Abstract
Sea turtles face significant threats from plastic ingestion, yet their behavioral responses to plastics remain poorly understood. We observed the responses of eight 4-year-old juvenile and twenty-seven 10-week-old post-hatchling captive-bred hawksbill turtles (Eretmochelys imbricata) to single-use plastic films with different colors and toughness, types commonly found in the digestive tracts of wild turtle carcasses. Each turtle’s biting or touching toward the introduced plastic item was recorded. Juveniles frequently bit or touched light-colored (transparent or white) packaging and plastic bags, black plastic bags, and yellow snack packaging, but ignored blue bottle labels. Their preference may reflect sensitivity to light colors (e.g., white), and to softer materials (i.e., plastic bags over packaging). These findings align with previous studies on sea turtle responses to undyed or dyed jellyfish (Rhopilema esculentum), and plastics in the digestive tracts of carcasses. However, post-hatchlings showed no significant differences in responses, likely due to limited prey recognition at an early life stage. This study represents the first assessment of sea turtle behavioral responses to single-use plastics as visual cues. While post-hatchlings may ingest plastic randomly, older turtles are vulnerable to light-colored, soft plastics, putting sea turtles at risk of plastic ingestion throughout all life stages. Action is needed for targeted management of high-risk debris.
Data availability
The data from the findings of this study are provided herein and in the Supplementary Material files. Raw data files are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
PlasticsEurope. Plastics – the fast Facts 2023. (2023).
Ioakeimidis, C., Galgani, F. & Papatheodorou, G. Occurrence of marine litter in the marine environment: A world panorama of floating and seafloor plastics. In Hazardous Chemicals Associated with Plastics in the Marine Environment (eds Takada, H. & Karapanagioti, H. K.) 93–120 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).
Serra-Goncalves, C., Lavers, J. L. & Bond, A. L. Global review of beach debris monitoring and future recommendations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53, 12158–12167. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b01424 (2019).
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). From Pollution to Solution: A global assessment of marine litter and plastic pollution. Nairobi. (2021).
Savoca, M. S. et al. Towards a North Pacific ocean long-term monitoring program for plastic pollution: a review and recommendations for plastic ingestion bioindicators. Environ. Pollut. 310, 119861. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119861 (2022).
Moon, Y. et al. What type of plastic do sea turtles in Korean waters mainly ingest? quantity, shape, color, size, polymer composition, and original usage. Environ. Pollut. 298, 118849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118849 (2022).
United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). Single-use plastics: A Roadmap for Sustainability. (2018).
Moon, Y., Shim, W. J. & Hong, S. H. Characteristics of plastic debris ingested by sea turtles: a comprehensive review. Ocean. Sci. J. 58, 31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12601-023-00124-z (2023).
Duncan, E. M. et al. Diet-related selectivity of macroplastic ingestion in green turtles (Chelonia mydas) in the Eastern mediterranean. Sci. Rep. 9 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-48086-4 (2019).
Schuyler, Q., Hardesty, B. D., Wilcox, C. & Townsend, K. To eat or not to eat? Debris selectivity by marine turtles. PLoS One. 7, e40884. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040884 (2012).
Narazaki, T., Sato, K., Abernathy, K. J., Marshall, G. J. & Miyazaki, N. Loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) use vision to forage on gelatinous prey in mid-water. PLoS One. 8, e66043. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066043 (2013).
Fukuoka, T. et al. The feeding habit of sea turtles influences their reaction to artificial marine debris. Sci. Rep. 6, 28015. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep28015 (2016).
Pfaller, J. B., Goforth, K. M., Gil, M. A., Savoca, M. S. & Lohmann, K. J. Odors from marine plastic debris elicit foraging behavior in sea turtles. Curr. Biol. 30, R213–R214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.071 (2020).
Noh, H. J., Moon, Y., Shim, W. J., Cho, E. V. & Hong, S. H. Experimental study on color and texture as cues for plastic debris ingestion by captive sea turtles. Mar. Pollut Bull. 200, 116055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.116055 (2024).
Baker, L., Edwards, W. & Pike, D. A. Sea turtle rehabilitation success increases with body size and differs among species. Endanger. Species Res. 29, 13–21. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00696 (2015).
Kim, I. H. et al. Movement patterns of juvenile loggerhead turtles (Caretta Caretta L. 1758) and green turtles (Chelonia Mydas L. 1758) hatched in captivity and released in the Korean waters. Anim 12, 2157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12162157 (2022).
Jang, Y. L. et al. Ship-based visual observation underestimates plastic debris in marine surface water. Mar. Pollut Bull. 209, 117245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2024.117245 (2024).
IUCN. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. http://www.iucnredlist.org/ (2024).
Jones, T. T. & Seminoff, J. A. Feeding biology: advances from field-based observations, physiological studies, and molecular techniques. In The Biology of Sea Turtles 3 (eds. Wyneken, J., Lohmann, K.J. & Musick, J.A.) 211–247. (CRC Press, 2013).
Percie du Sert. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18 (7), e3000410 (2020).
Swimmer, Y. et al. Food color and marine turtle feeding behavior: can blue bait reduce turtle bycatch in commercial fisheries? Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 295, 273–278. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps295273 (2005).
Levenson, D., Eckert, S., Crognale, M., Deegan, J. & Jacobs, G. Electroretinographic and genetic examination of sea turtle visual pigments, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (2006).
Bulla, A., Mahoney, A., Lee, V. M., Dumont, D. & Kovalanchik, L. The effect of preference assessment informed enriichment device colour on biting and foraging behaviour in loggerhead sea turtles. J. Zoo Aquar Res. 12, 232–242. https://doi.org/10.19227/jzar.v12i4.801 (2024).
Gammariello, R. T. & Dunbar, S. G. Thresholds of visible light detection in Hawksbill turtle (Eretmochelys imbricata) hatchlings. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 89, 104337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsma.2025.104337 (2025).
Fritsches, K. A. Australian loggerhead sea turtle hatchlings do not avoid yellow. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 45, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/10236244.2012.690576 (2012).
Hall, R. J., Robson, S. K. A. & Ariel, E. Colour vision of green turtle (Chelonia mydas) hatchlings: do they still prefer blue under water? PeerJ 6, e5572. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5572 (2018).
Burghardt, G. M. Of iguanas and dinosaurs: social behavior and communication in neonate reptiles. Am. Zool. 17, 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/17.1.177 (1977).
Davis, K. M. & Burghardt, G. M. Training and long-term memory of a novel food acquisition task in a turtle (Pseudemys nelsoni). Behav. Process. 75, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2007.02.021 (2007).
Mehta, R. S. Early experience shapes the development of behavioral repertoires of hatchling snakes. J. Ethol. 27, 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10164-008-0097-9 (2008).
Endres, C. S., Putman, N. F. & Lohmann, K. J. Perception of airborne odors by loggerhead sea turtles. J. Exp. Biol. 212, 3823–3827. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.033068 (2009).
Rönn, A. Sea turtles respond to waterborne odors to biofouled plastic, Senior Honors Thesis thesis, (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2021).
Yokota, K., Kiyota, M. & Okamura, H. Effect of bait species and color on sea turtle bycatch and fish catch in a pelagic longline fishery. Fish. Res. 97, 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2009.01.003 (2009).
Piovano, S., Farcomeni, A. & Giacoma, C. Do colours affect biting behaviour in loggerhead sea turtles? Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 25, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03949370.2012.711777 (2013).
Cho, E. et al. Artificial breeding of the Hawksbill turtle, Eretmochelys imbricata, in a captive facility in the Republic of Korea. Nat. Conserv. 58, 165–181. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.58.143706 (2025).
Campbell, D. L. M., Weiner, S. A., Starks, P. T. & Hauber, M. E. Context and control: behavioural ecology experiments in the laboratory. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 46 (112), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.5735/086.046.0204 (2009).
Duncan, E. M. et al. Plastic pollution and small juvenile marine turtles: a potential evolutionary trap. Front. Mar. Sci. 8, 699521. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2021.699521 (2021).
Eastman, C. B. et al. Plastic ingestion in post-hatchling sea turtles: assessing a major threat in Florida near shore waters. Front. Mar. Sci. 7, 693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00693 (2020).
Ryan, P. G. et al. Impacts of plastic ingestion on post-hatchling loggerhead turtles off South Africa. Mar. Pollut Bull. 107, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.005 (2016).
Nafea, T. H. et al. Status of management and mitigation of microplastic pollution. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54, 1734–1756. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2024.2361502 (2024).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a grant "Impact assessment of plastic debris on marine megafauna: focus on sea turtle (PEA0406)" of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology.
Funding
This work was supported by a grant "Impact assessment of plastic debris on marine megafauna: focus on sea turtle (PEA0406)" of the Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.M., H.-J.N., and S.H.H. contributed to conceptualization and methodology. Y.M., G.M.H., and E.V.C. conducted investigation. Y.M. performed formal analysis and visualization, and wrote the original draft. H.-J.N. and S.H.H. contributed to writing (review and editing). S.H.H. and W.J.S. contributed to project administration and supervision, and funding acquisition. E.V.C. provided resources. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Moon, Y., Noh, HJ., Han, G.M. et al. Behavioral responses of captive-bred post-hatchling and juvenile sea turtles to different colors of single-use plastic film. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39765-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39765-0
