatory blood pressure Monitoring, and echocardiographic abnormalities in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Hypertension 63, 624–629. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02468 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gui, J. & Wang, R. Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 35, 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.03.018 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Sá, J. C. F. et al. Analysis of heart rate variability in polycystic ovary syndrome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 27, 443–447. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2010.501881 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Soleimani, H. et al. Predictive accuracy of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring versus clinic blood pressure for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr. Hypertens. Rev. 21, 102–116. https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734021337639250203175636 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rotterdam, E. S. H. R. E. & ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Hum. Reprod. 19, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh098 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Grupo de Trabalho, M. A. P. A. & Grupo de Trabalho, M. R. P. A. V Brazilian guidelines for ambulatory monitoring of arterial pressure and III Brazilian guidelines for home monitoring of blood pressure. J. Bras. Nefrol. 33, 365–388. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-28002011000300013 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barroso, W. K. S. et al. Jr. et al. Brazilian guidelines of hypertension – 2020. Arq. Bras. Cardiol. 116, 516–658. https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20201238 (2021).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the PCOS and control women who volunteered to participate in this study and Professor PhD. George Dantas Azevedo.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Health Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

    Maria de Fátima Azevedo

  2. Department of Clinical Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

    Maria de Fátima Azevedo

  3. Residência em Nefrologia no Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

    Ana Kleyce Coreia Rocha

  4. Nefrologista do Hospital João Machado, Rio Grande Do Norte, Natal, Brazil

    Livia Maria Bezerra de Melo

  5. Médica Anestesiologista, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Santos, São Paulo, Brazil

    Luciana Medeiros Bezerra de Melo

  6. Residência em Ginecologia Obstetrícia no Hospital Geral de Itaparica da Serra- São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    Romena Leão Azevedo Catão

  7. ExCE Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Federal University of Rio Grande Do Norte, BR 101, Lagoa Nova, Natal, RN, 59078-970, Brazil

    Eduardo Caldas Costa

Authors
  1. Maria de Fátima Azevedo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ana Kleyce Coreia Rocha
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Livia Maria Bezerra de Melo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luciana Medeiros Bezerra de Melo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Romena Leão Azevedo Catão
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Eduardo Caldas Costa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MFA, GDA and ECC, conceptualization of research project; MFA, AKCR, LMBM, LMBM, and RLAC investigation and data curation; MFA and ECC formal analysis and main manuscript text; GDA and ECC, writing—Review & Editing. ECC, supervision; MFA, project administration; All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Caldas Costa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Fátima Azevedo, M., Rocha, A.K.C., de Melo, L.M.B. et al. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure and associated factors in women with polycystic ovary syndrome compared with ovulatory controls. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38731-0

Download citation

  • Received: 14 August 2025

  • Accepted: 30 January 2026

  • Published: 04 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38731-0

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Polycystic ovary syndrome
  • Blood pressure
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Cardiometabolic risk
  • Body mass index
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research