Table 1 Construct definitions and measurement.

From: Understanding college student’s continued intention in choirs through music quality and psychosocial influences

Construct

Conceptual definition

Operational focus

Key source(s)

Social group (SG)

The perceived cohesion, support, and shared identity within the choir

Sense of belonging, quality of social interactions, and mutual support among members

Lonsdale et al.31, Maury et al.54

Song’s content quality (SCQ)

The perceived artistic value, appropriateness, and appeal of the musical repertoire

Quality, variety, challenge, and meaningfulness of the songs performed

Weiss et al.35, Tu et al.36

Perceived self-efficacy (PSE)

An individual’s foundational knowledge and skill in understanding and engaging with music

Understanding of music theory, ability to read notation, and recognition of musical styles

Broomhead50, Lohmeyer52

Personal music literacy (PML)

The belief in one’s own capability to successfully perform tasks required in choir singing

Confidence in vocal accuracy, handling difficult techniques, and contributing to the group performance

Zhukov et al.39, Moore41

Perceived usefulness (PU)

The degree to which a student believes choir participation is beneficial for personal development

Enhancement of musical skills, personal growth, and future academic/career value

Bartolome42, Fernández-Herranz et al.45

Satisfaction (SAT)

The affective and cognitive evaluation of the overall choir experience

Fulfillment of expectations, contentment with rehearsals, performances, and social experience

Ardahan46, Radovčaj-Jerković47

Participation behavior (PB)

The behavioral intention and actual engagement in sustained choir activity

Active involvement in rehearsals/performances and intention to continue/recommend the choir

Clift et al.13, Maury et al.54