Table 6 Structural equation modeling path analysis results.

From: Understanding college student’s continued intention in choirs through music quality and psychosocial influences

Path (Hypothesis)

B (Estimate)

SE

β (Std. Est.)

95% CI lower

95% CI Upper

p value

Conclusion

H1: SCQ ← SG

0.362

0.062

0.36

0.241

0.483

< 0.001

Supported

H2: PSE ← SG

0.107

0.078

0.11

− 0.045

0.259

0.167

Not supported

H3: PSE ← SCQ

0.460

0.078

0.41

0.307

0.613

< 0.001

Supported

H5: PU ← PSE

0.297

0.060

0.30

0.179

0.415

< 0.001

Supported

H7: SAT ← PSE

0.436

0.055

0.44

0.328

0.544

< 0.001

Supported

H8: PB ← PU

0.296

0.057

0.30

0.184

0.408

< 0.001

Supported

H10: PB ← SAT

0.411

0.071

0.41

0.272

0.550

< 0.001

Supported

H6: PB ← PSE

0.033

0.055

0.03

− 0.075

0.141

0.554

Not supported

  1. SG Social Group, SCQ Song’s Content Quality, PSE Perceived Self-Efficacy, PU Perceived Usefulness, SAT Satisfaction, PB Participation Behavior.
  2. B = Unstandardized path coefficient; SE = Standard Error; β = Standardized path coefficient; CI = Confidence Interval.
  3. Significance codes: *** p < 0.001.
Back to article page