Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
Feasibility and histological analysis of multi-hole versus fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in a porcine model of hilar biliary obstruction
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 18 February 2026

Feasibility and histological analysis of multi-hole versus fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in a porcine model of hilar biliary obstruction

  • Eui Joo Kim1 na1,
  • Huapyong Kang1,2 na1,
  • Jae Keun Park3,
  • Sung Woo Ko4,
  • Suk Pyo Shin5,
  • Joon Mee Kim6,
  • Makoto Kobayashi7,
  • Mamoru Takenaka8,
  • Sung Ill Jang  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-4937-61679,11 &
  • …
  • Seok Jeong  ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-6178-833810 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Diseases
  • Gastroenterology
  • Medical research

Abstract

Conventional fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (FCSEMS) for hilar biliary obstruction (HBO) remains limited due to the potential for side branch obstruction. The multi-hole covered self-expandable metallic stent (MHSEMS) was designed to overcome the limitations of FCSEMS by incorporating side holes into the fully covered membrane. This preclinical study evaluated the feasibility and safety of MHSEMS compared to conventional FCSEMS in a porcine HBO model. HBO was induced via intraductal radiofrequency ablation in eight minipigs. After four weeks, animals were randomized to receive either an MHSEMS or a conventional FCSEMS and were monitored for 12 weeks. Outcomes included technical success, adverse events, stent removability, and histological analysis. Excluding two procedure-related mortalities (one in each group), technical success and 12-week stent removability were achieved in all animals (n = 6). Compared to the FCSEMS group, the MHSEMS group demonstrated trends toward lower total bilirubin levels and reduced histological inflammation score in contralateral ducts (median [range]: 7.5 [7.0–9.0] vs. 9.0 [8.0–10.0], Cliff’s delta = 0.67). In conclusion, the MHSEMS was safely and completely removable within a clinically relevant timeframe. This preclinical pilot study suggests a possible signal toward lower histologic injury with the MHSEMS compared with the FCSEMS, supporting the need for larger, adequately powered clinical studies.

Similar content being viewed by others

Preclinical evaluation of endoscopic placement of a steroid-eluting metal stent in an in vivo porcine benign biliary stricture model

Article Open access 25 May 2022

Feasibility and safety of a novel 3D-printed biodegradable biliary stent in an in vivo porcine model: a preliminary study

Article Open access 23 September 2022

Real-time segmentation of biliary structure in pure laparoscopic donor hepatectomy

Article Open access 28 September 2024

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Salgado, S. M., Gaidhane, M. & Kahaleh, M. Endoscopic palliation of malignant biliary strictures. World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 8, 240–247. https://doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v8.i3.240 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dorrell, R., Pawa, S. & Pawa, R. Endoscopic management of malignant biliary stricture. Diagnostics (Basel) 10 https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10060390 (2020).

  3. Molina, H., Chan, M. M., Lewandowski, R. J., Gabr, A. & Riaz, A. Complications of percutaneous biliary procedures. Semin Intervent Radiol. 38, 364–372. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731375 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elmunzer, B. J. et al. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of biliary strictures. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 118, 405–426. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000002190 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Angsuwatcharakon, P. et al. The updated Asia-Pacific consensus statement on the role of endoscopic management in malignant hilar biliary obstruction. Endosc Int. Open. 12, E1065–E1074. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2366-7302 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Xia, M. X. et al. The risk of acute cholangitis after endoscopic stenting for malignant hilar strictures: A large comprehensive study. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 35, 1150–1157. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.14954 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cho, J. H. et al. Long-term results of temperature-controlled endobiliary radiofrequency ablation in a normal swine model. Gastrointest. Endosc. 87, 1147–1150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.09.013 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, J. et al. Endoscopic stenting of a fully covered Self-Expandable metal stent with a hole in each cavity in malignant hilar biliary obstruction: A preclinical Proof-of-Concept study and initial human experience. Dig. Dis. Sci. 70, 1215–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-024-08810-1 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  9. McMaster, P. D. & Rous, P. The biliary obstruction required to produce jaundice. J. Exp. Med. 33, 731–750. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.33.6.731 (1921).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berntsen, D. Direct retrieval as a theory of involuntary autobiographical memories: evaluation and future directions. Memory 32, 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2023.2294690 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kitagawa, K., Tomooka, F. & Yoshiji, H. Efficacy of a novel covered metallic stent with side holes for malignant anastomotic stenosis of choledochojejunostomy. Dig. Endosc. 36, 628–630. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14779 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takeda, T. et al. Outcomes of multi-hole self-expandable metal stents versus fully covered self-expandable metal stents for malignant distal biliary obstruction in unresectable pancreatic cancer. DEN Open. 5, e70014. https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.70014 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanoue, K. et al. Antegrade stenting using a new covered multi-hole metal stent for malignant biliary obstruction in surgically altered anatomy. Endoscopy 56, E98–E99. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2233-2843 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Maruyama, H. et al. Stent-in-stent deployment above the papilla to treat malignant hepatic hilar biliary obstruction using novel fully covered multi-hole metal stent. Endoscopy 55, E1062–E1064. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2158-7776 (2023).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ogura, T., Uba, Y., Kanadani, T., Bessho, K. & Nishikawa, H. Multi-hole metal stent can prevent cystic and pancreatic duct obstruction during endoscopic ultrasound-guided antegrade stenting combined with hepaticogastrostomy. Endoscopy 57, E163–E164. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2528-0340 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vaishnavi, C., Samanta, J. & Kochhar, R. Characterization of biofilms in biliary stents and potential factors involved in occlusion. World J. Gastroenterol. 24, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i1.112 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, T. H. Technical tips and issues of biliary stenting, focusing on malignant hilar obstruction. Clin. Endosc. 46, 260–266. https://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2013.46.3.260 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huibregtse, K., Cheng, J., Coene, P. P., Fockens, P. & Tytgat, G. N. Endoscopic placement of expandable metal stents for biliary strictures–a preliminary report on experience with 33 patients. Endoscopy 21, 280–282. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1012969 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Irving, J. D. et al. Gianturco expandable metallic biliary stents: results of a European clinical trial. Radiology 172, 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.172.2.2664861 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Chun, H. J. et al. Gastrointestinal and biliary stents. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 25, 234–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06152.x (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davids, P. H., Groen, A. K., Rauws, E. A., Tytgat, G. N. & Huibregtse, K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet 340, 1488–1492. https://doi.org/10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaassis, M. et al. Plastic or metal stents for malignant stricture of the common bile duct? Results of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 57, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1067/mge.2003.66 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kerdsirichairat, T. et al. Endoscopic drainage of > 50% of liver in malignant hilar biliary obstruction using metallic or fenestrated plastic stents. Clin. Transl Gastroenterol. 8, e115. https://doi.org/10.1038/ctg.2017.42 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sangchan, A., Kongkasame, W., Pugkhem, A., Jenwitheesuk, K. & Mairiang, P. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 76, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.048 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mukai, T. et al. Metallic stents are more efficacious than plastic stents in unresectable malignant hilar biliary strictures: a randomized controlled trial. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Sci. 20, 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-012-0508-8 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, T. H., Moon, J. H. & Park, S. H. Biliary stenting for hilar malignant biliary obstruction. Dig. Endosc. 32, 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/den.13549 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lam, R. & Muniraj, T. Fully covered metal biliary stents: A review of the literature. World J. Gastroenterol. 27, 6357–6373. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v27.i38.6357 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Saito, K. et al. A prospective multicenter study of partially covered metal stents in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: BTS-NAC study. Gut Liver. 15, 135–141. https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl19302 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Niiya, F. et al. Efficacy and safety of uncovered self-expandable metal stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction in unresectable non-pancreatic cancer. DEN Open. 5, e383. https://doi.org/10.1002/deo2.383 (2025).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wong, M., Sanchez-Luna, S. A. & Rustagi, T. Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder stenting to prevent acute cholecystitis in patients receiving FCEMS for benign biliary stricture. Endosc Int. Open. 9, E1386–E1390. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1500-8028 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jang, S. et al. Association of covered metallic stents with cholecystitis and stent migration in malignant biliary stricture. Gastrointest. Endosc. 87, 1061–1070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2017.08.024 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Inoue, T. et al. Feasibility of the placement of a novel 6-mm diameter threaded fully covered self-expandable metal stent for malignant hilar biliary obstructions (with videos). Gastrointest. Endosc. 84, 352–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.03.1501 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kulpatcharapong, S. et al. Efficacy of multi-hole self-expandable metal stent compared to fully covered and uncovered self-expandable metal stents in patients with unresectable malignant distal biliary obstruction: a propensity analysis. Surg. Endosc. 38, 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10541-9 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Park, J. S., Jeong, S., Kobayashi, M. & Lee, D. H. Safety, efficacy, and removability of a fully covered multi-hole metal stent in a swine model of hilar biliary stricture: a feasibility study. Endosc Int. Open. 7, E498–E503. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0846-0775 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was funded by the 2024 domestic medical device new product association linked user (Medical Institution) multi-institution evaluation support project.

Author information

Author notes
  1. These authors contributed equally: Eui Joo Kim and Huapyong Kang.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

    Eui Joo Kim & Huapyong Kang

  2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Huapyong Kang

  3. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Seoul, Korea

    Jae Keun Park

  4. Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea

    Sung Woo Ko

  5. Digestive Disease Center, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, Korea

    Suk Pyo Shin

  6. Department of Pathology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea

    Joon Mee Kim

  7. Department of Gastroenterology, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Yokkaichi, Japan

    Makoto Kobayashi

  8. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan

    Mamoru Takenaka

  9. Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

    Sung Ill Jang

  10. Department of Internal Medicine, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27 Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon, 22332, Korea

    Seok Jeong

  11. Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06273, Korea

    Sung Ill Jang

Authors
  1. Eui Joo Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huapyong Kang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jae Keun Park
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sung Woo Ko
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Suk Pyo Shin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Joon Mee Kim
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Makoto Kobayashi
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Mamoru Takenaka
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Sung Ill Jang
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Seok Jeong
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization, S.I.J., S.J., M.K., M.T.; Study design: S.I.J., S.J.; Methodology: S.I.J., S.J.; Data collections: E.J.K., H.K., J.K.P., S.W.K., S.P.S.; Data analysis: E.J.K., J.M.K.; Writing—original draft: E.J.K.; Writing—review and editing: H.K., J.M.K.; Supervision: S.I.J., S.J.; Project administration: S.J. E.J.K and H.K. equally contributed to this article as first authors. S.I.J. and S.J. equally contributed to this article as corresponding authors. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sung Ill Jang or Seok Jeong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, E.J., Kang, H., Park, J.K. et al. Feasibility and histological analysis of multi-hole versus fully covered self-expandable metallic stents in a porcine model of hilar biliary obstruction. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40067-8

Download citation

  • Received: 06 December 2025

  • Accepted: 10 February 2026

  • Published: 18 February 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-40067-8

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com sitemap

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing