Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Advertisement

Scientific Reports
  • View all journals
  • Search
  • My Account Login
  • Content Explore content
  • About the journal
  • Publish with us
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed
  1. nature
  2. scientific reports
  3. articles
  4. article
The 129S1/SvlmJ mouse strain recapitulates severe hypertensive target organ damage under moderate angiotensin II–induced hypertension
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open access
  • Published: 05 March 2026

The 129S1/SvlmJ mouse strain recapitulates severe hypertensive target organ damage under moderate angiotensin II–induced hypertension

  • Arthur Orieux1,2,
  • Romain Boulestreau1,3,
  • Marie-Lise Bats1,4,
  • Maxime Michot1,
  • Alexandre Boyer2,
  • Virginie Dinet1,
  • Juliette Vaurs1,
  • Pascale Dufourcq1,
  • Claire Peghaire1,
  • Cécile Duplaa1,
  • Thierry Couffinhal1,3 &
  • …
  • Sébastien Rubin1,5 

Scientific Reports , Article number:  (2026) Cite this article

  • 811 Accesses

  • Metrics details

We are providing an unedited version of this manuscript to give early access to its findings. Before final publication, the manuscript will undergo further editing. Please note there may be errors present which affect the content, and all legal disclaimers apply.

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Diseases
  • Genetics
  • Neuroscience

Abstract

Hypertension remains the leading cause of cerebral, cardiac, renal, and retinal vascular damage. However, genetic determinants underlying organ-specific vulnerability are poorly understood, and commonly used mouse models, notably C57BL/6J, often fail to recapitulate severe hypertensive complications seen in humans. This study compares the widely used C57BL/6J mouse strain with the genetically distinct 129S1/SvlmJ strain under hypertensive stress, aiming to identify a model that better reproduces hypertensive target organ damage. Moderate hypertension was induced in 129S1/SvlmJ and C57BL/6J mice using chronic infusion of angiotensin II (600 ng/kg/min). Despite comparable blood pressure elevations, only 129S1/SvlmJ mice developed severe organ damage, including cognitive impairment, pronounced blood-brain barrier disruption, retinal vasculopathy, cardiac hypertrophy, and podocyte lesions with albuminuria. In contrast, C57BL/6J mice exhibited markedly less organ injury under the experimental conditions tested. Transcriptomic analysis of cerebral microvessels identified distinct inflammatory and immune-related signatures between strains, paralleling their vascular phenotypes. These immune profiles appear as hallmarks of strain-specific susceptibility rather than as direct protective or deleterious mechanisms. This study demonstrates that genetic background critically shapes hypertensive complications, identifying the 129S1/SvlmJ strain as a relevant and translational model of hypertensive target organ damage. Beyond reproducing key features of severe hypertension, this model provides a framework to investigate the pathways linking genetic susceptibility, vascular injury, and end-organ damage.

Similar content being viewed by others

A novel rat model of cerebral small vessel disease based on vascular risk factors of hypertension, aging, and cerebral hypoperfusion

Article 13 June 2024

Decoding the mechanism of hypertension through multiomics profiling

Article Open access 03 November 2022

Identification of potential biomarkers for hypertension based on transcriptomic analysis in rats

Article 16 April 2025

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the ArrayExpress repository number E-MTAB-15937 : https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/arrayexpress/studies/E-MTAB-15937.

References

  1. Mills, K. T., Stefanescu, A. & He, J. The global epidemiology of hypertension. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 16, 223–237 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhou, B., Perel, P., Mensah, G. A. & Ezzati, M. Global epidemiology, health burden and effective interventions for elevated blood pressure and hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 18, 785–802 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foreman, K. J. et al. Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016–40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet 392, 2052–2090 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carey, R. M., Moran, A. E. & Whelton, P. K. Treatment of Hypertension: A Review. JAMA 328, 1849 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander, M. R., Edwards, T. L. & Harrison, D. G. GWAS for Defining the Etiology of Hypertension: Have They Delivered? Hypertension HYPERTENSIONAHA.124.23451. (2025).

  6. The International Consortium for Blood Pressure Genome-Wide Association Studies. Genetic variants in novel pathways influence blood pressure and cardiovascular disease risk. Nature 478, 103–109 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lerman, L. O. et al. Animal Models of Hypertension: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Hypertension 73. (2019).

  8. Vorhees, C. V. & Williams, M. T. Morris water maze: procedures for assessing spatial and related forms of learning and memory. Nat. Protoc. 1, 848–858 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fox, M. W. The visual cliff test for the study of visual depth perception in the mouse. Anim. Behav. 13, 232–IN3 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Devraj, K., Guérit, S., Macas, J. & Reiss, Y. An In Vivo Blood-brain Barrier Permeability Assay in Mice Using Fluorescently Labeled Tracers. JoVE 57038. (2018).

  11. Susaki, E. A. et al. Advanced CUBIC protocols for whole-brain and whole-body clearing and imaging. Nat. Protoc. 10, 1709–1727 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S. & Eliceiri, K. W. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 9, 671–675 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Abelanet, A. et al. Increased Capillary Permeability in Heart Induces Diastolic Dysfunction Independently of Inflammation, Fibrosis, or Cardiomyocyte Dysfunction. ATVB 42, 745–763 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schiller, N. B. et al. Recommendations for Quantitation of the Left Ventricle by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2, 358–367 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stypmann, J. et al. Echocardiographic assessment of global left ventricular function in mice. Lab. Anim. 43, 127–137 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bats, M. et al. Therapies targeting Frizzled‐7/β‐catenin pathway prevent the development of pathological angiogenesis in an ischemic retinopathy model. FASEB J. 34, 1288–1303 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Emde B, Heinen A, Gödecke A, Bottermann K. Wheat germ agglutinin staining as a suitable method for detection and quantification of fibrosis in cardiac tissue after myocardial infarction. Eur J. Histochem (2014).

  18. Gueniot, F. et al. Targeting Pdzrn3 maintains adult blood-brain barrier and central nervous system homeostasis. J. Cereb. Blood Flow. Metab. 42, 613–629 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, Y-K., Uchida, H., Smith, H., Ito, A. & Sanchez, T. The isolation and molecular characterization of cerebral microvessels. Nat. Protoc. 14, 3059–3081 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wolf, G. et al. Differentially Severe Cognitive Effects of Compromised Cerebral Blood Flow in Aged Mice: Association with Myelin Degradation and Microglia Activation. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9, 191 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Di Pardo, A. et al. Impairment of blood-brain barrier is an early event in R6/2 mouse model of Huntington Disease. Sci. Rep. 7, 41316 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kelly, D. M. & Rothwell, P. M. Blood pressure and the brain: the neurology of hypertension. Pract. Neurol. 20, 100–108 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Escartin, C. et al. Reactive astrocyte nomenclature, definitions, and future directions. Nat. Neurosci. 24, 312–325 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wang, G. et al. Podocyte Loss in Human Hypertensive Nephrosclerosis. Am. J. Hypertens. 22, 300–306 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xue, B., Pamidimukkala, J. & Hay, M. Sex differences in the development of angiotensin II-induced hypertension in conscious mice. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 288, H2177–H2184 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Benigni, A., Cassis, P. & Remuzzi, G. Angiotensin II revisited: new roles in inflammation, immunology and aging. EMBO Mol. Med. 2, 247–257 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Guzik, T. J., Nosalski, R., Maffia, P. & Drummond, G. R. Immune and inflammatory mechanisms in hypertension. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 21, 396–416 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  29. González Ibanez, F. et al. Immunofluorescence Staining Using IBA1 and TMEM119 for Microglial Density, Morphology and Peripheral Myeloid Cell Infiltration Analysis in Mouse Brain. JoVE 60510. (2019).

  30. Wen, W., Cheng, J. & Tang, Y. Brain perivascular macrophages: current understanding and future prospects. Brain 147, 39–55 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Faraco, G. et al. Perivascular macrophages mediate the neurovascular and cognitive dysfunction associated with hypertension. J. Clin. Invest. 126, 4674–4689 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pantoni, L. Cerebral small vessel disease: from pathogenesis and clinical characteristics to therapeutic challenges. Lancet Neurol. 9, 689–701 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hainsworth, A. H., Markus, H. S. & Schneider, J. A. Cerebral Small Vessel Disease, Hypertension, and Vascular Contributions to Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Hypertension 81, 75–86 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Gallo, G., Volpe, M. & Savoia, C. Endothelial Dysfunction in Hypertension: Current Concepts and Clinical Implications. Front. Med. 8, 798958 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Quick, S., Moss, J., Rajani, R. M. & Williams, A. A Vessel for Change: Endothelial Dysfunction in Cerebral Small Vessel Disease. Trends Neurosci. 44, 289–305 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Mora, P. et al. Blood–brain barrier genetic disruption leads to protective barrier formation at the Glia Limitans. Daneman R, ed. PLoS Biol ;18:e3000946. (2020).

  37. Haruwaka, K. et al. Dual microglia effects on blood brain barrier permeability induced by systemic inflammation. Nat. Commun. 10, 5816 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Harrison, D. G. & Patrick, D. M. Immune Mechanisms in Hypertension. Hypertension 81, 1659–1674 (2024).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank Béatrice JASPARD-VINASSA and Muriel BUSSON for scientific advice, Philippe ALZIEU, Sylvain GROLLEAU, Maxime DAVID for their technical assistance and animal care; Christelle BOULLE and Hélène AOUIZERATE for administrative assistance. We thank Prof. Céline GUILBEAU-FRUGIER (UMR 1297, Toulouse, France) for Electron Microscopy images. This work benefited from equipment and services from the PCRq’UB platform (Bordeaux University). We thank Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FRM) for it support)

Funding

Arthur ORIEUX (salary grant) : MD-PhD student grant – CHU de Bordeaux et Université de Bordeaux. Bourse Société Francophone de Néphrologie Dialyse et Transplantation (SFNDT) 2023. This project is supported by a grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the Investment for the Future Programme ANR-18-RHUS-0002 (SHIVA Project) and by the Precision and Global Vascular Brain Health Institute (VBHI) funded by the France 2030 IHU3 initiative.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BMC, Pessac, U1034, F-33600, France

    Arthur Orieux, Romain Boulestreau, Marie-Lise Bats, Maxime Michot, Virginie Dinet, Juliette Vaurs, Pascale Dufourcq, Claire Peghaire, Cécile Duplaa, Thierry Couffinhal & Sébastien Rubin

  2. Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

    Arthur Orieux & Alexandre Boyer

  3. Service des Maladies Coronaires et Vasculaires, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, 1, Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, F-33604, France

    Romain Boulestreau & Thierry Couffinhal

  4. Service de Biochimie, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

    Marie-Lise Bats

  5. Service de Néphrologie, Transplantation, Dialyse et Aphérèses, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

    Sébastien Rubin

Authors
  1. Arthur Orieux
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Romain Boulestreau
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Marie-Lise Bats
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Maxime Michot
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Alexandre Boyer
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Virginie Dinet
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Juliette Vaurs
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Pascale Dufourcq
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Claire Peghaire
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Cécile Duplaa
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Thierry Couffinhal
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Sébastien Rubin
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Data acquisition : Maxime Michot, Juliette Vaurs, Marie-Lise Bats, Virginie Dinet, Romain BoulestreauData acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data : Arthur Orieux Marie-Lise Bats and Sébastien RubinConception or design of the work : Sébastien Rubin, Cécile Duplaa, Thierry CouffinhalDrafting the work : Arthur Orieux and Sébastien RubinReviewing the manuscript Sébastien Rubin, Cécile Duplaa, Thierry Couffinhal, Alexandre Boyer, Claire Peghaire and Pascale DufourcqImportant intellectual content : Sébastien Rubin, Cécile Duplaa, Thierry Couffinhal, Claire Peghaire.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sébastien Rubin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1 (download PDF )

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Orieux, A., Boulestreau, R., Bats, ML. et al. The 129S1/SvlmJ mouse strain recapitulates severe hypertensive target organ damage under moderate angiotensin II–induced hypertension. Sci Rep (2026). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41288-7

Download citation

  • Received: 14 October 2025

  • Accepted: 19 February 2026

  • Published: 05 March 2026

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-41288-7

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Download PDF

Advertisement

Explore content

  • Research articles
  • News & Comment
  • Collections
  • Subjects
  • Follow us on Facebook
  • Follow us on X
  • Sign up for alerts
  • RSS feed

About the journal

  • About Scientific Reports
  • Contact
  • Journal policies
  • Guide to referees
  • Calls for Papers
  • Editor's Choice
  • Journal highlights
  • Open Access Fees and Funding

Publish with us

  • For authors
  • Language editing services
  • Open access funding
  • Submit manuscript

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

  • Explore articles by subject
  • Find a job
  • Guide to authors
  • Editorial policies

Scientific Reports (Sci Rep)

ISSN 2045-2322 (online)

nature.com footer links

About Nature Portfolio

  • About us
  • Press releases
  • Press office
  • Contact us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Articles by subject
  • protocols.io
  • Nature Index

Publishing policies

  • Nature portfolio policies
  • Open access

Author & Researcher services

  • Reprints & permissions
  • Research data
  • Language editing
  • Scientific editing
  • Nature Masterclasses
  • Research Solutions

Libraries & institutions

  • Librarian service & tools
  • Librarian portal
  • Open research
  • Recommend to library

Advertising & partnerships

  • Advertising
  • Partnerships & Services
  • Media kits
  • Branded content

Professional development

  • Nature Awards
  • Nature Careers
  • Nature Conferences

Regional websites

  • Nature Africa
  • Nature China
  • Nature India
  • Nature Japan
  • Nature Middle East
  • Privacy Policy
  • Use of cookies
  • Legal notice
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Your US state privacy rights
Springer Nature

© 2026 Springer Nature Limited

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing