Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
In vitro and in vivo validation of a novel 3D-printed vessel anastomosis device for microvascular surgery
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 February 2026

In vitro and in vivo validation of a novel 3D-printed vessel anastomosis device for microvascular surgery

  • John Ser Pheng Loh1,2 na1,
  • Kuan-Che Feng1 na1,
  • Yijia Yuan1 na1,
  • Yinling Zhu3,
  • Robert Heymann2,6,
  • Lars Rasmusson5 na2,
  • Justin Kok Soon Tan3 na2,
  • Hwa Liang Leo3 na2 &
  • …
  • Reinhilde Jacobs2,4 na2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Engineering
  • Medical research

Abstract

Microvascular anastomosis is fundamental to free-flap reconstruction, yet hand-sutured techniques remain highly skill-dependent and prolong ischemic time, contributing to thrombosis and flap loss. Current suture-less devices accelerate anastomosis but are constrained by vessel-size mismatch, eversion-related intimal injury, and inconsistent arterial performance. A clinically adaptable, arterial-capable system is needed. We developed a customizable, 3D-printed intraluminal coupler with a snap-fit connection and elastic external clasp that avoids vessel eversion and preserves length. Devices were fabricated via SLA or PolyJet printing using clinically used resins. Benchtop evaluation included burst-pressure testing, tensile testing, wettability and endothelial cytocompatibility assays with oxygen-plasma surface modification. Deployment was assessed ex vivo using porcine coronary vessels and in vivo in a porcine carotid arterial model with patency monitoring over 4 h. Couplers sustained leakage pressures of ~ 90 mmHg vs. ~16 mmHg for hand-sutured controls (P < 0.01), while maintaining comparable mechanical strength (≈ 2–3 N). Plasma surface treatment reduced water contact angles (≈ 85°→≈60°) and tripled endothelial attachment, restoring confluent morphology. Ex vivo deployment achieved completion in 9.47 ± 1.20 min, a ~ 62.5% reduction vs. published suturing times. In vivo, couplers restored immediate perfusion with no leakage or thrombosis. This 3D-printed intraluminal coupler demonstrates mechanical feasibility, rapid deploy-ability, and surface-modifiable endothelial compatibility in benchtop and short-term large-animal feasibility testing, supporting its potential for further preclinical development as a vascular anastomosis technology. Future survival studies and anti-thrombogenic surface engineering will advance readiness for clinical implementation.

Data availability

Data and material sharing available on requests. Please contact the corresponding author johnloh@nus.edu.sg/john.ser.pheng.loh@ki.se.

References

  1. Papanikolaou, A. et al. Free tissue transfer in head and neck reconstruction: A multidisciplinary 15-year experience. Clin. Pract. 13(4), 820–829 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rickard, R. F. & Hudson, D. A. A history of vascular and microvascular surgery. Ann. Plast. Surg. 73(4), 465 –472 (2014).

  3. Dassonville, O. et al. Multicenter prospective micro-costing study evaluating mandibular free-flap reconstruction. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 274(2), 1103–1111 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ribaudo, J. G. et al. Sutureless vascular anastomotic approaches and their potential impacts. Bioact Mater. 38, 73–94 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito, G. et al. Present status and new perspectives in laser welding of vascular tissues. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents. 25(2), 145–152 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heitzer, M. et al. Evaluation of fibrin, cyanoacrylate, and polyurethane-based tissue adhesives in sutureless vascular anastomosis: a comparative mechanical ex vivo study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. (2023).

  7. Liu, S. Q. et al. Nonsuture anastomosis of arteries and veins using the magnetic pinned-ring device: a histologic and scanning electron microscopic study. Ann. Vasc Surg. 26(7), 985–995 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mudigonda, S. K., Murugan, S., Velavan, K., Thulasiraman, S. & Krishna Kumar Raja, V. B. Non-suturing microvascular anastomosis in maxillofacial reconstruction- a comparative study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 48(6), 599–606 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fitzgerald, E. et al. The microvascular anastomotic coupler for venous anastomoses in free flap breast reconstruction improves outcomes. Gland Surg. 5(2), 88–92 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lu, Q. et al. End-to-end vascular anastomosis using a novel magnetic compression device in rabbits: a preliminary study. Sci. Rep. 10(1), 5981 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klima, U. et al. Magnetic vascular port in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting. Circulation 110(11 Suppl 1), Ii55–60 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gurevitch, J. et al. Noninvasive evaluation of arterial grafts with newly released multidetector computed tomography. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 76(5), 1523–1527 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klima, U. et al. Magnetic vascular coupling for distal anastomosis in coronary artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 126(5), 1568–1574 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yakacki, C. M. et al. Unconstrained recovery characterization of shape-memory polymer networks for cardiovascular applications. Biomaterials 28(14), 2255–2263 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Baer, G. M. et al. Fabrication and in vitro deployment of a laser-activated shape memory polymer vascular stent. Biomed. Eng. Online. 6, 43 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crystal, D. T. et al. Efficacy of microsurgical venous couplers in lymphovenous anastomosis of the thoracic duct: an examination of outcomes and patency at follow-up. J. Reconstr. Microsurg. (2025).

  17. Vishwakarma, A. K. et al. Exploring the supremacy of microvascular coupling devices for arterial anastomosis in terms of added expeditiousness, safety concerns: A systematic review. J. Oral Biol. Craniofac. Res. 14(2), 116–125 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pafitanis, G., Cooper, L., Hadjiandreou, M., Ghanem, A. & Myers, S. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: A curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 72(2), 203–210 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Chernichenko, N. et al. Arterial coupling for microvascular free tissue transfer. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 138(5), 614–618 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Maruccia, M. et al. Microvascular coupler device versus hand-sewn venous anastomosis: A systematic review of the literature and data meta-analysis. Microsurgery 40(5), 608–617 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kafle, A. et al. 3D/4D printing of polymers: fused deposition modelling (FDM), selective laser sintering (SLS), and stereolithography (SLA). Polym. (Basel) 13(18) (2021).

  22. Kim, T. et al. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide. J. Prosthet. Dent. 124(2), 195–201e2 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Németh, A. et al. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis(). J. Dent. 134, 104532 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pandya, A. N., Vaingankar, N., Grant, I. & James, N. K. End-to-side venous anastomoses… a patency test. Br. J. Plast. Surg. 56(8), 810–811 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Van Look, L., Menovsky, T., Vissers, G., Tondu, T. & Thiessen, F. How to deal with an intraoperative thrombosis of microvascular anastomosis. Open. J. Mod. Neurosurg. 11(4), 281–295 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berggren, A., Ostrup, L. T. & Ragnarsson, R. Clinical experience with the Unilink/3 M precise microvascular anastomotic device. Scand. J. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Hand Surg. 27(1), 35–39 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bauer, F. et al. Microvascular anastomosis using modified micro-stents: a pilot in vivo study. J. Craniomaxillofac. Surg. 43(2), 204–207 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heitzer, M. et al. Evaluation of the long-term results of vascular anastomosis using polyurethane adhesive and shape-memory stent in the rat carotid artery model. Microsurgery 42(5), 480–489 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ardehali, B., Morritt, A. N. & Jain, A. Systematic review: anastomotic microvascular device. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 67(6), 752–755 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chung, J. H. et al. Recipient vessel selection for head and neck reconstruction: A 30-year experience in a single institution. Arch. Craniofac. Surg. 21(5), 269–275 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tan, S. H., Nguyen, N. T., Chua, Y. C. & Kang, T. G. Oxygen plasma treatment for reducing hydrophobicity of a sealed polydimethylsiloxane microchannel. Biomicrofluidics 4(3), 32204 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Neves, L. B. et al. A review of methods to modify the PDMS surface wettability and their applications. Micromachines (Basel). 15(6) (2024).

  33. Ruhoff, A. M. et al. Biomaterial wettability affects fibrin clot structure and fibrinolysis. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10(20), e2100988 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sava, R. I. et al. Diagnosis and management of inadvertent Iliac vein injury during structural heart interventions. JACC Case Rep. 30(3), 103096 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heidekrueger, P. et al. Comparison of venous couplers versus hand-sewn technique in 4577 cases of DIEP-flap breast reconstructions - A multicenter study. Microsurgery 42(1), 5–12 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Fletcher, D., Edwards, D., Tolchard, S., Baker, R. & Berstock, J. Improving theatre turnaround time. BMJ Qual. Improv. Rep. 6(1) (2017).

  37. Gürlek, A., Kroll, S. S. & Schusterman, M. A. Ischemic time and free flap success. Ann. Plast. Surg. 38(5), 503–505 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Ms Nurazreen Binte Mohamed Zaid (Senior Manager, Dean’s Office, National University of Singapore, Dentistry) and Mr Chua Wei Chieh (Research Engineer , Technology Transfer & Innovation, National Uninversity of Singapore) for their patience, invaluable advice and support and most of all, friendship. We also thank Dr Diego Pitta de Araujo, PhD (National University Healthcare System, Singapore) for the artwork and illustrations in the manuscript.

Funding

Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. Principal Investigator John Ser Pheng Loh, National University Health System Seed Fund, Singapore (NUHSRO/2024/014/RO5 + 6/Seed-Sep23/07). Principal Investigator, John Ser Pheng Loh, National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster Full Project Funding, Singapore, M23N2K0033.

Author information

Author notes
  1. John Ser Pheng Loh, Kuan-Che Feng and Yijia Yuan contributed equally to this work.

  2. These authors jointly supervised this work: Lars Rasmusson, Justin Kok Soon Tan, Hwa Liang Leo and Reinhilde Jacobs.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Dentistry, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore

    John Ser Pheng Loh, Kuan-Che Feng & Yijia Yuan

  2. Department of Dental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    John Ser Pheng Loh, Robert Heymann & Reinhilde Jacobs

  3. Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore (NUS), Singapore, Singapore

    Yinling Zhu, Justin Kok Soon Tan & Hwa Liang Leo

  4. OMS-IMPATH Research Group, KU Leuven, Brussels, Belgium

    Reinhilde Jacobs

  5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Odontology Section 1, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

    Lars Rasmusson

  6. Section för Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

    Robert Heymann

Authors
  1. John Ser Pheng Loh
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kuan-Che Feng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yijia Yuan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yinling Zhu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Robert Heymann
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lars Rasmusson
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Justin Kok Soon Tan
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Hwa Liang Leo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Reinhilde Jacobs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

**JSPL, JKST and YY: ** Conceptualization; supervision; project administration; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing., **KCF, ZY** : Conceptualization, Project administration; visualization; writing. **RH, LR, JKST, HLL, RJ** : project administration; supervision; writing – review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Ser Pheng Loh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Loh, J.S.P., Feng, KC., Yuan, Y. et al. In vitro and in vivo validation of a novel 3D-printed vessel anastomosis device for microvascular surgery. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39181-4

Download citation

  • Received: 17 November 2025

  • Accepted: 03 February 2026

  • Published: 13 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39181-4

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Anastomosis
  • Coupler
  • Free tissue flap
  • Medical devices
  • Microsurgery
  • 3D printed
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing