Table 3 Performance comparison of HSICNet with traditional classifiers (SVM and Random Forest) on Indian Pines, Pavia University, and Salinas datasets.
Model | Dataset | OA (%) | AA (%) | κ | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVM | Indian Pines | 84.52 | 82.13 | 0.81 | 0.835 |
RF | Indian Pines | 87.91 | 84.70 | 0.85 | 0.865 |
HSICNet | Indian Pines | 98.63 | 97.42 | 0.98 | 0.976 |
SVM | Pavia University | 90.12 | 88.60 | 0.88 | 0.892 |
RF | Pavia University | 92.33 | 90.11 | 0.91 | 0.905 |
HSICNet | Pavia University | 99.14 | 98.30 | 0.99 | 0.986 |
SVM | Salinas | 88.75 | 87.49 | 0.86 | 0.872 |
RF | Salinas | 91.04 | 89.77 | 0.89 | 0.893 |
HSICNet | Salinas | 99.35 | 98.91 | 0.99 | 0.991 |