Table 2 Multilevel logistic regression analysis of individual-, household- and community-level factors related to child morbidity.

From: Prevalence and risk factors of child morbidity with spatial analysis among under five children in Bangladesh

Variable

Model 0

Model I

aOR (95% CI)

Model II

aOR (95% CI)

Model III

aOR (95% CI)

Model IV

aOR (95% CI)

Individual-level

 Children’s age in months

  0–11

 

1

  

1

  12–23

 

1.38 (1.12–1.71) b

  

1.38 (1.12–1.70) b

  24–59

 

0.72 (0.58–0.89) b

  

0.71 (0.57–0.88) b

 Sex of children

  Male

 

1

  

1

  Female

 

0.91 (0.79–1.04)

  

0.90 (0.78–1.04)

 Wasting

  No

 

1

  

1

  Yes

 

1.07 (0.86–1.33)

  

1.06 (0.86–1.32)

 Currently breastfeeding

  No

 

1

   

  Yes

 

0.82 (0.68–0.99) c

  

0.82 (0.68–0.99) c

Household-level

 Mother’s education

  No education

  

1

 

1

  Primary

  

1.24 (0.90–1.72)

 

1.21 (0.87–1.69)

  Secondary

  

1.44 (1.05–1.96) c

 

1.42 (1.03–1.95) c

  Higher

  

1.02 (0.72–1.46)

 

0.98 (0.68–1.41)

 Mother’s currently working status

  No

  

1

 

1

  Yes

  

1.04 (0.89–1.23)

 

1.07 (0.90–1.27)

 Sex of household head

  Male

  

1

 

1

  Female

  

1.02 (0.82–1.26)

 

1.04 (0.84–1.29)

 Wealth index

  Poorest

  

1

 

1

  Poorer

  

1.08 (0.87–1.34)

 

1.04 (0.83–1.30)

  Middle

  

0.93 (0.74–1.16)

 

0.90 (0.71–1.13)

  Richer

  

0.97 (0.77–1.22)

 

0.91 (0.71–1.16)

  Richest

  

0.80 (0.62–1.04)

 

0.74 (0.56–0.97) c

Community-level

 Place of residence

  Urban

   

1

1

  Rural

  

0.88 (0.73–1.06)

0.78 (0.65–0.95) c

 Division

  Barisal

   

1

1

  Chittagong

   

0.98 (0.72–1.33)

0.94 (0.69–1.28)

  Dhaka

   

0.79 (0.57–1.08)

0.78 (0.56–1.09)

  Khulna

   

1.14 (0.82–1.60)

1.11 (0.79–1.56)

  Mymensingh

   

0.93 (0.67–1.30)

0.90 (0.64–1.25)

  Rajshahi

   

1.26 (0.89–1.78)

1.22 (0.86–1.73)

  Rangpur

   

1.01 (0.72–1.41)

0.95 (0.68–1.33)

  Sylhet

   

0.99 (0.71–1.37)

1.02 (0.73–1.43)

 Community-level media

  Low

   

1

1

  High

   

0.91 (0.76–1.09)

0.95 (0.79–1.15)

Model diagnosis

 Variance (CI)

0.29 (0.18–0.45)

0.29 (0.18–0.45)

0.29 (0.18–0.45)

0.27 (0.17–0.43)

0.27 (0.17–0.44)

 ICC (%)

8.031

8.011

8.013

7.663

7.633

 PCV (%)

Ref

0.249

0.224

4.582

4.956

Model fitness

 Log-likelihood

-2550.82

-2530.28

-2537.71

-2545.37

-2509.67

 AIC

5105.63

5074.56

5097.41

5112.74

5069.34

 BIC

5118.22

5118.62

5166.66

5181.99

5226.72

 N

4,005

4,005

4,005

4,005

4,005

Interaction effect

     

 Wealth*place of residence

     

 Poorer*rural

    

0.71 (0.38–1.31)

 Middle*rural

    

1.19 (0.66–2.16)

 Richer*rural

    

1.04 (0.57–1.87)

 Richest*rural

    

0.65 (0.35–1.20)

 Maternal education*currently breastfeeding

     

 Primary*yes

    

1.15 (0.60–2.24)

 Secondary*yes

    

0.84 (0.45–1.56)

 Higher *yes

    

0.83 (0.42–1.64)

  1. Model 0 included no explanatory variables; Model I adjusted individual-level factors; Model II included household-level factors; Model III adjusted community-level factors; Model IV adjusted individual-, household- and community-level factors. Here a, b, and c indicate P < 0.001, P ≤ 0.01, P ≤ 0.05.