Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Optimization of THP-1-CAR monocytes utilizing CD32a signaling phagocytosis for antigen-specific T cell activation
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 10 February 2026

Optimization of THP-1-CAR monocytes utilizing CD32a signaling phagocytosis for antigen-specific T cell activation

  • Jisu Hong1,2,
  • Soojin Lee1,
  • Youngju Kim1,2,
  • Chang Kyung Kang3,
  • Wan Beom Park3,
  • Hyun Mu Shin1,4,5,
  • Hang-Rae Kim6,7 na1 &
  • …
  • Chang-Han Lee1,2,4,5,8 na1 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 960 Accesses

  • 2 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Antigen processing and presentation
  • Cell therapies
  • Monocytes and macrophages

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) are emerging as a next-generation cellular modality for therapies ranging from viral infection to solid tumors, leveraging innate phagocytic and antigen-presenting functions. Here, we compared CAR constructs incorporating intracellular signaling domains (ICDs) derived from CD3ζ, Fc gamma receptor IIa (CD32a), complement receptor 3 (CR3), and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in THP-1-derived monocytes and macrophages. Using an anti-viral SARS-CoV-2 model as a screening platform, we subsequently validated key findings in an anti-tumor mesothelin (MSLN) model. Results indicated that CARCD32a exhibited superior phagocytic capacity compared with CARCD3ζ in both monocytes and macrophages. While combining CR3 (CD11b and CD18) and CD32a domains did not enhance phagocytosis, it significantly increased the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α). The incorporation of TLR4 signaling domain reduced surface CAR expression and phagocytic capacity but markedly increased inflammatory cytokine induction, suggesting that TLR4-driven cytokine production can be enhanced despite diminished phagocytosis in this setting. Furthermore, following phagocytosis, CAR-monocytes induced antigen-specific CD8+ T cell activation via antigen presentation. Collectively, these findings highlight CD32a-based and combinatorial ICD designs as a framework for functionally tuned CAR-M platform for solid tumor immunotherapy and anti-viral applications.

Similar content being viewed by others

A second-generation M1-polarized CAR macrophage with antitumor efficacy

Article 27 November 2023

CAR macrophages with built-In CD47 blocker combat tumor antigen heterogeneity and activate T cells via cross-presentation

Article Open access 30 April 2025

Screening for CD19-specific chimaeric antigen receptors with enhanced signalling via a barcoded library of intracellular domains

Article 16 June 2022

Data availability

All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Pan, K. et al. CAR race to cancer immunotherapy: from CAR T, CAR NK to CAR macrophage therapy. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 41, 119 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hou, Y. et al. Beyond CAR-T cells: exploring CAR-NK, CAR-M, and CAR-γδ T strategies in solid tumor immunotherapy. Front. Immunol. 16, 1675807 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, Y. et al. Developing CAR-immune cell therapy against SARS-CoV-2: current status, challenges and prospects. Biochem. Pharmacol. 222, 116066 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wu, D. et al. CAR T-cell therapy in autoimmune diseases: a promising frontier on the horizon. Front. Immunol. 16, 1613878 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gao, J. et al. Efficacy and safety of allogeneic CD19 CAR NK-cell therapy in systemic lupus erythematosus: a case series in China. Lancet 406, 2968–2979 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cao, Q. et al. Targeting inflammation with chimeric antigen receptor macrophages using a signal switch. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 9, 1502–1516 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, J., Liu, C., Zhang, P., Shen, L. & Qi, C. Optimizing CAR T cell therapy for solid tumours: a clinical perspective. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 22, 953–968 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li, T. et al. CAR-NK cells for cancer immunotherapy: recent advances and future directions. Front. Immunol. 15, 1361194 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Alrehaili, M., Couto, P. S., Khalife, R. & Rafiq, Q. A. CAR-macrophages in solid tumors: promise, progress, and prospects. Npj Precis Onc. 9, 382 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khan, A. N., Asija, S., Pendhari, J. & Purwar, R. CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies: where are we now and where are we heading for? Eur. J. Haematol. 112, 6–18 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X., Zhu, L., Zhang, H., Chen, S. & Xiao, Y. CAR-T cell therapy in hematological malignancies: current opportunities and challenges. Front. Immunol. 13, 927153 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shi, Y. et al. Exploring the potential of CAR-macrophage therapy. Life Sci. 361, 123300 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fu, W. et al. CAR macrophages for SARS-CoV-2 immunotherapy. Front Immunol 12, (2021).

  14. Lei, A. et al. A second-generation M1-polarized CAR macrophage with antitumor efficacy. Nat. Immunol. 25, 102–116 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, H. et al. Silencing of SIRPα enhances the antitumor efficacy of CAR-M in solid tumors. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 21, 1335–1349 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Freeman, S. A. & Grinstein, S. Phagocytosis: receptors, signal integration, and the cytoskeleton. Immunol. Rev. 262, 193–215 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, S. et al. Macrophages in immunoregulation and therapeutics. Sig Transduct. Target. Ther. 8, 207 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mantovani, A., Allavena, P., Marchesi, F. & Garlanda, C. Macrophages as tools and targets in cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 21, 799–820 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Muntjewerff, E. M. & Meesters, L. D. & van den Bogaart, G. Antigen Cross-Presentation by macrophages. Front Immunol 11, (2020).

  20. Klichinsky, M. et al. Human chimeric antigen receptor macrophages for cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 947–953 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gao, Z. et al. Targeting cardiac fibrosis with chimeric antigen receptor macrophages. Cell. Discov. 10, 86 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wang, J. et al. CAR-Macrophage therapy alleviates myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion injury. Circul. Res. 135, 1161–1174 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pierini, S. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-M) sensitize HER2 + solid tumors to PD1 Blockade in pre-clinical models. Nat. Commun. 16, 706 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Reiss, K. A. et al. CAR-macrophage therapy for HER2-overexpressing advanced solid tumors: a phase 1 trial. Nat. Med. 31, 1171–1182 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huang, T., Bei, C., Hu, Z. & Li, Y. CAR-macrophage: breaking new ground in cellular immunotherapy. Front. Cell. Dev. Biol. 12, 1464218 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Liu, M. et al. CAR-Macrophages and CAR-T cells synergistically kill tumor cells in vitro. Cells 11, 3692 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hadiloo, K., Taremi, S., Heidari, M. & Esmaeilzadeh, A. The CAR macrophage cells, a novel generation of chimeric antigen-based approach against solid tumors. Biomark. Res. 11, 103 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kloosterman, D. J. & Akkari, L. Macrophages at the interface of the co-evolving cancer ecosystem. Cell 186, 1627–1651 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Duan, Z. & Luo, Y. Targeting macrophages in cancer immunotherapy. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 6, 127 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Duan, Z., Li, Z., Wang, Z., Chen, C. & Luo, Y. Chimeric antigen receptor macrophages activated through TLR4 or IFN-γ receptors suppress breast cancer growth by targeting VEGFR2. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 72, 3243–3257 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Walbaum, S. et al. Complement receptor 3 mediates both sinking phagocytosis and phagocytic cup formation via distinct mechanisms. J. Biol. Chem. 296, 100256 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  32. McInturff, J. E., Modlin, R. L. & Kim, J. The role of Toll-like receptors in the pathogenesis and treatment of dermatological disease. J. Invest. Dermatology. 125, 1–8 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sharma, V., Sharma, P. & Singh, T. G. Mechanistic insights on TLR-4 mediated inflammatory pathway in neurodegenerative diseases. Pharmacol. Rep. 76, 679–692 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Clevers, H., Alarcon, B., Wileman, T. & Terhorst, C. The T cell receptor/CD3 complex: a dynamic protein ensemble. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 6, 629–662 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bettini, M. L. et al. Cutting edge: CD3 ITAM diversity is required for optimal TCR signaling and thymocyte development. J. Immunol. 199, 1555–1560 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Anania, J. C., Chenoweth, A. M., Wines, B. D. & Hogarth, P. M. The human FcγRII (CD32) family of leukocyte FcR in health and disease. Front Immunol 10, (2019).

  38. Hickman, E. et al. Expanded characterization of in vitro polarized M0, M1, and M2 human monocyte-derived macrophages: bioenergetic and secreted mediator profiles. PLOS ONE. 18, e0279037 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Suleimanov, S. K. et al. Radical-Generating Activity, Phagocytosis, and mechanical properties of four phenotypes of human macrophages. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 25, 1860 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Affandi, A. J. et al. CD169 defines activated CD14 + Monocytes with enhanced CD8 + T cell activation capacity. Front Immunol 12, (2021).

  41. Brossart, P. The role of antigen spreading in the efficacy of immunotherapies. Clin. Cancer Res. 26, 4442–4447 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Gulley, J. L. et al. Role of antigen spread and distinctive characteristics of immunotherapy in cancer treatment. JNCI: J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 109, djw261 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Liang, Y., Xu, Q. & Gao, Q. Advancing CAR-based immunotherapies in solid tumors: CAR- macrophages and neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 14, 1291619 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lu, J. et al. CAR macrophages: a promising novel immunotherapy for solid tumors and beyond. Biomark. Res. 12, 86 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Saha, S. et al. High expression of mesothelin in plasma and tissue is associated with poor prognosis and promotes invasion and metastasis in gastric cancer. Adv. Cancer Biology - Metastasis. 7, 100098 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Lv, J. & Li, P. Mesothelin as a biomarker for targeted therapy. Biomark. Res. 7, 18 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Faust, J. R., Hamill, D., Kolb, E. A., Gopalakrishnapillai, A. & Barwe, S. P. Mesothelin: an immunotherapeutic target beyond solid tumors. Cancers 14, 1550 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Chung, J. Y. et al. Rapid CAR Screening and circRNA-driven CAR-NK Cells for Persistent Shed-resistant Immunotherapy. 08.19.671003 Preprint at (2025). https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.08.19.671003 (2025).

  49. Chowdhury, P. S., Viner, J. L., Beers, R. & Pastan, I. Isolation of a high-affinity stable single-chain Fv specific for mesothelin from DNA-immunized mice by phage display and construction of a recombinant immunotoxin with anti-tumor activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 95, 669–674 (1998).

  50. Chowdhury, P. S. & Pastan, I. Improving antibody affinity by mimicking somatic hypermutation in vitro. Nat. Biotechnol. 17, 568–572 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Lucas, M., Zhang, X., Prasanna, V. & Mosser, D. M. ERK activation following macrophage FcγR ligation leads to chromatin modifications at the IL-10 Locus1. J. Immunol. 175, 469–477 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Li, J., Chen, P. & Ma, W. The next frontier in immunotherapy: potential and challenges of CAR-macrophages. Experimental Hematol. Oncol. 13, 76 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Morva, A., Arroyo, A. B., Andreeva, L. & Tapia-Abellán, A. Luengo-Gil, G. Unleashing the power of CAR-M therapy in solid tumors: a comprehensive review. Front. Immunol. 16, 1615760 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Huo, Y. et al. M1 polarization enhances the antitumor activity of chimeric antigen receptor macrophages in solid tumors. J. Transl Med. 21, 225 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhang, W. et al. Macrophage polarization in the tumor microenvironment: emerging roles and therapeutic potentials. Biomed. Pharmacother. 177, 116930 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sterner, R. C. & Sterner, R. M. CAR-T cell therapy: current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 11, 69 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Feucht, J. et al. Calibration of CAR activation potential directs alternative T cell fates and therapeutic potency. Nat. Med. 25, 82–88 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ciesielska, A., Matyjek, M. & Kwiatkowska, K. TLR4 and CD14 trafficking and its influence on LPS-induced pro-inflammatory signaling. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 78, 1233–1261 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang, P. et al. Chimeric antigen receptor with novel intracellular modules improves antitumor performance of T cells. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 10, 20 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Genin, M., Clement, F., Fattaccioli, A., Raes, M. & Michiels, C. M1 and M2 macrophages derived from THP-1 cells differentially modulate the response of cancer cells to Etoposide. BMC Cancer. 15, 577 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lee, H. N. et al. Novel FRET-based immunological synapse biosensor for the prediction of chimeric antigen Receptor-T cell function. Small Methods. 9, 2401016 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Kang, C. K. et al. Broad humoral and cellular immunity elicited by one-dose mRNA vaccination 18 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection. BMC Med. 20, 181 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  63. He, J. et al. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 viral protein R (Vpr) arrests cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle by inhibiting p34cdc2 activity. J. Virol. 69, 6705–6711 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Connor, R. I., Chen, B. K., Choe, S. & Landau, N. R. Vpr is required for efficient replication of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 in mononuclear phagocytes. Virology 206, 935–944 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Kang, C. K. et al. Longitudinal analysis of human memory T-Cell response according to the severity of illness up to 8 months after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. J. Infect. Dis. 224, 39–48 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Kang, C. K. et al. Distinct immune response at 1 year Post-COVID-19 according to disease severity. Front. Immunol. 13, 830433 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

English grammar was reviewed and revised by ChatGPT, a language model developed by OpenAI in San Francisco, CA, USA.

Funding

This work was supported in part by the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University (to C.-H. L. and H.-R. Kim) and the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) & funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (RS-2021-NR056559 to H.-R. Kim, RS-2024-00440679 to C.-H.L.).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Hang-Rae Kim and Chang-Han Lee contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jisu Hong, Soojin Lee, Youngju Kim, Hyun Mu Shin & Chang-Han Lee

  2. Department of Pharmacology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Jisu Hong, Youngju Kim & Chang-Han Lee

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Chang Kyung Kang & Wan Beom Park

  4. Wide River Institute of Immunology, Seoul National University, Hongcheon, Republic of Korea

    Hyun Mu Shin & Chang-Han Lee

  5. BK21 FOUR Biomedical Science Project, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hyun Mu Shin & Chang-Han Lee

  6. Department of Health Sciences and Technology, Samsung Advanced Institute for Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hang-Rae Kim

  7. Samsung Precision Genome Medicine Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Hang-Rae Kim

  8. Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea

    Chang-Han Lee

Authors
  1. Jisu Hong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Soojin Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Youngju Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chang Kyung Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wan Beom Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hyun Mu Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Hang-Rae Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Chang-Han Lee
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.-H.L. and J.S.H. conceived and designed the project. J.S.H., S.J.L., and Y.J.K. performed the experiments. C.-H.L., H.R.K., and J.S.H. analyzed the data. C.-H.L., H.R.K., J.S.H., C.K.K., W.B.P., and H.M.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and approved its submission.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hang-Rae Kim or Chang-Han Lee.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hong, J., Lee, S., Kim, Y. et al. Optimization of THP-1-CAR monocytes utilizing CD32a signaling phagocytosis for antigen-specific T cell activation. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39406-6

Download citation

  • Received: 06 June 2025

  • Accepted: 04 February 2026

  • Published: 10 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39406-6

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing