Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy investigated by a population based cohort study
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 13 April 2026

Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy investigated by a population based cohort study

  • Jia-Lei Huang1 na1,
  • Zi-Xin Lin2 na1,
  • Ke-Yi Zeng3,4,
  • Zheng Lu1,
  • Xuan-Ping Lin1,
  • He-Rui Wang1,
  • Yong-Wei Xie5 na2 &
  • …
  • Jing-Rong Yang5 na2 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cancer
  • Oncology

Abstract

While surgical intervention administered after neoadjuvant therapy represents the standard treatment in esophageal cancer, the survival benefit conferred by adjuvant therapy administered postoperatively among this patient cohort continues to be controversial. Using real-world data, 6141 esophageal cancer patients administered neoadjuvant treatment preoperatively between 2007 and 2021 were categorized into adjuvant therapy group (n = 1116) or no adjuvant therapy group(n = 5025). No significant differences in overall survival (OS) or cancer-specific survival (CSS) were observed between groups before or after propensity score matching (PSM), and adjuvant therapy was not identified as an independent prognostic factor. However, subgroup analyses revealed important variations: patients treated in 2015–2021 derived greater survival benefit from adjuvant therapy than those in 2007–2014; female patients experienced worse CSS with adjuvant therapy, which was identified as an independent risk factor; among patients receiving preoperative systemic therapy alone, continuing systemic therapy postoperatively showed superior outcomes compared with radiotherapy or combined treatment; and among patients receiving preoperative chemoradiotherapy, no significant differences were observed across different postoperative adjuvant strategies. The findings suggest that while postoperative adjuvant therapy does not provide an overall survival advantage, significant subgroup heterogeneity exists, indicating that clinical decisions should be individualized based on diagnosis year, gender, and preoperative treatment regimen.

Similar content being viewed by others

Surgery alone versus neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with stage T2N0M0 esophageal cancer

Article Open access 21 November 2024

The effect of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on survival outcomes in patients with early stage oral squamous cell carcinoma

Article Open access 25 July 2025

Improved overall survival is associated with adjuvant chemotherapy after definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy for N3 nasopharyngeal cancer

Article Open access 04 August 2022

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) repository.

References

  1. Yang, H., Wang, F., Hallemeier, C. L., Lerut, T. & Fu, J. Oesophageal cancer. Lancet 404, 1991–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02226-8 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Shah, M. A. et al. Treatment of locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: ASCO guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 38, 2677–2694. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.00866 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, Y., Yang, W., Wang, Q. & Zhou, Y. Mechanisms of esophageal cancer metastasis and treatment progress. Front. Immunol. 14, 1206504. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1206504 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eyck, B. M. et al. Ten-year outcome of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer: The randomized controlled CROSS trial. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 1995–2004. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.20.03614 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  5. van Hagen, P. et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 366, 2074–2084. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1112088 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Swisher, S. G. et al. Improved long-term outcome with chemoradiotherapy strategies in esophageal cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 90, 892–898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.04.061 (2010). discussion 898–899.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee, Y. et al. Role of adjuvant therapy in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy and esophagectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 275, 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000005227 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, H. N., Chen, L. Q., Shang, Q. X., Yuan, Y. & Yang, Y. S. A meta-analysis on surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy to treat squamous cell esophageal carcinoma. Int. J. Surg. 80, 184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.06.046 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mokdad, A. A. et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs postoperative observation following preoperative chemoradiotherapy and resection in gastroesophageal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. JAMA Oncol. 4, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.2805 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, H. et al. Postoperative adjuvant therapy for resectable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A retrospective analysis of 426 cases. Med. Oncol. 32, 417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-014-0417-6 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hsu, P. K. et al. Pre- versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 154, 732–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2017.03.038 (2017). .e732.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng, S. Y., Qi, W. X., Zhao, S. G. & Chen, J. Y. No survival benefit could be obtained from adjuvant radiotherapy in esophageal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery: A SEER-based analysis. Front. Oncol. 12, 897476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.897476 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pasquali, S. et al. Survival after neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatments compared to surgery alone for resectable esophageal carcinoma: A network meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. 265, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000001905 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jack, S. et al. The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness and survival in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 40, 1313–1320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.010 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim, G. J. et al. The benefit of chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients with residual disease after trimodality therapy. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. 39, 136–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/coc.0000000000000036 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Darby, S. C. et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 368, 987–998. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shapiro, J. et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): Long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 16, 1090–1098. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(15)00040-6 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kakeji, Y. et al. Multimodality approaches to control esophageal cancer: Development of chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Esophagus 18, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-020-00782-1 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Low, D. E. et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in esophagectomy: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS(®)) society recommendations. World J. Surg. 43, 299–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bai, X. H., Dang, J., Chen, Z. Q., He, Z. & Li, G. Comparison between Intensity-Modulated radiotherapy and Three-Dimensional conformal radiotherapy for their effectiveness in esophageal cancer treatment: A retrospective single institution study. J. Oncol. 2020, 6582341. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6582341 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xu, D., Li, G., Li, H. & Jia, F. Comparison of IMRT versus 3D-CRT in the treatment of esophagus cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Med. (Baltim). 96, e7685. https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000007685 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yap, W. K. et al. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy associated with improved overall survival in resected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in Intensity-Modulated radiotherapy era. Biomedicines https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10112989 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Park, S. Y. et al. The role of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res. Treat. 55, 1231–1239. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2022.1417 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kelly, R. J. et al. Adjuvant nivolumab in resected esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer. N Engl. J. Med. 384, 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2032125 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Unger, J. M. et al. Sex differences in risk of severe adverse events in patients receiving Immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy in cancer clinical trials. J. Clin. Oncol. 40, 1474–1486. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.21.02377 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim, H. I., Lim, H. & Moon, A. Sex differences in cancer: Epidemiology, genetics and therapy. Biomol. Ther. (Seoul). 26, 335–342. https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2018.103 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pala, L. et al. Sex differences in efficacy and toxicity of systemic cancer treatments: Role of the microbiome. J. Clin. Oncol. 37, 439. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.01270 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Glatz, T. et al. Perioperative platin-based chemotherapy for locally advanced esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: Postoperative chemotherapy has a substantial impact on outcome. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 41, 1300–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.07.010 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ajani, J. A. et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Canc Netw. 17, 855–883. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, X. et al. Incidence and onset of severe cardiac events after radiotherapy for esophageal cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 15, 1682–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2020.06.014 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Verma, V., Moreno, A. C. & Lin, S. H. Advances in radiotherapy management of esophageal cancer. J. Clin. Med. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm5100091 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2024J011169; Program Type: General Program).

Author information

Author notes
  1. Jia-Lei Huang and Zi-Xin Lin have contributed equally to this work.

  2. Yong-Wei Xie and Jing-Rong Yang jointlysupervised this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China

    Jia-Lei Huang, Zheng Lu, Xuan-Ping Lin & He-Rui Wang

  2. Academy of Integrative Medicine, Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Fuzhou, 350122, Fujian, China

    Zi-Xin Lin

  3. The First Clinical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China

    Ke-Yi Zeng

  4. Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350005, China

    Ke-Yi Zeng

  5. Fuzong Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University & 900th Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Force, No.156 Northwest Second Ring Road, Fuzhou, 350025, Fujian, China

    Yong-Wei Xie & Jing-Rong Yang

Authors
  1. Jia-Lei Huang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zi-Xin Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ke-Yi Zeng
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zheng Lu
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xuan-Ping Lin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. He-Rui Wang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yong-Wei Xie
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jing-Rong Yang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Jia-Lei Huang and Zi-Xin Lin contributed equally to this work, co-drafting the initial manuscript and participating in data curation and analysis. Ke-Yi Zeng was responsible for the collection and analysis of key experimental data. Lu Zheng, Xuan-Ping Lin, and He-Rui Wang participated in data collection, curation, and the initial preparation of tables and figures. Yong-Wei Xie and Jing-Rong Yang (corresponding authors) conceptualized and designed the study, oversaw the entire research process, and critically reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Wei Xie or Jing-Rong Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download DOCX )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, JL., Lin, ZX., Zeng, KY. et al. Impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in esophageal cancer patients after neoadjuvant therapy investigated by a population based cohort study. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39930-5

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2025

  • Accepted: 09 February 2026

  • Published: 13 April 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-39930-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Esophageal cancer
  • Adjuvant therapy
  • Neoadjuvant therapy
  • Survival
  • SEER
Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing: Cancer

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Cancer newsletter — what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get what matters in cancer research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Cancer